[bts-link] source package gcc-9

2020-05-21 Thread debian-bts-link
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-9
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#

user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

# remote status report for #944640 (http://bugs.debian.org/944640)
# Bug title: gtk-d: FTBFS on armel/armhf with many "multiple definition" 
messages
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR92216
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
usertags 944640 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #944640 (http://bugs.debian.org/944640)
# Bug title: gtk-d: FTBFS on armel/armhf with many "multiple definition" 
messages
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR92216
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
usertags 944640 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

# remote status report for #944640 (http://bugs.debian.org/944640)
# Bug title: gtk-d: FTBFS on armel/armhf with many "multiple definition" 
messages
#  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR92216
#  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
#  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
usertags 944640 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED

thanks



Results for 8.4.0 (Debian 8.4.0-4) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf

2020-05-21 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-8.4.0 revision 
8cd3bffead2ed1d1998c190865694f920fbc93ab

Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf

=== libatomic tests ===


Running target unix

=== libatomic Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes44
# of unsupported tests  5

Running target unix/-fstack-protector

=== libatomic Summary for unix/-fstack-protector ===

# of expected passes44
# of unsupported tests  5

=== libatomic Summary ===

# of expected passes88
# of unsupported tests  10
=== libffi tests ===


Running target unix

=== libffi Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes2214

Running target unix/-fstack-protector

=== libffi Summary for unix/-fstack-protector ===

# of expected passes2214

=== libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes4428
=== libgo tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: io
FAIL: log
FAIL: runtime
FAIL: runtime/pprof
FAIL: sync/atomic

=== libgo Summary ===

# of expected passes158
# of unexpected failures5
/build/gcc-8-wRN2zl/gcc-8-8.4.0/build/./gcc/gccgo version 8.4.0 (Debian 8.4.0-4)

=== libgomp tests ===


Running target unix

=== libgomp Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes5465
# of expected failures  2
# of unsupported tests  364

Running target unix/-fstack-protector

=== libgomp Summary for unix/-fstack-protector ===

# of expected passes5465
# of expected failures  2
# of unsupported tests  364

=== libgomp Summary ===

# of expected passes10930
# of expected failures  4
# of unsupported tests  728
=== libphobos tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/static/std.math
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/static/std.net.curl
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/static/std.random
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/static/std.zip
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/shared/std.math
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/shared/std.net.curl
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/shared/std.random
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/shared/std.zip

=== libphobos Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes394
# of unexpected failures8

Running target unix/-fstack-protector
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/static/std.math
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/static/std.net.curl
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/static/std.random
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/static/std.zip
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/shared/std.math
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/shared/std.net.curl
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/shared/std.random
FAIL: libphobos.unittests/phobos/shared/std.zip

=== libphobos Summary for unix/-fstack-protector ===

# of expected passes394
# of unexpected failures8

=== libphobos Summary ===

# of expected passes788
# of unexpected failures16
=== libstdc++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/char/3.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_date/wchar_t/4.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/wrapped_env.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/wrapped_locale.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/wrapped_env.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/wrapped_locale.cc execution test

=== libstdc++ Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes12165
# of unexpected failures8
# of expected failures  71
# of unsupported tests  284

Running target unix/-fstack-protector
FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/char/3.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_date/wchar_t/4.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/wrapped_env.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/wrapped_locale.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/2.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/wrapped_env.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/wrapped_locale.cc execution test

=== libstdc++ Summary for unix/-fstack-protector ===

# of expected passes12165
# of unexpected failures8
# of expected failures  71
# of unsupported tests  284

=== libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes24330
# of unexpected failures16
# of expect

Bug#961159: lib32{,x}gcc-s1: please provide lib{,x}32gcc1 (= 1:${binary:Version})

2020-05-21 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 21/05/2020 14.05, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 5/20/20 10:32 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> With the transitional packages gone in 10.1.0-2, please add versioned
>> (epoched!) provides on the old names (as already done in libgcc-s1)
>> in order to keep old packages installable along the latest gcc.
> 
> I'd like to avoid that.  Please build the nvidia packages using the new 
> package
> names.

This has nothing to do with nvidia. This breaks keeping old compilers
around, which so far worked fine for a long time.

Andreas



Bug#961159: lib32{,x}gcc-s1: please provide lib{,x}32gcc1 (= 1:${binary:Version})

2020-05-21 Thread Matthias Klose
On 5/20/20 10:32 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: lib32gcc-s1,libx32gcc-s1
> Version: 10.1.0-2
> Severity: important
> 
> With the transitional packages gone in 10.1.0-2, please add versioned
> (epoched!) provides on the old names (as already done in libgcc-s1)
> in order to keep old packages installable along the latest gcc.

I'd like to avoid that.  Please build the nvidia packages using the new package
names.