Processed: retitle 290438
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package g77-3.3 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: g77-3.3 retitle 290438 g77-3.3: produces wrong code on i386 compiling with -fno-automatic -O1 Bug#290438: produces wrong code on i386 compiling with -fno-automatic -O1 Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291060: marked as done (libstdc++6-4.0-doc: cannot install)
Your message dated Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:54:22 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#291060: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: cannot install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2005 14:09:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 18 06:09:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cqu3Q-0007Yn-00; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:09:56 -0800 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713383067C2; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:09:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893372C8144; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:09:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27812-04; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:09:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id B993E2C819D; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:09:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:09:11 +0100 From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: cannot install X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:09:11 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libstdc++6-4.0-doc Version: 4.0-0pre4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install libstdc++6-4.0-doc [...] Unpacking libstdc++6-4.0-doc (from .../libstdc++6-4.0-doc_4.0-0pre4_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libstdc++6-4.0-doc_4.0-0pre4_all.deb (--unpack): unable to clean up mess surrounding `./usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0-base/libstdc++/html_user/structstd_1_1tr1_1_1tuple__size_3_01tuple_3_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_class_00_01___null_' before installing another version: File name too long dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 291060-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2005 15:54:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 30 07:54:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CvHPD-0001mb-00; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 07:54:31 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA13689; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:54:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0C3F21A; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:54:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 29229-31; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:54:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:54:23 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j0UFsM7L015259; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:54:22 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:54:22 +0100 To: Laurent Bonnaud
Processed: Re: Bug#293076: g++-3.3 uninformative error when base class missing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 293076 + fixed-upstream Bug#293076: g++-3.3 uninformative error when base class missing There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream tags 293076 + upstream Bug#293076: g++-3.3 uninformative error when base class missing Tags were: fixed-upstream Tags added: upstream retitle 293076 [fixed in 3.4] g++-3.3 uninformative error when base class missing Bug#293076: g++-3.3 uninformative error when base class missing Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: [ARM] gcc optimisation bug (-O2 fails; -O0 and -O1 work)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 91823 gcc-2.95 Bug#91823: binutils will not build on arm Bug reassigned from package `binutils' to `gcc-2.95'. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#91846: marked as done (g++: /usr/doc/g++-2.95/README.C++ mentions docs but not package)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:38:51 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#91846: g++: /usr/doc/g++-2.95/README.C++ mentions docs but not package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2001 01:26:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 26 19:26:36 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h0040333b7dc3.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.112.255] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14hiFo-0003C3-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:26:36 -0600 Received: by h0040333b7dc3.ne.mediaone.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9AB7410C95530; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:26:14 -0500 (EST) From: Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: g++: /usr/doc/g++-2.95/README.C++ mentions docs but not package To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:26:14 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: g++ Version: 1:2.95.3-5 Severity: normal /usr/doc/g++-2.95/README.C++ says STL docs are in /usr/doc/stl-manual; it should also mention that it requires the stl-manual package. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux zewt.org 2.4.2-XFS #4 SMP Thu Feb 22 19:10:26 EST 2001 i686 unknown Versions of the packages g++ depends on: ii cpp2.95.3-5 The GNU C preprocessor. ii g++-2.95 2.95.3-8 The GNU C++ compiler. ii gcc-2.95 2.95.3-8 The GNU C compiler. --- Received: (at 91846-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2001 05:43:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 26 23:43:46 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14hmGg-5z-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 23:43:46 -0600 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA03421; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:38:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id HAA22476; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:38:51 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:38:51 +0200 (MEST) To: Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#91846: g++: /usr/doc/g++-2.95/README.C++ mentions docs but not package In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Glenn Maynard writes: Package: g++ Version: 1:2.95.3-5 Severity: normal /usr/doc/g++-2.95/README.C++ says STL docs are in /usr/doc/stl-manual; it should also mention that it requires the stl-manual package. It reads: On Debian GNU/Linux you find documentation in the stl-manual package. After installing this package, point your browser to file://localhost/usr/doc/stl-manual/html/index.html
Processed: changing severity of gcc bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 90143 wishlist Bug#90143: source parallelisation suggestion Severity set to `wishlist'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#90370: marked as done (I can not install the package because of 'error code (1)')
Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:24:37 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95-2.95.3-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2001 02:22:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 20:22:08 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ha1.servicios.retecal.es [212.22.34.7] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14fBmh-0001Tv-00; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:22:08 -0600 Received: from TodoSCSI (cable236a173.usuarios.retecal.es [212.183.236.173]) by ha1.servicios.retecal.es (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA16774 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:20:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from sergio by TodoSCSI with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14fBlN-0005lK-00; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:20:45 +0100 From: Sergio González González [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: I can not install the package because of 'error code (1)' X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:20:45 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sergio_Gonz=E1lez_Gonz=E1lez?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gpc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.3-8 Severity: normal Hello, Today, after 'dist-upgrade', I get the next error: TodoSCSI:/home/sergio# apt-get install gpc Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: gpc-2.95 The following NEW packages will be installed: gpc gpc-2.95 0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/1293kB of archives. After unpacking 3356kB will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] (Leyendo la base de datos ... 131462 ficheros y directorios instalados actualmente.) Desempaquetando gpc-2.95 (de .../devel/gpc-2.95_2.95.3-8.deb) ... rm: `/usr/share/doc/gpc-2.95' is a directory dpkg: error al procesar /mnt/cache/mirror/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/devel/gpc-2.95_2.95.3-8.deb (--unpack): el subproceso pre-installation script devolvió el código de salida de error 1 Seleccionando el paquete gpc previamente no seleccionado. Desempaquetando gpc (de .../devel/gpc_2.95.3-5.deb) ... Se encontraron errores al procesar: /mnt/cache/mirror/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/devel/gpc-2.95_2.95.3-8.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) This is the error, greetings, Sergio. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux TodoSCSI 2.4.2-04 #1 mié mar 14 00:07:01 CET 2001 i686 --- Received: (at 90370-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2001 20:31:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 28 14:31:24 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14iMbD-0002YF-00; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:31:23 -0600 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA29107; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:24:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id WAA15023; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:24:37 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:24:37 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-2.95-2.95.3-9 X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fixed in gcc-2.95-2.95.3-9
Bug#90355: marked as done (Upstream changelog missing)
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:12:17 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#90355: Upstream changelog missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2001 23:04:41 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 17:04:41 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from (localhost) [12.44.140.127]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14f8hd-0003Jm-00; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:04:41 -0600
Received: from gbsadler by localhost with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14f8hb-0008LB-00; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:04:39 -0600
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:04:39 -0600
From: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Upstream changelog missing
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
Sender: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.3-8
Severity: normal
I checked {cpp,gcc}, {cpp,gcc}-2.95, and {cpp,gcc}-2.95-doc. Can't find any
trace of
upstream changelogs. I checked libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 and
libstdc++2.10-dev as well.
Gordon Sadler
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux home-desktop 2.4.2-ac1 #3 Mon Feb 26 04:50:16 CST 2001 i686
Versions of packages gcc-2.95 depends on:
ii binutils 2.11.90.0.1-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-2.95 1:2.95.3-8The GNU C preprocessor.
ii gcc1:2.95.3-5The GNU C compiler.
ii libc6 2.2.2-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
---
Received: (at 90355-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2001 11:14:52 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 01 06:14:52 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14jfoq-00046Z-00; Sun, 01 Apr 2001 06:14:52 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22633;
Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:12:18 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id NAA21762;
Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:12:17 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:12:17 +0200 (MEST)
To: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#90355: Upstream changelog missing
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gordon Sadler writes:
I tend to close the report without including the upstream
changelogs. Other votes?
I can agree with this. I was not thinking of the repercussions, just
seemed odd that it was missing.
Maybe a modified/cut-down changelog could be shipped? With a note in
README.Debian that it is a partial log, the full log is available via
apt-get source.
I added the comment to the README.Debian.
Bug#90390: marked as done (gcc-2.95: builds binary-indep packages in binary-arch target)
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:09:18 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.3-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2001 05:37:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 23:37:34 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cr722548-a.crdva1.bc.wave.home.com (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.115.203.90] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14fEpq-0002fT-00; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:37:34 -0600 Received: from cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.0.2]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id VAA07191; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:37:32 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: straylight.cyberhqz.com: Host [EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.0.2] claimed to be cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com Received: by cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D38FA7806; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:37:32 -0800 (PST) From: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-2.95: builds binary-indep packages in binary-arch target To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:37:32 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.3-6 and 1:2.95.3-8 Severity: normal build daemons only call the build-arch target, and generate a changes file only for the binary-arch packages. gcc-2.95 builds cpp-2.95-doc, g77-2.95-doc, and gcc-2.95-doc when the binary-arch target is called, resulting in wasted cpu cycles on the build daemons, and packages that hang around the build directory, as they aren't included in the upload. --- Received: (at 90390-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2001 11:14:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 01 06:14:49 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14jfon-00046Z-00; Sun, 01 Apr 2001 06:14:49 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22444; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:09:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id NAA21605; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:09:18 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:09:18 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-2.95.3-10 X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fixed in gcc-2.95.3-10
Bug#92022: marked as done (Change to Suggests)
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:09:18 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.3-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2001 18:06:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 28 12:06:06 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (localhost) [12.44.140.127] ([9pn01hHUHEDy76KKUFwHv/laSNYKaa95]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14iKKb-0004LE-00; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:06:06 -0600 Received: from gbsadler by localhost with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14iKKY-pK-00; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:06:02 -0600 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:06:02 -0600 From: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Change to Suggests Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 Sender: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.3-8 Severity: normal Spotted by apt-cache unmet. Currently you Suggests: task-devel, which is not available. Perhaps you mean task-c-dev or task-devel-common? Gordon Sadler -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux home-desktop 2.4.2-ac25 #1 Mon Mar 26 12:07:21 CST 2001 i686 Versions of packages gcc-2.95 depends on: ii binutils 2.11.90.0.1-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii cpp-2.95 1:2.95.3-8The GNU C preprocessor. ii gcc1:2.95.3-5The GNU C compiler. ii libc6 2.2.2-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an --- Received: (at 92022-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2001 11:14:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 01 06:14:50 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14jfon-00046Z-00; Sun, 01 Apr 2001 06:14:49 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22444; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:09:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id NAA21605; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:09:18 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:09:18 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-2.95.3-10 X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fixed in gcc-2.95.3-10
Bug#92153: marked as done (gcc-2.95: fails to build)
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:15:50 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 2.95.3-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2001 04:08:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 29 22:08:39 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cr722548-a.crdva1.bc.wave.home.com (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.115.203.90] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14iqDG-00047D-00; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:08:38 -0600 Received: from cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.0.2]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id UAA32684; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 20:08:36 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: straylight.cyberhqz.com: Host [EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.0.2] claimed to be cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com Received: by cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5BB0FA78CB; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 20:08:36 -0800 (PST) From: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-2.95: fails to build To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 20:08:36 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.3-9 Severity: serious gcc-2.95 fails to build on at least mips and sparc with: dh_installchangelogs -a -Nprotoize-2.95-arch-% -Nlibstdc++2.10-dev-arch-% \ -Nlibg++2.8.1.3-dev-arch-% -Nlibstdc++2.10-dbg-arch-% -Nlibg++2.8.1.3-dbg-arch-% -Ngcc-2.95 -Ncpp-2.95 -Ncpp-2.95-doc -Ng++-2.95 -Nprotoize-2.95 -Ngobjc-2.95 -Ng77-2.95 -Ng77-2.95-doc -Nchill-2.95 -Nlibstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 -Nlibstdc++2.10-dev -Nlibstdc++2.10-dbg -Nlibg++2.8.1.3-glibc2.2 -Nlibg++2.8.1.3-dev -Nlibg++2.8.1.3-dbg -Ngcc-2.95-doc dh_installchangelogs: I have no package to build make[1]: *** [stamps/07-binary-stamp-arch-%] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/buildd/build/gcc-2.95-2.95.3.ds5' make: *** [stamps/07-binary-stamp-arch-%] Error 2 --- Received: (at 92153-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2001 11:19:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 01 06:19:04 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14jfsu-0004Hz-00; Sun, 01 Apr 2001 06:19:04 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22786 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:15:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id NAA22038; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:15:50 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:15:50 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in 2.95.3-10 X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fixed in 2.95.3-10
Processed: Fixed in NMU of gcc272 2.7.2.3-18
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 12375 + fixed
Bug#12375: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: -O2 produces bad code !
Tags added: fixed
tag 20606 + fixed
Bug#20606: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: register variable corruption
Tags added: fixed
tag 20889 + fixed
Bug#20889: [Fixed in upstream {gcc,egcc}-2.92.21] Inconsistent results got by
gcc-optimized code
Tags added: fixed
tag 24788 + fixed
Bug#24788: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc with -save-temps does not compile
Tags added: fixed
tag 26100 + fixed
Bug#26100: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: -dynamic is not default as it should
be
Tags added: fixed
tag 34322 + fixed
Bug#34322: [Fix in gcc-2.9x] [m68k] gcc-2.7.2.3-7 miscompiles
apcalc_2.10.3t5.46-1
Tags added: fixed
tag 4429 + fixed
Bug#4429: [Fixed in {gcc,egcc}-2.92.21] gcc argument validation could be better
Tags added: fixed
tag 4430 + fixed
Bug#4430: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc -O coredumps
Tags added: fixed
tag 48726 + fixed
Bug#48726: [fixed in gcc-2.9[67] branch] kernel 2.3.2[34] compiled with this
gcc will not swap
Tags added: fixed
tag 5367 + fixed
Bug#5367: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc -O2 fails for INT_MIN long long
INT_MAX
Tags added: fixed
tag 54544 + fixed
Bug#54544: Missing definitions in /usr/include/asm/io.h
Tags added: fixed
tag 6047 + fixed
Bug#6047: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] badly initialized union in gcc include file
Tags added: fixed
tag 63154 + fixed
Bug#63154: gcc 2.7.2.3 optimizer bug for long long comparisons
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#92526: marked as done (glibc missing vital component)
Your message dated Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:34:38 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#92526: glibc missing vital component
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2001 07:15:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 02 02:15:36 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mercury.linuxguru.net (comet.linuxguru.net) [63.197.220.106]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14jyYq-00014E-00; Mon, 02 Apr 2001 02:15:36 -0500
Received: from jblack by comet.linuxguru.net with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14jyXH-YU-00; Mon, 02 Apr 2001 00:13:59 -0700
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:13:59 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: glibc missing vital component
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
From: James Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
Version: 2.91.66-4
Date; 1 April 2001
When attempting to cheat on my algebra homework, I attempted to square
some numbers via the sqrt (see man 3 sqrt) function. Howevever, the
following c program fails to compile:
#include math.h
main() {
double i=9;double j;
j = sqrt(i);
return 0;
}
Output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc test.c -o test
/tmp/cc49CcOy.o: In function `main':
/tmp/cc49CcOy.o(.text+0x1c): undefined reference to `sqrt'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Results: I will fail my algebra test, become a bum, and never figure out
what times itself is 9, thereby ending my budding tic-tac-toe professional
career, and reducing me to a life of rotgut and warm exaust grates.
Suggested Resolution:
Immediately withdraw all versions of libstdc from all Debian GNU
distributions, and all packages dependant upon glibc until such time as
either the manual page for sqrt is correct, or sqrt is indeed collected.
The good news is that Debian GNU will once again fit upon one CD. :)
--
Please consider encrypting emails to this address with gnupg
Key available by email, or from www.keyserver.net
K:1024D/06357400 FP:AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
---
Received: (at 92526-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2001 07:34:51 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 02 02:34:51 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from vitelus.com [64.81.36.147]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14jyrT-0001zS-00; Mon, 02 Apr 2001 02:34:51 -0500
Received: from aaronl by vitelus.com with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14jyrG-00075l-00; Mon, 02 Apr 2001 00:34:38 -0700
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:34:38 -0700
From: Aaron Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: James Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#92526: glibc missing vital component
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, Apr 02, 2001
at 12:13:59AM -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing this bug.
I suggest using -lm when compiling it to link in the math library.
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:13:59AM -0700, James Blackwell wrote:
When attempting to cheat on my algebra homework, I attempted to square
some numbers via the sqrt (see man 3 sqrt) function.
I used to do things like perl -e 'print sqrt 41' before I got
Mathematica. Much faster than writing a C program.
Howevever, the
following c program fails to compile:
If it's C why did you file a bug on libstdc++?
Processed: Re: Bug#93226: Optimisation bug when building gnome-pim 1.4.0 with -O2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 93226 libglib1.2 Bug#93226: Optimisation bug when building gnome-pim 1.4.0 with -O2 Bug reassigned from package `gcc-2.95' to `libglib1.2'. rename 93266 Bit tests are redefined when G_CAN_INLINE is defined (in glib.h) Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#12375: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: -O2 produces bad code !)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 1997 21:07:51 +
Received: (qmail 18784 invoked from network); 29 Aug 1997 21:07:35 -
Received: from ppp-43.a2points.com (HELO bylbo.nowhere.earth) ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]@195.10.6.43)
by 205.229.104.5 with SMTP; 29 Aug 1997 21:07:35 -
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bylbo.nowhere.earth (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA00813;
Fri, 29 Aug 1997 23:10:45 +0200
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 23:10:45 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc: -O2 produces bad code !
X-Mailer: VM 6.32 under Emacs 19.34.1
Reply-To: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=Multipart_Fri_Aug_29_23:10:17_1997-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--Multipart_Fri_Aug_29_23:10:17_1997-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Package: gcc
Version: 2.7.2.2-5
This bug should probably be forwarded upstream.
-O2 optimization may cause erroneous code to be produced. Whether the bug
is triggered is highly context-dependant, and the included bug.c is near
minimal. The bug occurs on line 25 (for...); when suppressing lines
immediately preceding/following this one, the bug doesn't show.
What happens is that argv is incremented by 4, just as if argv++ has
been written.
-O1 doesn't produce this behaviour, as demonstrated by the showbug script.
the bug was reproduced on 2 debian machines.
debian versions of software used:
gcc 2.7.2.1-2 2.7.2.2-5
libc5 5.4.33-3N/A
libc6 N/A 2.0.4-1
binutils 2.7-3 2.8.1-1
ldso 1.8.5-1 1.9.2-1
Fortunately, it seems easy to reproduce
attached files are:
bug.c small C program influenced by the bug
.gdbinitgdb script running the program and displaying
influenced data
showbug sh script showing the bug
--
Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alt-email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://monge.univ-mlv.fr/~dirson
--Multipart_Fri_Aug_29_23:10:17_1997-1
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=bug.c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
#include errno.h
#include stdio.h
#include sys/kd.h
#include fcntl.h
#include sys/ioctl.h
#include unistd.h
#define VERSION 1
char *progname;
int verbose = 0;
int getfd() {
return 0;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int fd, i;
progname = argv[0];
fd = getfd();
for (i = 1; i argc; i++)
{
if (!strcmp(argv[i], -V))
printf(%s version %s\n, progname, VERSION);
else if (!strcmp(argv[i], -v))
verbose = 1;
}
return 0;
}
--Multipart_Fri_Aug_29_23:10:17_1997-1
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=.gdbinit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
list 25
break 25
run an_arg
echo argv is:
print argv
next
echo argv is:
print argv
quit
--Multipart_Fri_Aug_29_23:10:17_1997-1
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=showbug
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
#!/bin/sh
echo 'Compiling demos...'
gcc -g -O1 bug.c -o bugO1
gcc -g -O2 bug.c -o bugO2
echo 'Showing correct results (-O1)...'
gdb bugO1
echo 'Showing buggy results (-O2)...'
gdb bugO2
--Multipart_Fri_Aug_29_23:10:17_1997-1--
---
Received: (at 12375-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 21:58:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:58:24 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14np6d-0003Xr-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:58:24 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08192;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:53:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA19323;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bug#20606: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: register variable corruption)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 1998 15:12:05 +
Received: (qmail 31406 invoked from network); 3 Apr 1998 15:11:55 -
Received: from ppp-42.a2points.com (HELO ppp37.a2points.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 3 Apr 1998 15:11:55 -
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by ppp37.a2points.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id QAA13760;
Fri, 3 Apr 1998 16:35:01 +0200
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 16:35:01 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian bug-system submission [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc: register variable corruption
X-Mailer: VM 6.42 under Emacs 19.34.1
Package: gcc
Version: 2.7.2.3-3
[ARCH is i386]
libc: 2.0.6-3
binutils: 2.8.1.0.19-1
It seems gcc (I guess it's the one responsible here, either for
compiling my program, or libc) does strange things. It may well be
that it has been fixed in more recent versions, but as it may not, and
some new side-effects may hide it, I report anyway.
I'll upgrade libc+binutils to the latest from hamm or incoming, and
will try egcs too.
[note: there may be a bug it use of getline(), but that should not be
relevant to the bug I report here ;]
Here's the relevant code:
int sfm_fallback_read (FILE* f, unicode** *sfmf, unsigned *size)
{
char* buf = NULL;
ssize_t buf_size = 0;
ssize_t buf_read;
[...]
while (!feof(f))
{
[...]
if ((buf_read = getline (buf, buf_size, f)) == -1)
{
if (feof(f))/* should not modify errno */
break;
else if (errno == EINTR)
[...]
}
[...]
}
Here's gdb output:
GNU gdb 4.16.86
[...]
61if ((buf_read = getline (buf, buf_size, f)) == -1)
(gdb)
63if (feof(f))
(gdb) p buf_read
$1 = -1
(gdb) n
65else if (errno == EINTR)
(gdb) p buf_read
$2 = 0
(gdb) p buf_read
Address requested for identifier buf_read which is in a register.
(gdb) p f
$3 = (_IO_FILE **) 0xbfffef34
(gdb) p buf_size
$4 = (int *) 0xbfffef24
For some getline() reason, the *register* buf_read is set to -1. Let's
accept this. Then the call to eof() seems to alter this register.
FWIW, let's have a closer look:
* from info registers, I see that buf_read is stored in EAX
* from idem, line 63 - EIP=0x4001f7d8 ; line 65 - EIP=0x4001f7e9
(gdb) disassemble 0x4001f7d8 0x4001f7e9
Dump of assembler code from 0x4001f7d8 to 0x4001f7e9:
0x4001f7d8 sfm_fallback_read+328: pushl %edi
0x4001f7d9 sfm_fallback_read+329: call 0x4001de2c _init+172
0x4001f7de sfm_fallback_read+334: addl $0x4,%esp
0x4001f7e1 sfm_fallback_read+337: testl %eax,%eax
0x4001f7e3 sfm_fallback_read+339: jne0x4001f9c0
sfm_fallback_read+816
* using nexti, it appears the value gets modified in the call() -
which does not seem to call eof() ?
(gdb) display buf_read
1: buf_read = -1
(gdb) nexti
0x4001f7d9 63if (feof(f))/*
should not modify errno */
1: buf_read = -1
(gdb)
0x4001f7de 63if (feof(f))/*
should not modify errno */
1: buf_read = 0
(gdb) p feof
$8 = (text variable, no debug info *) 0x4005fe00 feof
--
Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Stop making M$-Bill richer richer,
alt-email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | more powerful, more stable !
http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 | Check http://www.debian.org/
---
Received: (at 20606-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 21:58:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:58:24 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14np6d-0003Xr-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:58:24 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08192;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:53:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA19323;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39
Bug#24788: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc with -save-temps does not compile)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 1998 13:36:13 +
Received: (qmail 10703 invoked from network); 20 Jul 1998 13:36:06 -
Received: from usr35.web4u.com.br (HELO cesarb1.cesarb.personal.net) ([EMAIL
PROTECTED])
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 20 Jul 1998 13:36:06 -
Received: by cesarb.personal.net
via sendmail from stdin
id [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Smail3.2.0.101)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 20 Jul 1998 10:31:59 -0300 (EST)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 10:31:59 -0300 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc with -save-temps does not compile
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc
Version: 2.7.2.3-4.8
When I try to compile a trivial program (hello.c) with -save-temps, it does not
compile. Using the same command without -save-temps, everything works.
You can see that cc1 is overwriting its own input file. Also, the file names
are wrong: the cpp output must be hello.i, the cc1 output should be hello.s.
$ gcc -W -Wall -O3 -pg -a -g3 hello.c -o hello -save-temps -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3/specs
gcc version 2.7.2.3
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3/cpp -lang-c -v -undef -D__GNUC__=2
-D__GNUC_MINOR__=7 -D__ELF__ -Dunix -Di386 -Dlinux -D__ELF__ -D__unix__
-D__i386__ -D__linux__ -D__unix -D__i386 -D__linux -Asystem(unix)
-Asystem(posix) -Acpu(i386) -Amachine(i386) -D__OPTIMIZE__ -g3 -W -Wall hello.c
hello
GNU CPP version 2.7.2.3 (i386 Linux/ELF)
#include ... search starts here:
#include ... search starts here:
/usr/local/include
/usr/i486-linux/include
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3/cc1 hello -quiet -dumpbase hello.c -a -g3
-O3 -W -Wall -version -p -o hello
GNU C version 2.7.2.3 (i386 Linux/ELF) compiled by GNU C version 2.7.2.3.
as -V -Qy hello -o hello.o
GNU assembler version 2.9.1 (i486-linux), using BFD version 2.9.1
ld -m elf_i386 -dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -o hello /usr/lib/gcrt1.o
/usr/lib/crti.o /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3/crtbegin.o
-L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3 hello.o -lgcc -lc -lgcc
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3/crtend.o /usr/lib/crtn.o
/usr/lib/gcrt1.o(.text+0x36): undefined reference to `main'
Here is the file (hello.c):
--- hello.c ---
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include stdlib.h
#include stdio.h
int main (int argc, const char *argv[argc])
{
fputs (Hello, world!\n, stdout);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
--- END OF FILE ---
I'm using Debian 2.0.
uname -a: Linux cesarb1 2.0.34 #2 Sun Jun 7 13:17:03 EST 1998 i386 unknown
$ dpkg --list gcc libc6 cpp binutils libc6-dev
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ NameVersionDescription
+++-===-==-
ii gcc 2.7.2.3-4.8The GNU C compiler.
ii libc6 2.0.7t-1 The GNU C library version 2 (run-time files)
ii cpp 2.7.2.3-4.8The GNU C preprocessor.
ii binutils2.9.1-0.2 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti
ii libc6-dev 2.0.7t-1 The GNU C library version 2 (development fil
---
Received: (at 24788-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 21:58:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:58:24 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14np6d-0003Xr-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:58:24 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08192;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:53:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA19323;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL
Bug#26100: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: -dynamic is not default as it should be)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 1998 19:37:07 + Received: (qmail 22859 invoked from network); 24 Aug 1998 19:37:05 - Received: from bittersweet.inetarena.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 24 Aug 1998 19:37:05 - Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bittersweet.inetarena.com (8.9.1/8.9.1/Debian/GNU) id MAA21210; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 12:37:02 -0700 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 12:37:02 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc: -dynamic is not default as it should be To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.1.6 Package: gcc Version: 2.7.2.3-4.8 Severity: critical `gcc' is creating staticly linked .so files. `egcc' works correctly. (as output by `libtool', with incorrect -Wl,-soname... also) % gcc -shared -Wl,-soname -Wl,libguile.so.3 -o .libs/libguile.so.3.0.0 alist.lo arbiters.lo async.lo boolean.lo chars.lo continuations.lo dynl.lo dynwind.lo eq.lo error.lo eval.lo feature.lo filesys.lo fports.lo gc.lo gdbint.lo genio.lo gh_data.lo gh_eval.lo gh_funcs.lo gh_init.lo gh_io.lo gh_list.lo gh_predicates.lo gsubr.lo hash.lo hashtab.lo init.lo ioext.lo kw.lo list.lo load.lo mallocs.lo markers.lo net_db.lo numbers.lo objects.lo objprop.lo options.lo pairs.lo ports.lo posix.lo print.lo procprop.lo procs.lo ramap.lo read.lo readline.lo root.lo scmsigs.lo script.lo simpos.lo smob.lo socket.lo stackchk.lo stime.lo strings.lo strop.lo strorder.lo strports.lo struct.lo symbols.lo tag.lo throw.lo unif.lo variable.lo vectors.lo version.lo vports.lo weaks.lo fluids.lo regex-posix.lo backtrace.lo stacks.lo debug.lo srcprop.lo threads.lo iselect.lo -ldl -lreadline -lm -lc -lc % ldd .libs/libguile.so.3.0.0 statically linked (corrected, by hand) % gcc -shared -dynamic '-Wl,-soname=libguile.so.3' -o .libs/libguile.so.3.0.0 alist.lo arbiters.lo async.lo boolean.lo chars.lo continuations.lo dynl.lo dynwind.lo eq.lo error.lo eval.lo feature.lo filesys.lo fports.lo gc.lo gdbint.lo genio.lo gh_data.lo gh_eval.lo gh_funcs.lo gh_init.lo gh_io.lo gh_list.lo gh_predicates.lo gsubr.lo hash.lo hashtab.lo init.lo ioext.lo kw.lo list.lo load.lo mallocs.lo markers.lo net_db.lo numbers.lo objects.lo objprop.lo options.lo pairs.lo ports.lo posix.lo print.lo procprop.lo procs.lo ramap.lo read.lo readline.lo root.lo scmsigs.lo script.lo simpos.lo smob.lo socket.lo stackchk.lo stime.lo strings.lo strop.lo strorder.lo strports.lo struct.lo symbols.lo tag.lo throw.lo unif.lo variable.lo vectors.lo version.lo vports.lo weaks.lo fluids.lo regex-posix.lo backtrace.lo stacks.lo debug.lo srcprop.lo threads.lo iselect.lo -ldl -lreadline -lm -lc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/Scheme/Guile/guile-core/libguile % ldd .libs/libguile.so.3.0.0 libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40074000) libreadline.so.2 = /lib/libreadline.so.2 (0x40077000) libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x400a2000) libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400bd000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x) libncurses.so.3.4 = /lib/libncurses.so.3.4 (0x40162000) You have new mail. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/Scheme/Guile/guile-core/libguile (and now without the `-dynamic', but using `egcc') % egcc -shared '-Wl,-soname=libguile.so.3' -o .libs/libguile.so.3.0.0 alist.lo arbiters.lo async.lo boolean.lo chars.lo continuations.lo dynl.lo dynwind.lo eq.lo error.lo eval.lo feature.lo filesys.lo fports.lo gc.lo gdbint.lo genio.lo gh_data.lo gh_eval.lo gh_funcs.lo gh_init.lo gh_io.lo gh_list.lo gh_predicates.lo gsubr.lo hash.lo hashtab.lo init.lo ioext.lo kw.lo list.lo load.lo mallocs.lo markers.lo net_db.lo numbers.lo objects.lo objprop.lo options.lo pairs.lo ports.lo posix.lo print.lo procprop.lo procs.lo ramap.lo read.lo readline.lo root.lo scmsigs.lo script.lo simpos.lo smob.lo socket.lo stackchk.lo stime.lo strings.lo strop.lo strorder.lo strports.lo struct.lo symbols.lo tag.lo throw.lo unif.lo variable.lo vectors.lo version.lo vports.lo weaks.lo fluids.lo regex-posix.lo backtrace.lo stacks.lo debug.lo srcprop.lo threads.lo iselect.lo -ldl -lreadline -lm -lc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/Scheme/Guile/guile-core/libguile % ldd .libs/libguile.so.3.0.0 libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40075000) libreadline.so.2 = /lib/libreadline.so.2 (0x40078000)
Bug#34322: marked as done ([Fix in gcc-2.9x] [m68k] gcc-2.7.2.3-7 miscompiles apcalc_2.10.3t5.46-1)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 1999 13:47:38 + Received: (qmail 18211 invoked from network); 10 Mar 1999 13:47:24 - Received: from faui20.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (131.188.32.20) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 1999 13:47:24 - Received: from faui22c.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui22c.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.32.72]) by faui20.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.8.8/8.1.6-FAU) with ESMTP id OAA03435; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:49:03 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by faui22c.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.8.8/8.1.6-FAU) id OAA06372; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:47:12 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:47:12 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Roman Hodek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apcalc_2.10.3t5.46-1: Regression test fails on m68k Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: apcalc Version: 2.10.3t5.46-1 Since upstream version 2.10.3t5.46 apcalc doesn't build anymore on m68k, since it fails the regression test. (2.10.3t5.45 did fine; but I can't remember if that version already included a test.) The error messages are: make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/build/buildd/apcalc-2.10.3t5.46' CALCPATH=./lib ./calc -i -q read regress 21 | awk -f check.awk 2027: lfactor(2^19-1,1) == 1 2028: lfactor(2^31-1,1) == 1 2029: lfactor(2^32-5,1) == 1 Non-true result (0): 2030: lfactor(2^38+7,5) == 1 2031: lfactor(1009^2,pix(1009)) == 1009 2032: lfactor(1009^2,pix(1009)-1) == 1 2033: lfactor(65519*65521,7000) == 65519 Non-true result (0): 2034: lfactor(65521^2,pix(65521)) == 65521 2035: lfactor(65521^2,pix(65521)-1) == 1 2036: lfactor(524309^6,10) == 524309 2037: Ending prime builtins test 3500: Beginning test_frem 3501: frem/fcnt: *** Failure 7 on loop 1 *** Failure 2 on loop 2 *** Failure 7 on loop 14 *** Failure 7 on loop 20 *** Failure 7 on loop 25 *** Failure 2 on loop 34 *** Failure 7 on loop 55 *** Failure 2 on loop 63 *** Failure 2 on loop 65 *** Failure 7 on loop 78 *** Failure 7 on loop 80 *** Failure 7 on loop 81 *** Failure 7 on loop 102 *** Failure 2 on loop 110 *** Failure 2 on loop 111 *** Failure 7 on loop 118 *** Failure 7 on loop 125 *** Failure 2 on loop 142 *** Failure 7 on loop 146 *** Failure 7 on loop 147 *** Failure 2 on loop 172 *** Failure 7 on loop 181 *** 22 error(s) 3502: gcdrem: no errors 3503: gcdrem #2: no errors 3504: Ending test_frem 8216: inverse(1/0) == 0 8217: Ending test_somenew() 2 error(s) found \/++\/ : Ending regression tests make[1]: *** [chk] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/build/buildd/apcalc-2.10.3t5.46' I've looked a bit at the sources, but didn't find any clue what's happening, sorry. If you need assistance if form of access to a m68k machine, I can help you. Roman --- Received: (at 34322-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 21:58:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:58:24 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14np6d-0003Xr-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:58:24 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08192; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:53:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA19323; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing gcc272 bugs X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc272 (2.7.2.3-18) unstable; urgency=low * Close all gcc272 in the Debian bug tracking archive. The use of gcc272 is deprecated. The
Bug#4429: marked as done ([Fixed in {gcc,egcc}-2.92.21] gcc argument validation could be better)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 1996 05:38:46 + Received: (qmail-queue invoked from smtpd); 7 Sep 1996 05:32:16 - Received: from dilbert.adj.com (206.190.9.2) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 1996 05:32:16 - Received: from beagle.pixar.com (beagle.pixar.com [138.72.120.70]) by dilbert.adj.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA16277 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 7 Sep 1996 00:25:50 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Sep 1996 00:25:50 -0500 Received: by beagle.pixar.com (8.7.5) id VAA02250; Fri, 6 Sep 1996 21:38:17 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc argument validation could be better Package: gcc echo foo.c gcc -Aa foo.c *Initialization*:1: missing token-sequence in `#assert' I guess this is worth forwarding to the upstream maintainer. GCC could validate the format of the -A flag better. The message currently generated by a badly-formatted argument is less than informative. Thanks Bruce --- Received: (at 4429-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 21:58:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:58:24 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14np6d-0003Xr-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:58:24 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08192; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:53:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA19323; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing gcc272 bugs X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc272 (2.7.2.3-18) unstable; urgency=low * Close all gcc272 in the Debian bug tracking archive. The use of gcc272 is deprecated. The only reason it exists is to have a compiler for the linux kernel 2.0.x. The bug reports for gcc272 are still available on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=gcc272archive=yes Closes: #4429, #4430, 4954, #5367, #6047, #12375, #20606, #20889, #24788, #26100, #34322, #48726, #54544, #63154.
Bug#4430: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc -O coredumps)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 1996 07:18:44 +
Received: (qmail-queue invoked from smtpd); 7 Sep 1996 07:07:25 -
Received: from greathan.apana.org.au ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 1996 07:07:22 -
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by greathan.apana.org.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
QAA10018 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 7 Sep 1996 16:08:33 +1000
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc -O coredumps
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian-bugs)
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 1996 16:08:33 +1000 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: gcc
Version: 2.7.2.1-1
Compiling the attached file with the -O flag kills cc1.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 1.1 is out! { http://www.debian.org/ }
A. B = True B. A = False
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any other key sites
--
void f()
{
double a;
int b;
do
{
if (b a) g(a, b);
else break;
}; /* note the missing while */
}
---
Received: (at 4430-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 21:58:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:58:24 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14np6d-0003Xr-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:58:24 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08192;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:53:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA19323;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing gcc272 bugs
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc272 (2.7.2.3-18) unstable; urgency=low
* Close all gcc272 in the Debian bug tracking archive. The use of
gcc272 is deprecated. The only reason it exists is to have a
compiler for the linux kernel 2.0.x.
The bug reports for gcc272 are still available on
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=gcc272archive=yes
Closes: #4429, #4430, 4954, #5367, #6047, #12375, #20606, #20889,
#24788, #26100, #34322, #48726, #54544, #63154.
Bug#48726: marked as done ([fixed in gcc-2.9[67] branch] kernel 2.3.2[34] compiled with this gcc will not swap)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 1999 14:07:13 + Received: (qmail 12384 invoked from network); 30 Oct 1999 14:07:11 - Received: from ps16alo.willinet.net (HELO mharnois.workgroup.net) (198.49.28.113) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 30 Oct 1999 14:07:11 - Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mharnois.workgroup.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id JAA28473; Sat, 30 Oct 1999 09:07:05 -0500 Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 09:07:05 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Michael Harnois [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc: kernel 2.3.2[34] compiled with this gcc will not swap To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.2.6 Package: gcc Version: 1:2.95.2-1 Severity: grave Kernels compiled with this gcc oops in the swapper. The problem does not occur when the same kernels are compiled with gcc272. -- System Information Debian Release: potato Kernel Version: Linux mharnois.workgroup.net 2.3.24 #50 Thu Oct 28 17:01:35 CDT 1999 i686 unknown Versions of the packages gcc depends on: ii binutils2.9.5.0.16-2 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti ii cpp 2.95.2-1 The GNU C preprocessor. ii libc6 2.1.2-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone --- Received: (at 48726-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 21:58:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:58:25 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14np6d-0003Xr-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:58:24 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08192; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:53:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA19323; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing gcc272 bugs X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc272 (2.7.2.3-18) unstable; urgency=low * Close all gcc272 in the Debian bug tracking archive. The use of gcc272 is deprecated. The only reason it exists is to have a compiler for the linux kernel 2.0.x. The bug reports for gcc272 are still available on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=gcc272archive=yes Closes: #4429, #4430, 4954, #5367, #6047, #12375, #20606, #20889, #24788, #26100, #34322, #48726, #54544, #63154.
Bug#4954: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] cc -pipe hangs)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 1996 12:02:24 + Received: (qmail 6276 invoked from smtpd); 25 Oct 1996 12:02:19 - Received: from unknown (HELO earth.orbits.com) (198.80.100.14) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Oct 1996 12:02:16 - Received: (qmail 2332 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Oct 1996 13:20:58 - Date: 15 Oct 1996 13:20:58 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cc -pipe hangs Package: gcc Version: 2.7.2.1-1 gcc -pipe -c blah.s -o blah.o will hang indefinitely with as trying to read from stdin (hitting control-Z then bg results in a Stopped (tty input) message. [Note that I've re-installed gcc by hand after removing gnat.] [Note that as is getting the arguments -Qy -o blah.o blah.s -, but it's cc's responsibility to condition as's stdin.] -- Raul --- Received: (at 4954-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 21:58:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:58:24 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14np6d-0003Xr-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:58:24 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08192; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:53:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA19323; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing gcc272 bugs X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc272 (2.7.2.3-18) unstable; urgency=low * Close all gcc272 in the Debian bug tracking archive. The use of gcc272 is deprecated. The only reason it exists is to have a compiler for the linux kernel 2.0.x. The bug reports for gcc272 are still available on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=gcc272archive=yes Closes: #4429, #4430, 4954, #5367, #6047, #12375, #20606, #20889, #24788, #26100, #34322, #48726, #54544, #63154.
Bug#5367: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc -O2 fails for INT_MIN long long INT_MAX)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 1996 12:00:39 +
Received: (qmail 16189 invoked from smtpd); 12 Nov 1996 12:00:32 -
Received: from spock.lpr.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 1996 12:00:13 -
Received: from ion.lpr.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[129.187.151.28]) by spock.lpr.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.12/8.6.6) with
ESMTP id MAA29503 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 12:46:06 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by ion.lpr.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de
(8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA28984 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 12:44:17 +0100
From: Herbert Thielen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc -O2 fails for INT_MIN long long INT_MAX
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian BugSubmit)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 12:44:17 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME7a]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: gcc
Version: 2.7.2.1-1
A colleague of mine found that the gcc optimizer for ix86 fails for
long long a;
(a MIN_INT || a MAX_INT) : foo ? bar
You can reproduce the bug with the program at the end of the mail. This
bug was exploited while trying to use a cross-gdb for a 64-bit-processor
on Debian/Linux.
gcc 2.7.2-8 showed this bug too.
The bug was _not_ reproducable on a gcc 2.7.2.1 for
mips-mips-riscos4sysv, so it seem's to be limited on the ix86 optimizer.
Regards
Herbert.
Program to reproduce the bug (o.k. with -O0, buggy with -O1, -O2, -O3):
-snip-snap-snip-snap-
#include stdio.h
#include limits.h
#define LARGE 20
#define CHECK_FALSE(expr) \
printf(%s: #expr \n, \
(expr) ? BUG, assumed true : \
o.k., it is false)
void foo(long long val)
{
printf( val=%Ld (%#Lx)\n
INT_MIN=%d (%#x)\n
INT_MAX=%d (%#x)\n
LARGE=%d (%#x)\n\n,
val, val, INT_MIN, INT_MIN, INT_MAX, INT_MAX, LARGE, LARGE);
CHECK_FALSE(val INT_MIN);
CHECK_FALSE(val INT_MAX);
CHECK_FALSE(val INT_MIN || val INT_MAX);/* Buggy with -O2 !! */
CHECK_FALSE(val -LARGE || val LARGE);
CHECK_FALSE(!(val INT_MIN val INT_MAX));
return;
}
main()
{
long long a;
a = 5LL;
foo(a);
exit(0);
}
-snip-snap-snip-snap-
---
Received: (at 5367-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 21:58:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:58:24 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14np6d-0003Xr-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:58:24 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08192;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:53:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA19323;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing gcc272 bugs
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc272 (2.7.2.3-18) unstable; urgency=low
* Close all gcc272 in the Debian bug tracking archive. The use of
gcc272 is deprecated. The only reason it exists is to have a
compiler for the linux kernel 2.0.x.
The bug reports for gcc272 are still available on
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=gcc272archive=yes
Closes: #4429, #4430, 4954, #5367, #6047, #12375, #20606, #20889,
#24788, #26100, #34322, #48726, #54544, #63154.
Processed: retitle gcc bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 87909 [workaround applied] not installable on the Hurd Bug#87909: not installable on the Hurd Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#54544: marked as done (Missing definitions in /usr/include/asm/io.h)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2000 13:00:08 +
Received: (qmail 24341 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2000 13:00:07 -
Received: from pilt-s.online.no (HELO online.no) (148.122.208.18)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 2000 13:00:07 -
Received: from sskjelln (ti18a66-0136.dialup.online.no [130.67.230.136])
by online.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA02496
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 14:00:04 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2000 13:58:17 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Sigmund Skjelnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Missing definitions in /usr/include/asm/io.h
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: gcc
Version: 2.7.2.3-4.8
C source trying to call inb() and outb() (/usr/include/asm/io.h included )
does not compile, and error codes below are written:
/tmp/ccc00250(.text+0x26): undefined reference to `__inbc'
/tmp/ccc00250(.text+0x46): undefined reference to `__inb'
/tmp/ccc00250(.text+0x71): undefined reference to `__outbc'
/tmp/ccc00250(.text+0x88): undefined reference to `__outb'
/tmp/ccc00250(.text+0x94): undefined reference to `__outbc'
/tmp/ccc00250(.text+0xa5): undefined reference to `__outb'
/tmp/ccc00250(.text+0xd6): undefined reference to `__inbc'
/tmp/ccc00250(.text+0xf6): undefined reference to `__inb'
Here's the source code, I'm trying to use the printer port as a generic I/O
port:
/* termwatch.c=20
080100 Sigmund Skjelnes
Dette programmet viser om pinne 2 p=E5 /dev/lp0 utgangen skifter status
*/
#includestdio.h
#includeasm/io.h
#define base 0x0378U
#define lp_data base=20
#define lp_control (base + 2)
#define IRQFLAG 0x10
#define INIFLAG 4
int main( void ){
int i;
/* sett opp registre */
ioperm( base, 3, 1 ); /* reserver portadresser */
i =3D inb( lp_control );
i |=3D INIFLAG; /* INI flag =3D 1 */
i =3D ~IRQFLAG; /* IRQ flag =3D 0 IRQ brukes ikke */
outb( lp_control, (unsigned char) (i 0xff) );
outb( lp_data, (unsigned char) 0 ); /* leser data reg */
while( 1 ){ //finn en m=E5te =E5 stoppe programmet kontrollert p=E5!
if ( inb( lp_data ) =3D=3D 1 ){
printf( Bryter =E5pen\r\n );
}
else {
printf( Bryter lukket\r\n );
}
sleep( 1 ); /* 1s */
}
ioperm( base, 3, 0 ); /* fjern reservasjon */
}
Obviously, the code for __outp etc. is missing, hence the linker can't find
the function definition. It's possible the source code should have been
linked to something, but this is unlikely.
The source are compiled the usual way:=20
gcc -o termwatch termwatch.c
kernel: Linux debian 2.0.34 #2=20
C library: libc-2.0.7.so
Hope you're able to solve the problem, others claim that this code should
compile and work fine.
Cincerely, Sigmund.
---
Received: (at 54544-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 21:58:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:58:25 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14np6d-0003Xr-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:58:24 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08192;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:53:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA19323;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing gcc272 bugs
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc272 (2.7.2.3-18) unstable; urgency=low
* Close all gcc272 in the
Bug#63154: marked as done (gcc 2.7.2.3 optimizer bug for long long comparisons)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing gcc272 bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2000 16:39:15 +
Received: (qmail 6648 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2000 16:39:14 -
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 27 Apr 2000 16:39:14 -
Received: from richard by chiark.greenend.org.uk with local-bsmtp (Exim 2.05 #1)
id 12krJo-0008Br-00 (Debian); Thu, 27 Apr 2000 17:39:12 +0100
Received: from lyonesse.relativity.greenend.org.uk [172.18.45.66] (mail)
by sfere.greenend.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 12kqjE-0004C2-00; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 17:01:24 +0100
Received: from richard by lyonesse.relativity.greenend.org.uk with local (Exim
2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 12kqjD-0002gR-00; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 17:01:23 +0100
From: Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 17:01:23 +0100 (BST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc 2.7.2.3 optimizer bug for long long comparisons
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc
Version: 2.7.2.3-7
Here's my test source file:
lyonesse$ cat t.c
#include limits.h
void tryit(long long longvalue, int boringvalue) {
if(longvalue LONG_MIN || longvalue LONG_MAX)
abort();
}
main() {
tryit(-3, 1);
exit(0);
}
With gcc 2.7.2.3, the optimizer gets it wrong, and so abort() is
called when it shouldn't be:
lyonesse$ gcc -O2 -o t t.c ./t
Aborted (core dumped)
lyonesse$ gcc -O1 -o t t.c ./t
Aborted (core dumped)
lyonesse$ gcc -O0 -o t t.c ./t
lyonesse$ gcc --version
2.7.2.3
egcs however gets it right:
lyonesse$ egcc -O2 -o t t.c ./t
lyonesse$ egcc -O1 -o t t.c ./t
lyonesse$ egcc -O0 -o t t.c ./t
lyonesse$ egcc --version
egcs-2.91.66
If the gcc 2.7 series is dead I suppose this can be fairly safely
ignored. If it's still required for some things (linux kernel
compiles?) then it ought to be fixed however...
ttfn/rjk
---
Received: (at 63154-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 21:58:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:58:25 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14np6d-0003Xr-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:58:24 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA08192;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:53:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA19323;
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing gcc272 bugs
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc272 (2.7.2.3-18) unstable; urgency=low
* Close all gcc272 in the Debian bug tracking archive. The use of
gcc272 is deprecated. The only reason it exists is to have a
compiler for the linux kernel 2.0.x.
The bug reports for gcc272 are still available on
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=gcc272archive=yes
Closes: #4429, #4430, 4954, #5367, #6047, #12375, #20606, #20889,
#24788, #26100, #34322, #48726, #54544, #63154.
Bug#68452: marked as done (ash gets miscompiled on sparc32 with -O2)
Your message dated Fri, 13 Apr 2001 00:12:40 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc bug (ash on sparc) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2000 13:29:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 03 08:29:09 2000 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from koenig.isr.uni-stuttgart.de (koenig) [129.69.33.94] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian)) id 13KL3d-00048N-00; Thu, 03 Aug 2000 08:29:09 -0500 Received: from chris by koenig with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13KL3V-eM-00; Thu, 03 Aug 2000 15:29:01 +0200 From: Christian Meder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ash gets miscompiled on sparc32 with -O2 X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54 X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54 Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 15:29:01 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc Version: 1:2.95.2-13 Severity: normal ash which is needed for the boot floppies gets miscompiled for sparc32 when compiled with -O2. The report which is included below is the description of my debugging session when debugging a boot floppy problem on sparc32 with Erik Andersen. Ok so here's my debugging story for the problem: I started by trying your suggestion to strace the mount of proc. Copied strace into the root image, copied libnsl, compressed it again, wrote it to floppy. rebooted and oh joy: strace segfaulted too ;-) Next try: switch to the second console of the installation and start strace manually. Complains that it's missing a symbol which is probably stripped out by the library reduction, urgh :-( Started playing around with the console and got closer to the core of the problem. Only two out of four command invocations from the ash shell are executed the rest does just segfault. Now that we know the culprit I returned to my good old desktop sparc 10 which is running potato and started playing with ash. Took the default potato sparc package and verified that the behaviour is the same as the one I see on the boot-floppies. Tested the potato package on a sparc64 potato machine: it works fine there. Interesting ... Compiled my own ash-0.3.5 Debian package on the sparc 10, same random segfaulting behaviour (note that the forked shells segfault _not_ the rootshell itself). Compiled the slink ash-0.3.4 package: this one works fine ;-) Compiled the ash-0.3.5 package with jobs.c reverted to ash-0.3.4, works too. Tried to find the guilty change by invidually reverting the changes to jobs.c to the 0.3.4 version but no luck. There's something fishy going on here ... Let's check the compilers. Compile 0.3.5 on a slink sparc machine and copy it to a potato box: oh wonder, it works. Urgh, so probably a compiler problem slink used gcc 2.7.2.3 on sparc. Another last test to see if it's compiler related: compiled 0.3.5 on potato but disabled optimization for the jobs.c file. This version works too. So what's the moral of the story: a (normal) bug report against gcc 2.95 because it seems to misoptimise jobs.c for sparc (although it works on sparc64), an (important) bug report against ash to get it recompiled for sparc potato (either disable -O2 for jobs.c or use gcc2.7.2.3) which is needed to get proper boot floppies for sparc32 and a clarification to the boot floppies and busybox people which are not responsible for this bug. I'll keep the boot floppies bug open anyway until we got new sparc boot floppies with a fixed ash. Christian -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Architecture: sparc Kernel: Linux koenig 2.2.15 #1 Wed Jun 7 12:30:24 EDT 2000 sparc Versions of packages gcc depends on: ii binutils2.9.5.0.37-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii cpp 1:2.95.2-13 The GNU C preprocessor. ii libc6 2.1.3-10.0.2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an --- Received: (at 68452-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 22:21:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 17:21:36 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14npT5-0005FX-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:21:35 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
Bug#93278: marked as done (gcc-2.95: gcc segfaults on kernel 2.4.3)
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:52:51 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed with gcc-2.95-2.95.4-0.010407 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2001 10:14:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 08 05:14:54 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from eriador.apana.org.au [203.14.152.116] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14mCDc-0006VB-00; Sun, 08 Apr 2001 05:14:53 -0500 Received: from gondolin.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.0.6] ident=mail) by eriador.apana.org.au with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14mCDX-bk-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Apr 2001 20:14:47 +1000 Received: from herbert by gondolin.me.apana.org.au with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14mCDU-0002Ow-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Apr 2001 20:14:44 +1000 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-2.95: gcc segfaults on kernel 2.4.3 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 20:14:44 +1000 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.3-10 Severity: serious $ /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.3/cc1 -quiet -dumpbase reg_ld_str.c -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i386 -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -version -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -o reg_ld_str.o reg_ld_str.i GNU C version 2.95.3 20010315 (Debian release) (i386-linux) compiled by GNU C version 2.95.3 20010315 (Debian release). reg_ld_str.c: In function `FPU_store_single': reg_ld_str.c:635: warning: `templ' might be used uninitialized in this function Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ reg_ld_str.i can be obtained from http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/bugs/reg_ld_str.i.bz2 gcc-3.0 compiles it successfully. The segfault goes away if the file is passed through the preprocessor again. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux gondolin 2.4.2-pentiumiii-smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 13 07:54:37 EST 2001 i686 unknown Versions of the packages gcc-2.95 depends on: ii binutils 2.11.90.0.1-1 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti ii cpp-2.95 2.95.3-6 The GNU C preprocessor. ii gcc2.95.3-5 The GNU C compiler. ii libc6 2.2.2-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone --- Received: (at 93278-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2001 19:58:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 14 14:58:00 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14oWBD-0002qd-00; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 14:57:59 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA12300 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:53:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id VAA21777; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:52:51 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:52:51 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed with gcc-2.95-2.95.4-0.010407 X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fixed with gcc-2.95-2.95.4-0.010407
Bug#93786: marked as done (arm-loop.dpatch)
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:57:29 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#93786: arm-loop.dpatch has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 19:59:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 14:59:45 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pc57-cam4.cable.ntl.com (kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org) [62.253.135.57] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14nnFp-0003Dr-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 14:59:45 -0500 Received: from localhost ([:::127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=pb) by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14nnFm-0008Uq-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 20:59:42 +0100 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 (debian 2.3.1-1) with nmh-1.0.4+dev To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: arm-loop.dpatch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 20:59:42 +0100 From: Philip Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.3-11 This patch fixes a problem compiling binutils on ARM. It's already installed on the 2.95 branch in CVS, but if future packages are going to use the 2.95.3 tarball it would be good to have this included. #! /bin/sh -e # DP: Fix for SUBREG problems src=gcc if [ $# -eq 3 -a $2 = '-d' ]; then pdir=-d $3 src=$3/gcc elif [ $# -ne 1 ]; then echo 2 `basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument exit 1 fi case $1 in -patch) patch $pdir -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 --fuzz 10 $0 cd $src autoconf ;; -unpatch) patch $pdir -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p1 --fuzz 10 $0 cd $src autoconf ;; *) echo 2 `basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument exit 1 esac exit 0 2001-04-03 Bernd Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * loop.c (combine_movables): Restrict combinations of constants with different modes so that we don't introduce SUBREGs into memory addresses. --- src/gcc/loop.c 2001/01/25 14:03:18 1.156.4.20 +++ src/gcc/loop.c 2001/04/03 12:09:42 1.156.4.21 @@ -1481,10 +1481,16 @@ combine_movables (movables, nregs) width as M1. The check for integer is redundant, but safe, since the only case of differing destination modes with equal sources is when both sources are - VOIDmode, i.e., CONST_INT. */ + VOIDmode, i.e., CONST_INT. + + For 2.95, don't do this if the mode of M1 is Pmode. + This prevents us from substituting SUBREGs for REGs + in memory accesses; not all targets are prepared to + handle this properly. */ (GET_MODE (m-set_dest) == GET_MODE (m1-set_dest) || (GET_MODE_CLASS (GET_MODE (m-set_dest)) == MODE_INT GET_MODE_CLASS (GET_MODE (m1-set_dest)) == MODE_INT +GET_MODE (m1-set_dest) != Pmode (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE (m-set_dest)) = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE (m1-set_dest) /* See if the source of M1 says it matches M. */ --- Received: (at 93786-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2001 20:03:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 14 15:03:19 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14oWGM-0003Zc-00; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 15:03:18 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA12580; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:57:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id VAA21814; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:57:29 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:57:29 +0200 (MEST) To: Philip Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#93786: arm-loop.dpatch In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: VM 6.43
Bug#93481: marked as done (pragma pack works on x86; ignored on arm)
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:52:03 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2001 02:37:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 09 21:37:25 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from rdu26-240-185.nc.rr.com (tecumseh2.dyn.dhs.org) [66.26.240.185]
(root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14mo21-Sp-00; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 21:37:25 -0500
Received: from bgdarnel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by tecumseh2.dyn.dhs.org (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA11167;
Mon, 9 Apr 2001 22:43:46 -0400
Received: from bgdarnel by bgdarnel with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14mo1k-u0-00; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:37:08 -0400
From: Ben Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pragma pack works on x86; ignored on arm
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:37:08 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Ben Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc
Version: 1:2.95.3-7
Severity: normal
Pragma pack works as expected on x86, but is ignored on arm (test case at the
end of this mail, verified on rameau.debian.org). I understand that pragmas
are deprecated in favor of __attribute__, but this breaks quite a bit of
existing code (see, for example, bug #91911). I think this should at
least be consistent across all platforms supported by Debian.
Thanks,
-Ben
#pragma pack(2)
struct foo {
short a;
long b;
};
int main() {
/* prints 6 on x86, 8 on arm */
printf(%d\n, sizeof(struct foo));
return 0;
};
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bgdarnel 2.4.1 #10 Fri Feb 23 14:57:57 EST 2001 i686
Versions of packages gcc depends on:
ii cpp 1:2.95.3-7 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii cpp-2.95 1:2.95.3-10 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii gcc-2.95 1:2.95.3-10 The GNU C compiler.
---
Received: (at 93481-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2001 12:52:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 18 07:52:09 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pc57-cam4.cable.ntl.com (kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org)
[62.253.135.57]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14prRJ-0007E7-00; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 07:52:09 -0500
Received: from localhost
([:::127.0.0.1] helo=kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org ident=pb)
by kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 14prRD-0004m6-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:52:03 +0100
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 (debian 2.3.1-1) with nmh-1.0.4+dev
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:52:03 +0100
From: Philip Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This isn't a bug in GCC.
Processed: Bug#94137: gcc -mieee-with-inexact on ev67 gives wrong results
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 94137 gcc Bug#94137: octave gives wrong results on Alpha 21264 Bug reassigned from package `octave' to `gcc'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Bug#94891: %zd printf spec generates warning, even in c9x mode
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 94981 No help available for Vim Bug#94981: [fixed in 3.0] %zd printf spec generates warning, even in c9x mode Changed Bug title. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) retitle 94891 [fixed in 3.0] %zd printf spec generates warning, even in c9x mode Bug#94891: %zd printf spec generates warning, even in c9x mode Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#79882: marked as done (compile failure in BIND 8 on woody)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010425 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2000 06:55:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 18 00:55:37 2000 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from winfree.gag.com [192.133.104.8] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 147uCv-0003BN-00; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 00:55:37 -0600 Received: from rover.gag.com (rover.gag.com [192.133.104.32]) by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9306D25B61 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:55:36 -0700 (MST) Received: by rover.gag.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E915C35F6C; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:55:35 -0700 (MST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: compile failure in BIND 8 on woody Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:55:35 -0700 (MST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bdale Garbee) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc Version: 2.95.2-20 Attempting to build the Debian BIND 8.2.2p7 packages on woody fails with errors in src/lib/irs/irpmarshall.c that go away when I remove the '-O' from the compile. Fragment of failed build log attached below. Bdale Without -O: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/Packages/bind/bind-8.2.2p7/src/lib/irs$ gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -I../../port/linux/include -I../../include -D_REENTRANT -c irpmarshall.c -o threaded/irpmarshall.o irpmarshall.c:93: warning: static declaration for `strndup' follows non-static [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/Packages/bind/bind-8.2.2p7/src/lib/irs$ With: (gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O -g -I../../port/linux/include -I../../include -D_REENTRANT -c irpmarshall.c \ -o threaded/irpmarshall.o ; \ ld -x -r threaded/irpmarshall.o \ mv a.out threaded/irpmarshall.o) irpmarshall.c:93: parse error before `__extension__' irpmarshall.c:93: parse error before `len' irpmarshall.c:93: parse error before `if' irpmarshall.c:93: conflicting types for `__retval' irpmarshall.c:93: previous declaration of `__retval' irpmarshall.c:93: `__len' undeclared here (not in a function) irpmarshall.c:93: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast irpmarshall.c:93: initializer element is not constant irpmarshall.c:93: warning: data definition has no type or storage class irpmarshall.c:93: parse error before `if' irpmarshall.c:93: redefinition of `__retval' irpmarshall.c:93: `__retval' previously defined here irpmarshall.c:93: parse error before `str' irpmarshall.c:93: `__len' undeclared here (not in a function) irpmarshall.c:93: warning: passing arg 1 of `memcpy' makes pointer from integer without a cast irpmarshall.c:93: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast irpmarshall.c:93: initializer element is not constant irpmarshall.c:93: warning: data definition has no type or storage class irpmarshall.c:93: parse error before `}' irpmarshall.c:93: warning: data definition has no type or storage class irpmarshall.c:93: parse error before `}' irpmarshall.c:1880: parse error before `__extension__' irpmarshall.c:1880: redefinition of `__n' irpmarshall.c:93: `__n' previously defined here irpmarshall.c:1880: parse error before `len' irpmarshall.c:1880: conflicting types for `__retval' irpmarshall.c:93: previous declaration of `__retval' irpmarshall.c:1880: parse error before `if' irpmarshall.c:1880: conflicting types for `__retval' irpmarshall.c:1880: previous declaration of `__retval' irpmarshall.c:1880: `__len' undeclared here (not in a function) irpmarshall.c:1880: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast irpmarshall.c:1880: initializer element is not constant irpmarshall.c:1880: warning: data definition has no type or storage class irpmarshall.c:1880: parse error before `if' irpmarshall.c:1880: redefinition of `__retval' irpmarshall.c:1880: `__retval' previously defined here irpmarshall.c:1880: parse error before `str' irpmarshall.c:1880: `__len' undeclared here (not in a function) irpmarshall.c:1880: warning: passing arg 1 of `memcpy' makes pointer from integer without a cast irpmarshall.c:1880: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast irpmarshall.c:1880: initializer element is not constant irpmarshall.c:1880: warning: data definition has no type or storage class irpmarshall.c:1880: parse error before `}' irpmarshall.c:1880: warning: data definition has no type or storage class irpmarshall.c:1880: parse error
Bug#94038: marked as done (Build-depends wrong on hurd-i386)
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010425 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2001 09:02:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 15 04:02:06 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cr499794-a.crdva1.bc.wave.home.com (oasis.zugzug.com) [24.113.91.74] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14oiQ2-0008GK-00; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 04:02:06 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by oasis.zugzug.com (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5/Debian 8.12.0-1) id f3F924fg002271; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 02:02:04 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Build-depends wrong on hurd-i386 X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14 Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 02:02:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-2.95 Severity: important Please change the build-depends line from !i386-hurd to !hurd-i386. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: hurd-i386 --- Received: (at 94038-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2001 20:31:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 15:31:19 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14sVwV-0005OP-00; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:31:19 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA24598; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id WAA06338; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:40 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:39 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010425 X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds1-0.010424) unstable; urgency=high * Apply updated ppc-fsirl patch (function.c removed) for all archs again. urgency=high for powerpc. * Remove patches included in ppc-fsirl patch: ppc-descriptions, ppc-ice. * Correct build dependency (hurd-i386) (#94038). * debian/rules2: Get free memory correctly on hurd (#94127). * close #68452: ash is available on sparc and doesn't have any special build rules for sparc. * close #79882: bind-8.2.3 compiles fine on i386. * Alpha related bug fixed in 2.95.3 (closes #94137). * Fix typo in docs (-fstdc - -stdc). Closes #94894, #94899. * Not a bug: #93481 (see report).
Processed: Re: Bug#95800: upgrade is broken
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 95800 libdb2 Bug#95800: upgrade is broken Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++2.10-dev' to `libdb2'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Bug#95955: glibc doesn't build from source
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 95955 gcc-2.95 Bug#95955: glibc doesn't build from source Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `gcc-2.95'. retitle 95955 gcc-2.95.4: fails to compile glibc, but 2.95.3-11 works Bug#95955: glibc doesn't build from source Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Bug#95978: glibc; Fails to build from source
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 95978 gcc-2.95 Bug#95978: glibc; Fails to build from source Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `gcc-2.95'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: new email address (newer than the bugs, anyway)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 30774
Bug#30774: ppp: pppd kills entire process group on exit
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 30774 !
Bug#30774: ppp: pppd kills entire process group on exit
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 36886
Bug#36886: docbook-stylesheets: lt; in INDEXTERM becomes
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 36886 !
Bug#36886: docbook-stylesheets: lt; in INDEXTERM becomes
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 40097
Bug#40097: gnome-apt gdeb i18n
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 40097 !
Bug#40097: gnome-apt gdeb i18n
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 46709
Bug#46709: Mach lets processes write to I/O ports
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 46709 !
Bug#46709: Mach lets processes write to I/O ports
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 47948
Bug#47948: GNUmach doesn't enqueue 0xE0 scancodes. [patch]
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 47948 !
Bug#47948: GNUmach doesn't enqueue 0xE0 scancodes. [patch]
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 49309
Bug#49309: screen: stty size in a new screen ignores windows and captions
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 49309 !
Bug#49309: screen: stty size in a new screen ignores windows and captions
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 51346
Bug#51346: emacs20 (source): old debian/{control,copyright,menu}
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 51346 !
Bug#51346: emacs20 (source): old debian/{control,copyright,menu}
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 51348
Bug#51348: emacs20 (source): [patch] install-strip runs wrong target in
recursive make
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 51348 !
Bug#51348: emacs20 (source): [patch] install-strip runs wrong target in
recursive make
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 52817
Bug#52817: aview: won't compile with gcc_2.95.2-0pre2
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 52817 !
Bug#52817: aview: won't compile with gcc_2.95.2-0pre2
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 57174
Bug#57174: gnuplot (source): unary operator expected [patch]
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 57174 !
Bug#57174: gnuplot (source): unary operator expected [patch]
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 34818
Bug#34818: emacs20: auto-insert return value
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 34818 !
Bug#34818: emacs20: auto-insert return value
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 36890
Bug#36890: authbind: LD_PRELOAD in setuid programs
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 36890 !
Bug#36890: authbind: LD_PRELOAD in setuid programs
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 38561
Bug#38561: findutils: Make filenames in locatedb relative to it
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 38561 !
Bug#38561: findutils: Make filenames in locatedb relative to it
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 43538
Bug#43538: autoconf: Warn against AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(aux)
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 43538 !
Bug#43538: autoconf: Warn against AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(aux)
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 53066
Bug#53066: chrony: acquisitionport directive and doc fixes [patch]
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 53066 !
Bug#53066: chrony: acquisitionport directive and doc fixes [patch]
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 55220
Bug#55220: e2fsck -C3 corrupts file system
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
reopen 55220 !
Bug#55220: e2fsck -C3 corrupts file system
Bug reopened, originator set to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED].
close 59333
Bug#59333: -t shouldn't round to
Bug#97796: marked as done (gpc 'include file bug')
Your message dated Thu, 24 May 2001 19:30:41 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#97796: gpc 'include file bug' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2001 13:06:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 17 08:06:15 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cassis-gw.univ-brest.fr [195.83.247.29] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 150NTq-00034z-00; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:06:14 -0500 Received: from univ-brest.fr (euphrosine.univ-brest.fr [194.167.225.104]) by cassis-gw.univ-brest.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id PAA03771 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 17 May 2001 15:06:08 +0200 (MET DST) Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 13:07:29 + From: Fred JEAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Universite de Bretagne Occidentale / IUEM X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gpc 'include file bug' Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by cassis-gw.univ-brest.fr id PAA03771 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gpc-2.95 Version: 19991030, based on 2.95.2 2220 Hi, It seems that instruction '#include anyfile' only works on first invocati= on. Here is the simplest thing I did which fails : cd /tmp mkdir inc touch inc/h1.def touch inc/h2.def cat htest.p program ht(input,output); #include h1.def #include h2.def begin writeln(hello); end. CTRL-D When I compile with: gpc -I/tmp/inc -o htest htest.p or with : gpc -I/tmp/inc -lchill -o htest htest.p**see #47453 it returns : htest.p:4: h2.def: No such file or directory -- System information Potato Linux version 2.2.14 gcc version 2.95.2 19991103 Architecture: i386 ii libc6 2.1.3-13 ii gpc 2.95.2-13 ii gcc 2.95.2-13 Can you help ? - Thanks -- C'est curieux chez les marins, ce besoin de faire des phrases (M.A.) -= - Dr Fred JEAN - UMR CNRS 6539 / LEMAR / Univ. Bretagne Occidentale Institut Universitaire Europ=E9en de la Mer. F-29280 PLOUZANE Pho:+33 (0)2 98 49 86 38 // Fax:+33 (0)2 98 49 86 45 http://www.univ-brest.fr/IUEM/UMR6539/ --- Received: (at 97796-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2001 17:35:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 24 12:35:07 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 152z0t-0004SM-00; Thu, 24 May 2001 12:35:07 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA15145; Thu, 24 May 2001 19:30:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id TAA21680; Thu, 24 May 2001 19:30:41 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 19:30:41 +0200 (MEST) To: Fred JEAN [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#97796: gpc 'include file bug' In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fred JEAN writes: Package: gpc-2.95 Version: 19991030, based on 2.95.2 2220 Hi, It seems that instruction '#include anyfile' only works on first invocation. Here is the simplest thing I did which fails : cd /tmp mkdir inc touch inc/h1.def touch inc/h2.def cat htest.p program ht(input,output); #include h1.def #include h2.def begin writeln(hello); end. CTRL-D When I compile with: gpc -I/tmp/inc -o htest htest.p or with : gpc -I/tmp/inc -lchill -o htest htest.p**see #47453 it returns : htest.p:4: h2.def: No such file or directory -- System information Potato Linux version 2.2.14 gcc version 2.95.2 19991103 Architecture: i386 ii libc6 2.1.3-13 ii gpc 2.95.2-13 ii gcc 2.95.2-13 Can you help ? - Thanks Fixed in the current gpc-2.95.[34] versions in the testing and unstable distributions.
Processed: Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 97030 normal Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code Severity set to `normal'. retitle 97030 [fixed in gcc-3.0] wrong code generation Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#95318: marked as forwarded (gcc-3.0: unnecessary cwtl)
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2001 20:35:31 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #95318, regarding gcc-3.0: unnecessary cwtl to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#97904: marked as forwarded (gcc-3.0: Pointless moving)
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2001 20:39:53 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #97904, regarding gcc-3.0: Pointless moving to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: forwarded gcc bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 43170 [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class Bug#43170: Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class Changed Bug title. forwarded 43170 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class Forwarded-to-address changed from gcc@gcc.gnu.org to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: please recheck with recent compiler versions
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 63546 amaya Bug#63546: mistranslation of amaya on ix86 Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `amaya'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#96348: marked as done (libgcj2-dev must depend on libgcj2)
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2001 19:08:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 04 14:08:01 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailhub.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14vkvp-0002TD-00; Fri, 04 May 2001 14:08:01 -0500 Received: (qmail 31953 invoked from network); 4 May 2001 19:07:59 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 4 May 2001 19:07:59 - Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14vkvk-0008LC-00; Fri, 04 May 2001 21:07:56 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgcj2-dev must depend on libgcj2 X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.15 Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 21:07:53 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libgcj2-dev Version: 1:3.0-0pre010427 Severity: grave libgcj2-dev must depend on libgcj2. Without libgcj2 installed e.g. all /usr/lib/lib*.so links are dangling symlinks. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de 2.4.4 #1 Sat Apr 28 12:12:20 CEST 2001 i586 Versions of packages libgcj2-dev depends on: ii gcj-3.0 1:3.0-0pre010427 The GNU compiler for Java(TM). ii libc6 2.2.2-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libc6-dev 2.2.2-4 GNU C Library: Development Librari ii zlib1g 1:1.1.3-15 compression library - runtime ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.1.3-15 compression library - development --- Received: (at 96348-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 22:10:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 27 17:10:17 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1548jm-0005Ir-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:10:14 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03363; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id AAA01795; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) unstable; urgency=high * Urgency high for replacing the gcc-3.0 snapshots in testing, which now are incompatile due to the changed ABIs. * Upstream begins tagging with gcc-3_0_pre_2001mmdd. * Tighten dependencies to install only binary packages derived from one source (#98851). Tighten libc6-dev dependency to match libc6. gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010525) unstable; urgency=low * ATTENTION: The ABI (exception handling) changed. No upgrade path from earlier snapshots (you had been warned in the postinst ...) Closing #93597, #94576, #96448, #96461. You have to rebuild * HELP is appreciated for scanning the Debian BTS and sending followups to bug reports!!! * Should we name debian gcc uploads? What about a still seeking g++ maintainer upload? * Fixed in gcc-3.0: #97030 * Update patches for recent (010525) CVS sources. * Make check depend on build target (fakeroot problmes). * debian/rules.d/binary-libgcc.mk: new file, build first. * Free memory detection on the hurd for running the testsuite. * Update debhelper build dependency. * libstdc++-doc: Include doxygen
Bug#96273: marked as done (Typo in Suggests)
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:10:27 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-defaults-0.8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2001 04:44:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 03 23:44:14 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (debian-home) [12.44.141.183] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14vXRu-FV-00; Thu, 03 May 2001 23:44:14 -0500 Received: from gbsadler by debian-home with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14vXV6-0002NM-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 03 May 2001 23:47:32 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 23:47:32 -0500 From: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Typo in Suggests Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15 Sender: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: g++ Version: 1:2.95.3-7 Severity: minor Suggests: task-c++-devel s/devel/dev/ -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux debian-home 2.2.19 #2 Tue May 1 00:41:28 CDT 2001 i686 Versions of packages g++ depends on: ii cpp1:2.95.3-7The GNU C preprocessor. ii g++-2.95 1:2.95.4-0.010424 The GNU C++ compiler. ii gcc-2.95 1:2.95.4-0.010424 The GNU C compiler. --- Received: (at 96273-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 22:14:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 27 17:14:45 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1548o8-0005PI-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:14:44 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03544; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:10:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id AAA01813; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:10:28 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:10:27 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-defaults-0.8 X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-defaults (0.8) unstable; urgency=low * Update version number to 2.95.4 (except m68k). * debian/control.m4: correct CHILL description (closes: #93929). * Default to 3.0 for ia64-linux, mips-linux and mipsel-linux * gcj defaults to 3.0 for all architectures. * Fix suggestions of task packages (closes: #96272, #96273).
Bug#96461: marked as done (File conflicts with libgcj300)
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2001 22:07:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 05 17:07:28 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from bittersweet.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.27.231] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14wAD1-0003Wy-00; Sat, 05 May 2001 17:07:28 -0500
Received: from karl ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) with
ESMTP id f45M7QoD017180
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 May 2001 15:07:26 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by karl (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) id
f45M7Q4B017175;
Sat, 5 May 2001 15:07:26 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: karl: karlheg set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: File conflicts with libgcj300
X-Face: /Q}=yl}1_v7nP)[EMAIL
PROTECTED])f]zN?+hB!K.m9:[|*p34jVN`O;:XZXVSy/\RqDt(t8w!-i{(y0`jFw^uk8inzO9wXabd'CdjUWfC\GHi:6nO*YC89#-qDQ4r%9!VRYJ=7D#$;q=zML5'!=wvXk^$`6FT=5CMofQX)WUKt0p:OKl.mFOXx/D
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom)
Date: 05 May 2001 15:07:26 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lines: 5
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libgcj2
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010427
Severity: normal
There are file conflicts with libgcj300
---
Received: (at 96461-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 22:10:17 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 27 17:10:16 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1548jm-0005Ir-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:10:14 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03363;
Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id AAA01795;
Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) unstable; urgency=high
* Urgency high for replacing the gcc-3.0 snapshots in testing, which
now are incompatile due to the changed ABIs.
* Upstream begins tagging with gcc-3_0_pre_2001mmdd.
* Tighten dependencies to install only binary packages derived from
one source (#98851). Tighten libc6-dev dependency to match libc6.
gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010525) unstable; urgency=low
* ATTENTION: The ABI (exception handling) changed. No upgrade path from
earlier snapshots (you had been warned in the postinst ...)
Closing #93597, #94576, #96448, #96461.
You have to rebuild
* HELP is appreciated for scanning the Debian BTS and sending followups
to bug reports!!!
* Should we name debian gcc uploads? What about a still seeking
g++ maintainer upload?
* Fixed in gcc-3.0: #97030
* Update patches for recent (010525) CVS sources.
* Make check depend on build target (fakeroot problmes).
* debian/rules.d/binary-libgcc.mk: new file, build first.
* Free memory detection on the hurd for running the testsuite.
* Update debhelper build dependency.
* libstdc++-doc: Include doxygen generated docs.
* Fix boring packaging bugs, too tired for appropriate changelogs ...
#93343, #96348, #96262, #97134, #97905, #96451, #95812, #93157
* Fixed bugs: #87000.
Bug#97030: marked as done ([fixed in gcc-3.0] wrong code generation)
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2001 21:01:19 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 10 16:01:19 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mta05-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14xxYl-0006QV-00; Thu, 10 May 2001 16:01:19 -0500
Received: from dueto.rano1.org ([62.253.149.167]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP
id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 May 2001 22:01:03 +0100
Received: from ege by dueto.rano1.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14xxIe-0001WZ-00; Thu, 10 May 2001 21:44:40 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 21:44:40 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc
Version: 1:2.95.3-7
Severity: important
Maybe I've been working too hard, but this gcc seems to get this wrong
with -O2:
void gunc(unsigned a, unsigned b)
{
}
unsigned func(unsigned a, unsigned b)
{
long long x = 0;
gunc(a, b);
return (x + 1) * a * b;
}
int main()
{
unsigned a, b;
a = 1;
b = 1;
return func(a, b);
}
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux dueto.rano1.org 2.2.19 #4 SMP Mon Apr 16 12:55:15 BST
2001 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages gcc depends on:
ii cpp2.95.3-7 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii cpp-2.95 2.95.4-0.01042 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii gcc-2.95 2.95.4-0.01042 The GNU C compiler.
---
Received: (at 97030-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 22:10:18 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 27 17:10:18 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1548jm-0005Ir-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:10:14 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03363;
Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id AAA01795;
Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) unstable; urgency=high
* Urgency high for replacing the gcc-3.0 snapshots in testing, which
now are incompatile due to the changed ABIs.
* Upstream begins tagging with gcc-3_0_pre_2001mmdd.
* Tighten dependencies to install only binary packages derived from
one source (#98851). Tighten libc6-dev dependency to match libc6.
gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010525) unstable; urgency=low
* ATTENTION: The ABI (exception handling) changed. No upgrade path from
earlier snapshots (you had been warned in the postinst ...)
Closing #93597, #94576, #96448, #96461.
You have to rebuild
* HELP is appreciated for scanning the Debian BTS and sending followups
to bug reports!!!
* Should we name debian gcc uploads? What about a still seeking
g++ maintainer upload?
* Fixed in gcc-3.0: #97030
* Update patches for recent (010525) CVS sources.
* Make check depend on build target (fakeroot problmes).
* debian/rules.d/binary-libgcc.mk: new file, build first.
* Free memory detection on the hurd for running the testsuite.
* Update debhelper build dependency.
* libstdc++-doc: Include doxygen generated docs.
* Fix boring packaging bugs, too tired for appropriate changelogs ...
#93343, #96348, #96262, #97134, #97905, #96451,
Bug#97905: marked as done (libstdc++3-dev; Bad /usr/lib/libstdc++.la)
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2001 08:53:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 03:53:24 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-63-193-247-253.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.247.253] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 150g0i-0005fc-00; Fri, 18 May 2001 03:53:24 -0500 Received: from daniel by adsl-63-193-247-253.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 150g0X-0006sA-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 May 2001 01:53:13 -0700 To: Debian GNU/Linux bug list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libstdc++3-dev; Bad /usr/lib/libstdc++.la Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 18 May 2001 01:53:13 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lines: 20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libstdc++3-dev Version: 1:3.0-0pre010427 Severity: normal The /usr/lib/libstdc++.la file contains the line libdir='/usr/lib' which confuses libtool into trying to link in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so, which g++ then can't find. This is preventing me from building any KDE applications, even with g++-2.95, unless I remove the g++-3.0 packages. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux frobnitz 2.4.4 #1 Thu May 3 12:52:36 PDT 2001 i686 unknown Versions of the packages libstdc++3-dev depends on: ii g++-3.03.0-0pre010427 The GNU C++ compiler. ii gcc-3.0-base 3.0-0pre010427 The GNU compiler collection (base package). ii libc6-dev 2.2.3-1GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea ii libstdc++3 3.0-0pre010427 The GNU stdc++ library version 3 --- Received: (at 97905-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 22:10:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 27 17:10:17 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1548jm-0005Ir-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:10:14 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03363; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id AAA01795; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) unstable; urgency=high * Urgency high for replacing the gcc-3.0 snapshots in testing, which now are incompatile due to the changed ABIs. * Upstream begins tagging with gcc-3_0_pre_2001mmdd. * Tighten dependencies to install only binary packages derived from one source (#98851). Tighten libc6-dev dependency to match libc6. gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010525) unstable; urgency=low * ATTENTION: The ABI (exception handling) changed. No upgrade path from earlier snapshots (you had been warned in the postinst ...) Closing #93597, #94576, #96448, #96461. You have to rebuild * HELP is appreciated for scanning the Debian BTS and sending followups to bug reports!!! * Should we name debian gcc uploads? What about a still seeking g++ maintainer upload? * Fixed in gcc-3.0: #97030 * Update patches for recent (010525) CVS sources. * Make check depend on build target (fakeroot problmes). * debian/rules.d/binary-libgcc.mk: new file, build first. * Free memory detection on the hurd for running the testsuite. * Update debhelper build dependency. * libstdc++-doc: Include doxygen generated docs. * Fix boring packaging bugs,
Bug#97769: marked as done (gcc-2.95: missing build dependency)
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:12:06 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds2-0.010522) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2001 07:22:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 17 02:22:34 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h24-78-251-235.vc.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.78.251.235] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 150I7F-0005Xi-00; Thu, 17 May 2001 02:22:33 -0500 Received: from cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.0.2]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id AAA31886; Thu, 17 May 2001 00:22:31 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Authentication-Warning: straylight.cyberhqz.com: Host [EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.0.2] claimed to be cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com Received: by cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 17 May 2001 00:22:31 -0700 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 00:22:31 -0700 From: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-2.95: missing build dependency To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.4-0.010506 Severity: serious make check needs libncurses5-dev installed: make[7]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds1/build-native/mips-linux/libg++/etc/lf' ... /build/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds1/src-native/libg++/etc/lf/screen.cc:5:termcap.h: No such file or directory make[7]: *** [screen.o] Error 1 ... make[7]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. on a seperate note, after this, expect fails: make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds1/build-native/gcc' ... runtest --tool gcc expect: error while loading shared libraries: cannot open shared object file: cannot load shared object file: No such file or directory i'm not sure what might be causing this without knowing what shared libraries it is trying to use... --- Received: (at 97769-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 22:14:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 27 17:14:33 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1548nw-0005PI-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:14:32 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03649 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:12:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id AAA01833; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:12:07 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:12:06 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds2-0.010522) X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds2-0.010522) unstable; urgency=low * Updated to CVS 20010522 (gcc-2_95-branch). * Updated gpc (20010516). * Don't install drivers for pascal variants. * Add libncurses5-dev to build dependencies (needed for libg++ check). Closes #97769.
Bug#98851: marked as done (Should have versioned depend on libgcc0?)
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 03:32:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 26 22:32:56 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (debian-home) [12.44.141.183] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 153rIW-FB-00; Sat, 26 May 2001 22:32:56 -0500 Received: from gbsadler by debian-home with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 153rIQ-0002S7-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 May 2001 22:32:50 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 22:32:42 -0500 From: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Should have versioned depend on libgcc0? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.16 Sender: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-0pre010525 Severity: normal libstdc++3 has a versioned depend for libgcc0 I would suggest gcc-3.0 should as well. Currently it is unversioned. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux debian-home 2.2.19 #1 Sat May 19 16:25:04 CDT 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages gcc-3.0 depends on: ii binutils2.11.90.0.7-2The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii cpp-3.0 1:3.0-0pre010427 The GNU C preprocessor. ii gcc-3.0-base1:3.0-0pre010525 The GNU compiler collection (base ii libc6 2.2.3-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc0 1:3.0-0pre010525 GCC support library. -- Gordon Sadler --- Received: (at 98851-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 22:10:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 27 17:10:16 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1548jm-0005Ir-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:10:14 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03363; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id AAA01795; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) unstable; urgency=high * Urgency high for replacing the gcc-3.0 snapshots in testing, which now are incompatile due to the changed ABIs. * Upstream begins tagging with gcc-3_0_pre_2001mmdd. * Tighten dependencies to install only binary packages derived from one source (#98851). Tighten libc6-dev dependency to match libc6. gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010525) unstable; urgency=low * ATTENTION: The ABI (exception handling) changed. No upgrade path from earlier snapshots (you had been warned in the postinst ...) Closing #93597, #94576, #96448, #96461. You have to rebuild * HELP is appreciated for scanning the Debian BTS and sending followups to bug reports!!! * Should we name debian gcc uploads? What about a still seeking g++ maintainer upload? * Fixed in gcc-3.0: #97030 * Update patches for recent (010525) CVS sources. * Make check depend on build target (fakeroot problmes). * debian/rules.d/binary-libgcc.mk: new file, build first. * Free memory detection on the hurd for running the testsuite. * Update debhelper build dependency. * libstdc++-doc: Include doxygen generated docs. * Fix boring packaging bugs, too
Bug#94791: marked as done (pine fails to compile)
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 18:36:23 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#94791: pine fails to compile has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2001 02:56:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 21 21:56:08 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from chmls06.mediaone.net [24.147.1.144] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14rA2h-0006VO-00; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 21:56:08 -0500 Received: from h000103c16cb1.ne.mediaone.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.31.94.234]) by chmls06.mediaone.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3M2u1801181 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 22:56:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from praetorian.dyn.dhs.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) with ESMTP id f3M2u8PN018592 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 22:56:08 -0400 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by praetorian.dyn.dhs.org (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) id f3M2u7J4018590 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 22:56:07 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 22:56:07 -0400 From: James Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pine fails to compile Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.4-0.010407 When I compile pine-4.33, it spews out errors. Potato does not have this problem, however since leaving gcc-2.95.2, I have not been able to succesfully compile pine (I am well aware that pine is not a package in the debian package trees). I have been able to compile pine on all other distros using varying gcc's and other unices that don't use gcc. I'm not absolutely positive that this is a gcc on debian problem, it could be a problem with headers from a different package or something else. The errors are in the log attached. Note that it fails completeion of compilation in more than one area, but do to the way pine is setup to compile the error, while fatal is skipped and the next dir compilation is started. The compilation line used for this was ./build slx James Moss --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE64khHELzfQYyO+wsRAp8tAJ4qR7ErOg1Au+n6DxTAeoBbqhMHvACgx7Y5 rbXT700/RHQKRJBlnU2SE6A= =c3p9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62-- --- Received: (at 94791-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2001 16:38:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 29 11:38:19 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 154mVe-0007Ks-00; Tue, 29 May 2001 11:38:19 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA29661; Tue, 29 May 2001 18:36:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id SAA27705; Tue, 29 May 2001 18:36:23 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 18:36:23 +0200 (MEST) To: James Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#94791: pine fails to compile In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 Emerald XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] these are no gcc bugs, but probably bugs in pine's configuration system. in file included from osdep.c:42: env_unix.c: In function `do_date': env_unix.c:296: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast env_unix.c:297: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type struct tm is never defined In file included from osdep.c:46: tz_sv4.c: In function `rfc822_timezone': tz_sv4.c:30: `tzname' undeclared (first use in this function) tz_sv4.c:30: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
Bug#100110: marked as done (interactive postinst on gcc-3.0-base)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:36:29 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed with gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds7-0pre010609) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2001 12:28:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 08 07:28:37 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pc2-hems4-0-cust95.bre.cable.ntl.com (rhirst.linuxcare.com) [:::213.107.176.95] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 158LNV-00022s-00; Fri, 08 Jun 2001 07:28:37 -0500 Received: by rhirst.linuxcare.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4E038B007; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:24:41 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:24:41 +0100 From: Richard Hirst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: interactive postinst on gcc-3.0-base Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0us Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0-base Version: 3.0-0pre010526 postinst does a 'read', which causes problems for the installer when it feeds debootstrap stdin from /dev/null. Fix is apparently to not prompt if DEBIAN_FRONTEND=Noninteractive. Richard On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 03:03:30PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote: I have a problem with this; my gcc-3.0-base.deb has a postinst with a read foo in it, and a first line of #!/bin/sh -e. That -e causes the script to exit with code 1 when the read fails (which it does, when directed from /dev/null). That causes the postinst to fail, and debootstrap never manages to get all packages configured. Check for DEBIAN_FRONTEND=Noninteractive, and don't prompt if it's set like that. Cheers, aj --- Received: (at 100110-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2001 21:39:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 10 16:39:33 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 159Cvk-0005gu-00; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 16:39:32 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA00310; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:36:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5ALaTr17329; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:36:29 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:36:29 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed with gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds7-0pre010609) X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds7-0pre010609) unstable; urgency=low * Fix build dependency for the hurd (#99164). * Update patches for recent (010609) CVS sources. * Disable java on powerpc (link error in libjava). * gcc-3.0-base.postinst: Don't prompt for non-interactive installs (#100110). as well the doublette #100358.
Processed: both are the same bug...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 100447 grave Bug#100447: gcc-3.0-doc: Installation fails Severity set to `grave'. merge 100447 100459 Bug#100447: gcc-3.0-doc: Installation fails Bug#100459: Installation of gcc-3.0-doc fails Merged 100447 100459. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#100447: marked as done (gcc-3.0-doc: Installation fails)
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2001 20:54:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 10 15:54:04 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vitelus.com [:::64.81.36.147] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 159CDj-0003br-00; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 15:54:04 -0500 Received: from endquote ([192.168.2.2]) by vitelus.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 159CDc-0007ZK-00; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:53:56 -0700 Received: by endquote (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:53:56 -0700 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 13:53:56 -0700 From: Aaron Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-3.0-doc: Installation fails To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0-doc Version: 1:3.0-0pre010609 Severity: serious Setting up gcc-3.0-doc (3.0-0pre010609) ... sh: /usr/share/info/c-tree-300.info.gz: No such file or directory install-info: read gzip -d /usr/share/info/c-tree-300.info.gz |: 256 dpkg: error processing gcc-3.0-doc (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux endquote 2.4.5-ac11 #2 Fri Jun 8 20:57:07 PDT 2001 i686 unknown Versions of the packages gcc-3.0-doc depends on: ii gcc-3.0-base 3.0-0pre010609 The GNU compiler collection (base package). --- Received: (at 100447-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2001 07:03:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 02:03:00 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15AndD-0006pJ-00; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:02:59 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA23073; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5F6vtv01211; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) unstable; urgency=low * Update patches for recent (010613 23:13 +0200) CVS sources. * Fix packaging bugs (#100459, #100447, #100483). * Build-Depend on gawk, mawk doesn't work well with test_summary.
Bug#100863: marked as done (Instalation problem: c-tree-300.info.gz don't exist)
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2001 15:44:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 14 10:44:15 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pb220.legnica.sdi.tpnet.pl (tavaiah) [:::213.25.230.220] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15AZI4-0002h1-00; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:44:15 -0500 Received: from taw by tavaiah with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15AZ9I-0001GS-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:35:08 +0200 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:35:06 +0200 From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Instalation problem: c-tree-300.info.gz don't exist Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Sender: Debian User [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0-doc Version: 3.0-0pre010609 Severity: important Setting up gcc-3.0-doc (3.0-0pre010609) ... sh: /usr/share/info/c-tree-300.info.gz: No such file or directory install-info: read gzip -d /usr/share/info/c-tree-300.info.gz |: 256 dpkg: error processing gcc-3.0-doc (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gcc-3.0-doc --- Received: (at 100447-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2001 07:03:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 02:03:00 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15AndD-0006pJ-00; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:02:59 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA23073; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5F6vtv01211; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) unstable; urgency=low * Update patches for recent (010613 23:13 +0200) CVS sources. * Fix packaging bugs (#100459, #100447, #100483). * Build-Depend on gawk, mawk doesn't work well with test_summary.
Bug#101346: marked as done (refuses to compile a simple source)
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2001 17:45:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 18 12:45:12 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from morsig.xs4all.nl (fog.mors.wiggy.net) [:::213.84.43.14]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15C35L-0002AO-00; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:45:11 -0500
Received: from fog.mors.wiggy.net (IDENT:b0/h0pG9U99x52S/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[127.0.0.1])
by localhost (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) with
ESMTP id f5IHcx7q025415;
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:39:00 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by fog.mors.wiggy.net (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian
8.12.0.Beta10) id f5IHcvEK025412;
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:38:57 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: refuses to compile a simple source
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:38:57 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: g++-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010613
Severity: important
Tags: sid
This is midly annoying:
g++-3.0 -o xxx xxx.C
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
collect2: ld returned 1 exist status
This is the xxx.C source:
--
#ifdef SYS_POLL_MISSING /* { */
struct pollfd { int fd; short events; short revents; };
extern C int poll(struct pollfd *ufds, unsigned int nfds, int timeout);
#define POLLIN 0x0001
#define POLLPRI 0x0002
#define POLLOUT 0x0004
#define POLLERR 0x0008
#define POLLHUP 0x0010
#define POLLNVAL0x0020
#else /* } { */
#include sys/poll.h
#endif /* } */
int main() {
struct pollfd fds[3];
return poll(fds, 3, 700);
}
--
Wichert.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux fog 2.2.19+ext3+ipsec #1 Thu Apr 12 17:22:37 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-1
Versions of packages g++-3.0 depends on:
ii gcc-3.0 1:3.0-0pre010613 The GNU C compiler.
ii gcc-3.0-base1:3.0-0pre010613 The GNU compiler collection (base
ii libc6 2.2.3-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++3-dev 1:3.0-0pre010613 The GNU stdc++ library version 3 (
---
Received: (at 101346-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2001 21:49:10 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 19 16:49:10 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15CTN0-0002gE-00; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:49:10 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA14514;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:34 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5JLhXN00334;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0-1
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fixed in gcc-3.0-1
Bug#101328: marked as done (gcj no longer compiles...)
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2001 13:45:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 18 08:45:29 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-203-45-32-248.vic.bigpond.net.au (MrSilly.MrMen) [:::203.45.32.248] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15BzLD-0007ns-00; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:45:20 -0500 Received: from MrSilly.MrMen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id f5IDkSfd001771; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:46:28 +1000 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by MrSilly.MrMen (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) id f5IDkOSP001769; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:46:24 +1000 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: crazney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcj no longer compiles... X-Reportbug-Version: 1.17 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.17 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:46:24 +1000 X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcj Version: 1:3.0-3 Severity: normal since an update (when gcc 3 came into play) i cant compile (or run) java things.. a simple hello world gives me this on compile: $ gcj -o HelloWorld --main=HelloWorld HelloWorld.java /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s collect2: ld returned 1 exit status -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux MrSilly 2.4.5 #2 Sun Jun 3 21:47:21 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages gcj depends on: ii cpp 1:2.95.4-1 The GNU C preprocessor. ii g++-3.0 1:3.0-0pre010613 The GNU C++ compiler. ii gcj-3.0 1:3.0-0pre010613 The GNU compiler for Java(TM). --- Received: (at 101328-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2001 21:49:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 19 16:49:10 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15CTN0-0002gE-00; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:49:10 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA14514; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5JLhXN00334; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0-1 X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fixed in gcc-3.0-1
Bug#101069: marked as done (ld cannot find -lgcc_s)
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2001 04:35:18 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 23:35:18 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from priss.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us
[:::216.103.68.5]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15B7nl-0005cb-00; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:35:18 -0500
Received: from evan by priss.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us with
local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15B7nA-BB-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 21:34:36 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ld cannot find -lgcc_s
From: Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Evan Prodromou
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1366 538C 1E7D 0093 C45B 1A50 A33C 1E7C 700A 0551
Date: 15 Jun 2001 21:34:36 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lines: 55
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.103
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcj-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010613
Taking a simple Java program as follows:
---8---
public class Hello {
public static void main(String[] argv) {
System.out.println(Hello, World!);
}
}
---8---
And trying to compile it with gcj-3.0 gives the following error:
---8---
evan priss:~/tmp$ gcj-3.0 --main=Hello -o Hello Hello.java
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
---8---
I thought there might be something wrong with the entire compilation
system, so I tried to compile a short C file:
---8---
#include stdio.h
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
printf(Hello, World!\n);
return 0;
}
---8---
...which worked fine:
---8---
evan priss:~/tmp$ gcc-3.0 -o hello hello.c
evan priss:~/tmp$ ./hello
Hello, World!
---8---
By the way, there -is- a libgcc_s available:
---8---
evan priss:~/tmp$ find /usr/lib -name *libgcc_s*
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so
---8---
Suggestions and/or a fix would be lovely. B-)
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Received: (at 101069-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2001 21:49:10 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 19 16:49:10 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15CTN0-0002gE-00; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:49:10 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA14514;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:34 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5JLhXN00334;
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0-1
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fixed in gcc-3.0-1
Processed: retitle gcc reports (2nd try)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 62309 + fixed Bug#62309: [fixed in 3.0] Internal compiler error: program cc1obj got fatal signal 11 Tags added: fixed tags 83221 + fixed Bug#83221: [fixed in 3.0] g++ dies with internal error Tags added: fixed tags 87540 + fixed Bug#87540: [fixed in 3.0] ICE when using -mno-ieee-fp and -march=i686 Tags added: fixed tags 93708 + fixed Bug#93708: [fixed in gcc-3.0] man versus info inconsistency (-W and -Wall) Tags added: fixed tags 96539 + fixed Bug#96539: [fixed in 3.0] libstdc++2.10-dev: Error in bastring.h Tags added: fixed tags 94891 + fixed Bug#94891: [fixed in 3.0] %zd printf spec generates warning, even in c9x mode Tags added: fixed tags 26436 + fixed Bug#26436: [done with gcc-2.96] please recompile with -fhonor-std Tags added: fixed tags 51651 + fixed Bug#51651: [done with gcc-2.96] please use --enable-nls --enable-c-mbchar Tags added: fixed tags 20695 + fixed Bug#20695: regparm/profiling breakage (fixed with gcc-3.0) Tags added: fixed tags 33786 + fixed Bug#33786: [fixed upstream 001117] uncaught floating point exception causes gcc internal compiler error Tags added: fixed tags 34876 + fixed Bug#34876: [fixed upstream 001117] vtable thunks implementation is broken Bug#35477: [fixed upstream 001117] C++ class mishandling Tags added: fixed tags 35477 + fixed Bug#35477: [fixed upstream 001117] C++ class mishandling Bug#34876: [fixed upstream 001117] vtable thunks implementation is broken Tags added: fixed tags 42662 + fixed Bug#42662: [fixed in 2.96 CVS 2720] templated friend Tags added: fixed tags 42989 + fixed Bug#42989: [fixed gcc-2.95.1: g++ 'internal compiler error' messages Tags added: fixed tags 47981 + fixed Bug#47981: [fixed in upstream 2518] [alpha] Mutt segv on viewing list of attachments Tags added: fixed tags 48530 + fixed Bug#48530: g++ [fixed in 2.96 CVS Feb 2000] [alpha]: internal compiler error building open-amulet Tags added: fixed tags 51456 + fixed Bug#51456: [fixed in upstream gcc-2114] another gcc optimization error Tags added: fixed tags 52382 + fixed Bug#52382: [fixed with libstdc++-v3] setw is ignored for strings output Bug#76645: [fixed with libstdc++-v3] setw ios::width fails with libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 Tags added: fixed tags 53698 + fixed Bug#53698: [fixed upstream 001117] internal compiler error with templates Tags added: fixed tags 55291 + fixed Bug#55291: [alpha; fixed in upstream CVS] internal compiler compiling hatman Tags added: fixed tags 55967 + fixed Bug#55967: [fixed in 2.96 CVS 2720] internal compiler error (testcase attached) Tags added: fixed tags 56867 + fixed Bug#56867: [fix with libstdc++-v3 2720] program compiled -O3 -malign-double segfaults in ofstream::~ofstream Tags added: fixed tags 58219 + fixed Bug#58219: [fixed in upstream gcc-2116] Compiler barfs with -O on specific file Tags added: fixed tags 59232 + fixed Bug#59232: [fixed upstream 20010109] gcc -c -MD x/y.c -o x/y.o leaves y.d in the current directory Tags added: fixed tags 59776 + fixed Bug#59776: [implemented upstream 001117] vector doesn't have the at() method Tags added: fixed tags 64628 + fixed Bug#64628: [fixed in 2.96 CVS 2720] gcc -fpack-struct Tags added: fixed tags 65687 + fixed Bug#65687: [fixed upstream 001117] Internal compiler error Tags added: fixed tags 67631 + fixed Bug#67631: [fixed in upstream CVS 2720] Compiler error with -O2 Tags added: fixed tags 69530 + fixed Bug#69530: [fixed upstream 001117] Error in stl_deque.h Tags added: fixed tags 72933 + fixed Bug#72933: [fixed upstream 001117] Hash bug in gcc 2.95.2 Tags added: fixed tags 75759 + fixed Bug#75759: [fixed with libstdc++-v3] problem with bastring Tags added: fixed tags 76645 + fixed Bug#76645: [fixed with libstdc++-v3] setw ios::width fails with libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 Bug#52382: [fixed with libstdc++-v3] setw is ignored for strings output Tags added: fixed tags 78826 + fixed Bug#78826: [fixed upstream 20001205] Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 Tags added: fixed tags 83363 + fixed Bug#83363: [fixed in g++-3.0] g++ breaks a simple sort program when compiling at -O2 Tags added: fixed tags 90666 + fixed Bug#90666: [fixed in gcc-3.0] reproducible internal compiler error Tags added: fixed tags 46181 + fixed Bug#46181: [fixed in 2.96] c++ error message improvement suggestion Tags added: fixed tags 59005 + fixed Bug#59005: [fix with libstdc++-v3] compilation error in stl_alloc.h with -fhonor-std Tags added: fixed tags 68963 + fixed Bug#68963: [fixed upstream] libstdc++2.10 has no method at() in stl_= Tags added: fixed tags 68987 + fixed Bug#68987: [fixed in gobjc-2.97] Interface to garbage collector is undocumented. Tags added: fixed tags 75120 + fixed Bug#75120: [fixed upstream 001117] bad_alloc and std:: namespace Tags added: fixed tags 76827 + fixed Bug#76827: [fixed upstream 001117] Excessive warnings from headers with
Processed: Bug#101795: dist-upgrade fails: perl: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2' not found (required by /lib/libdb.so.3)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 101795 perl Bug#101795: dist-upgrade fails: perl: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2' not found (required by /lib/libdb.so.3) Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++2.10-dev' to `perl'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#101901: marked as done (g++-3.0 and --use-cxa-atexit)
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jun 2001 10:25:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 22 05:25:43 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bacchus.lis.inpg.fr [:::195.220.21.21] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15DO8E-0005Ti-00; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 05:25:43 -0500 Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.220.21.167]) by bacchus.lis.inpg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3/cf de Bacchus - 25/05/2000) with ESMTP id MAA23450; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:25:35 +0200 Received: from bonnaud by irancy.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15DO85-0008P5-00; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:25:33 +0200 From: laurent bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: g++-3.0 and --use-cxa-atexit X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:25:33 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: laurent bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: g++-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-1 Severity: normal Hi, according to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#known, it would seem to be a good idea to compile g++-3.0 with the --use-cxa-atexit switch: Global destructors are not run in the correct order Global destructors should be run in the reverse order of their constructors completing. In most cases this is the same as the reverse order of constructors starting, but sometimes it is different, and that is important. You need to compile and link your programs with --use-cxa-atexit. We have not turned this switch on by default, as it requires a cxa aware runtime library (libc, glibc, or equivalent). A more detailed explanation is given in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/1999-12n/msg00664.html -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux irancy 2.4.4-686 #1 Sun Apr 29 12:22:40 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages g++-3.0 depends on: ii gcc-3.0 1:3.0-1The GNU C compiler. ii gcc-3.0-base 1:3.0-1The GNU compiler collection (base ii libc6 2.2.3-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libstdc++3-dev1:3.0-1The GNU stdc++ library version 3 ( --- Received: (at 101901-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2001 20:08:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 15:08:27 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15EGBD-0002jv-00; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:08:23 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA06912; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5OK49q22629; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0-2 X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Add libgcc0 and libgcc300 to the build conflicts (#102041). * debian/README.FIRST: Removed (#101534). * Updated subreg-byte patch (doc files). * Disable java for the Hurd, mips and mipsel (#101570). * Patch for building on the Hurd (#101708) (Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]). * Packaging fixes for the Hurd (#101711) (Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]). * Include pregenerated doxygen (1.2.6) docs for libstdc++-v3 (#101557). The current doxygen-1.2.8.1 segaults. * C++: Enable -fuse-cxa-atexit by default (#101901). * Correct mail address in gccbug (#101743). * Make rules resumable after failure in binary-xxx targets (#101637).
Bug#102041: marked as done (libgcj2-dev depends on nonexisting libgcc0)
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2001 23:25:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 23 18:25:15 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from itaipu.nitnet.com.br [:::200.255.111.241] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15DwmA-0004xp-00; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:25:14 -0500 Received: (qmail 27849 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2001 23:24:52 - Received: from salzburg.nitnet.com.br (HELO flower.cesarb) (200.198.84.62) by itaipu.nitnet.com.br with SMTP; 23 Jun 2001 23:24:52 - Received: from cesarb by flower.cesarb with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15Dwlo-00016V-00; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:24:52 -0300 From: Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgcj2-dev depends on nonexisting libgcc0 X-Reportbug-Version: 1.17 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.17 Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:24:51 -0300 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libgcj2-dev Version: 1:3.0-1 Severity: grave dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgcj2-dev: libgcj2-dev depends on libgcc0 (= 1:3.0-0pre010613); however: Package libgcc0 is not installed. dpkg: error processing libgcj2-dev (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gcj-3.0: gcj-3.0 depends on libgcj2-dev (= 1:3.0-1); however: Package libgcj2-dev is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing gcj-3.0 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: libgcj2-dev gcj-3.0 -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux flower 2.4.5 #1 Tue May 29 18:09:30 BRT 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 Versions of packages libgcj2-dev depends on: pn gcj-3.0 (= 1:3.0-1) Not found. ii libc6 2.2.3-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libc6-dev 2.2.3-5GNU C Library: Development Librari pn libgcc0 (= 1:3.0-0pre010613)Not found. ii libgcj2 1:3.0-1Java runtime library for use with ii zlib1g1:1.1.3-15 compression library - runtime ii zlib1g-dev1:1.1.3-15 compression library - development --- Received: (at 102041-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2001 20:08:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 15:08:24 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15EGBD-0002jv-00; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:08:23 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA06912; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5OK49q22629; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0-2 X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Add libgcc0 and libgcc300 to the build conflicts (#102041). * debian/README.FIRST: Removed (#101534). * Updated subreg-byte patch (doc files). * Disable java for the Hurd, mips and mipsel (#101570). * Patch for building on the Hurd (#101708) (Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]). * Packaging fixes for the Hurd (#101711) (Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]). * Include pregenerated doxygen (1.2.6) docs for libstdc++-v3 (#101557). The current doxygen-1.2.8.1 segaults. * C++: Enable -fuse-cxa-atexit by default (#101901). * Correct mail address in gccbug (#101743). * Make rules resumable after failure in binary-xxx targets
Bug#101743: marked as done (gccbug-3.0 failure)
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2001 08:16:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 21 03:16:29 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bacchus.lis.inpg.fr [:::195.220.21.21] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15Czdc-0004O9-00; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 03:16:28 -0500 Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.220.21.167]) by bacchus.lis.inpg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3/cf de Bacchus - 25/05/2000) with ESMTP id KAA04725; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:16:24 +0200 Received: from bonnaud by irancy.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15CzdX-00080M-00; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:16:23 +0200 From: laurent bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gccbug-3.0 failure X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:16:22 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: laurent bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-1 Severity: normal Hi, I tried to use gccbug to report a gcc bug, but failed: $ gccbug-3.0 a)bort, e)dit or s)end? s gccbug-3.0: mysterious mail failure. gccbug-3.0: the problem report remains in /tmp/pbaddUwzq0 and is not sent. Perhaps I did something wrong while editing the report, but in this case gccbug should provide more info on my mistakes. You'll find below the file I edited... -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux irancy 2.4.4-686 #1 Sun Apr 29 12:22:40 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages gcc-3.0 depends on: ii binutils 2.11.90.0.7-2 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii cpp-3.01:3.0-1 The GNU C preprocessor. ii gcc-3.0-base 1:3.0-1 The GNU compiler collection (base ii libc6 2.2.3-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc11:3.0-1 GCC support library. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] debian-gcc@lists.debian.org Subject: g++ 3.0 ICE compiling mozilla From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-send-pr-version: 3.113 X-GNATS-Notify: Submitter-Id: net-debian Originator: Organization: Confidential: no Synopsis: g++ segfaults Severity: serious Priority: medium Category: optimization Class: ice-on-legal-code Release: 3.0 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable) Environment: System: Linux irancy 2.4.4-686 #1 Sun Apr 29 12:22:40 EST 2001 i686 unknown Architecture: i686 host: i386-pc-linux-gnu build: i386-pc-linux-gnu target: i386-pc-linux-gnu configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --prefix=/usr --infodir=/share/info --mandir=/share/man --enable-shared --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls --without-x --without-included-gettext --disable-checking --enable-threads=posix --enable-java-gc=boehm --with-cpp-install-dir=bin --enable-objc-gc i386-linux Description: $ g++ -c -O3 nsFormControlHelper.ii nsFormControlHelper.cpp: In static member function `static void nsFormControlHelper::PaintFixedSizeCheckMark(nsIRenderingContext, float)': nsFormControlHelper.cpp:731: Internal error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html for instructions. How-To-Repeat: Use preprocessed file below Fix: Compiling with -O2 works [600 KB of preprocessed output] --- Received: (at 101743-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2001 20:08:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 15:08:27 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15EGBD-0002jv-00; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:08:23 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA06912; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5OK49q22629; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version
Bug#101570: marked as done (gcc-3.0_3.0.ds9-1(unstable):)
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2001 03:56:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 19 22:56:06 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h24-78-251-235.vc.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [:::24.78.251.235] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15CZ66-00029H-00; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:56:06 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id UAA13315 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:55:56 -0700 From: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:55:56 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-3.0_3.0.ds9-1(unstable): Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 3.0.ds9-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of gcc-3.0_3.0.ds9-1 on resume.rfc822.org by sbuild/mips 1.158 Build started at 20010620-0013 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: m4, autoconf (= 2.13), libtool, gawk, dejagnu (= 1.4), bzip2, binutils (= 2.10.1), debhelper (= 3.0.25), gperf (= 2.7-3), bison, flex, gettext, texinfo, zlib1g-dev, libgc5-dev [!avr !hurd-i386 !m68k] [...] checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for gcc... (cached) /build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.ds9/build/gcc/xgcc -B/build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.ds9/build/gcc/ -B/usr/mips-linux/bin/ -B/usr/mips-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/mips-linux/include checking whether the C compiler (/build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.ds9/build/gcc/xgcc -B/build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.ds9/build/gcc/ -B/usr/mips-linux/bin/ -B/usr/mips-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/mips-linux/include ) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (/build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.ds9/build/gcc/xgcc -B/build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.ds9/build/gcc/ -B/usr/mips-linux/bin/ -B/usr/mips-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/mips-linux/include ) is a cross-compiler... no checking whether we are using GNU C... (cached) yes checking whether /build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.ds9/build/gcc/xgcc -B/build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.ds9/build/gcc/ -B/usr/mips-linux/bin/ -B/usr/mips-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/mips-linux/include accepts -g... (cached) yes configure: error: libffi has not been ported to mips-mips-linux-gnu. make[3]: *** [configure-target-libffi] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.ds9/build' make[2]: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.ds9/build' s=`cat status`; rm -f status; test $s -eq 0 make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.ds9' make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2 --- Received: (at 101570-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2001 20:08:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 15:08:26 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15EGBD-0002jv-00; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:08:23 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA06912; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5OK49q22629; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0-2 X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Add libgcc0 and libgcc300 to the build conflicts (#102041). * debian/README.FIRST: Removed (#101534). * Updated subreg-byte patch (doc files). * Disable java for the Hurd, mips and mipsel (#101570). * Patch for building on the
Bug#101637: marked as done (Cannot resume after failure in binary-libstdcxx.mk)
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2001 16:21:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 20 11:21:18 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from olympus.nisa.net [:::207.194.212.100] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15CkjG-0008Es-00; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:21:18 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by olympus.nisa.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) id f5KGKsI02547 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:20:54 -0700 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:20:54 -0700 From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cannot resume after failure in binary-libstdcxx.mk Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 3.0.ds8-0pre010613 While porting to the Hurd, I came across a bug in binary-libstdcxx.mk. I corrected the bug and reran `debian/rules binary-arch'. However, because it had *already* moved some files around, it's not capable of resuming where it was after a failure. (These fixes will be sent in a seperate bug report...) I suspect the best fix is to 'rm 07-install-stamp' at the beginning of each new section where files are moved around, and then touch it again when everything is in a resumable state again. The install step could then still skip the succesful sections that had been copied correctly. Tks, Jeff Bailey --- Received: (at 101637-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2001 20:08:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 15:08:27 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15EGBD-0002jv-00; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:08:23 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA06912; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5OK49q22629; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0-2 X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Add libgcc0 and libgcc300 to the build conflicts (#102041). * debian/README.FIRST: Removed (#101534). * Updated subreg-byte patch (doc files). * Disable java for the Hurd, mips and mipsel (#101570). * Patch for building on the Hurd (#101708) (Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]). * Packaging fixes for the Hurd (#101711) (Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]). * Include pregenerated doxygen (1.2.6) docs for libstdc++-v3 (#101557). The current doxygen-1.2.8.1 segaults. * C++: Enable -fuse-cxa-atexit by default (#101901). * Correct mail address in gccbug (#101743). * Make rules resumable after failure in binary-xxx targets (#101637).
Bug#101534: marked as done (README.FIRST says gcc-3.0 is a development snapshot)
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2001 21:19:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 19 16:19:31 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from maila.telia.com [:::194.22.194.231] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15CSuJ-0001N6-00; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:19:31 -0500 Received: from d1o87.telia.com (d1o87.telia.com [213.65.232.241]) by maila.telia.com (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5JLJR020440 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:19:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sledgehammer (h254n2fls33o87.telia.com [213.67.58.254]) by d1o87.telia.com (8.10.2/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f5JLJQd23527 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:19:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from andre by sledgehammer with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15CT0S-DE-00; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:25:52 +0200 From: André Dahlqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: README.FIRST says gcc-3.0 is a development snapshot X-Reportbug-Version: 1.17 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.17 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:25:51 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Dahlqvist?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0-base Version: 1:3.0-1 Severity: minor The info in /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.0-base/README.FIRST does not longer apply now that gcc-3.0 has been released as stable. It can safely be removed. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux sledgehammer 2.4.5-ac15 #3 Mon Jun 18 17:15:03 CEST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE --- Received: (at 101534-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2001 20:08:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 15:08:25 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15EGBD-0002jv-00; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:08:23 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA06912; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5OK49q22629; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.0-2 X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Add libgcc0 and libgcc300 to the build conflicts (#102041). * debian/README.FIRST: Removed (#101534). * Updated subreg-byte patch (doc files). * Disable java for the Hurd, mips and mipsel (#101570). * Patch for building on the Hurd (#101708) (Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]). * Packaging fixes for the Hurd (#101711) (Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]). * Include pregenerated doxygen (1.2.6) docs for libstdc++-v3 (#101557). The current doxygen-1.2.8.1 segaults. * C++: Enable -fuse-cxa-atexit by default (#101901). * Correct mail address in gccbug (#101743). * Make rules resumable after failure in binary-xxx targets (#101637).
Bug#58412: marked as done ([alpha] r-base: Can't build from source)
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:27:14 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line r-base on alpha has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2000 16:37:29 + Received: (qmail 1224 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2000 16:37:29 - Received: from va.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 16:37:29 - Received: from erwin.complete.org [209.197.212.34] (root) by va.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 12LqPH-zw-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:37:28 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by erwin.complete.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id KAA25224; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:37:26 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: erwin.complete.org: jgoerzen set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: r-base: Can't build from source From: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 18 Feb 2000 10:37:26 -0600 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lines: 25 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Package: r-base Severity: important Version: 0.99.0-2 removing /home/buildd/build/r-base-0.99.0/debian/tmp/usr/lib/R/library/base/help/license removing /home/buildd/build/r-base-0.99.0/debian/tmp/usr/lib/R/library/base/latex/license.tex removing /home/buildd/build/r-base-0.99.0/debian/tmp/usr/lib/R/COPYING dh_installdocs BUGS Y2K cp: doc/manual/R-intro.pdf: No such file or directory cp: doc/manual/R-exts.pdf: No such file or directory dh_installdocs: command returned error code make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 You can find the complete log of the failed build for this package at: http://www.complete.org/~buildd/logs/r-base_0.99.0-2_2216-2229 This is on a DEC Alpha system running the unstable distribution. Linux erwin 2.2.15pre5 #1 Sun Feb 13 20:51:24 CST 2000 alpha unknown -- John Goerzen Linux, Unix consulting programming [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Developer, Debian GNU/Linux (Free powerful OS upgrade) www.debian.org | + The 10,778,637th prime number is 194,259,349. --- Received: (at 58412-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2001 22:27:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 17:27:38 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15EILy-00042C-00; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 17:27:38 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA21075 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:27:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5OMRFJ19071; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:27:15 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:27:14 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: r-base on alpha X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I see r-base on alpha built in May (with 2.95.4). Closing the report. Please reopen the report if you think, that it's not yet fixed.
Bug#51266: marked as done ([fixed upstream 20010121] Internal compiler error in `emit_move_insn_1' when compiling xt)
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcj-3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 1999 16:09:37 + Received: (qmail 21897 invoked from network); 25 Nov 1999 16:09:36 - Received: from nefertiti.pasteur.fr (157.99.64.20) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 1999 16:09:36 - Received: from ezili.sis.pasteur.fr (ezili.sis.pasteur.fr [157.99.60.56]) by nefertiti.pasteur.fr (8.10.0.Beta6/8.10.0.Beta6) with ESMTP id dAPG9XL18423; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 17:09:33 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by ezili.sis.pasteur.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id RAA24399; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 17:09:40 +0100 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 17:09:40 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcj: Internal compiler error in `emit_move_insn_1' when compiling xt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.2.6.1 Package: gcj Version: 1:2.95.2-2 Severity: normal ezili:~/infosystems/XML/Java gcj /usr/share/java/repository/com/jclark/xsl/sax/Driver.class com/jclark/xsl/sax/Driver.java: In class `com.jclark.xsl.sax.Driver': com/jclark/xsl/sax/Driver.java: In method `transform(com.jclark.xsl.sax.XSLProcessor,org.xml.sax.InputSource,org.xml.sax.InputSource)': com/jclark/xsl/sax/Driver.java:104: Class 'com.jclark.xsl.sax.XSLProcessor' has no method named 'parse' matching signature '(Lorg/xml/sax/InputSource;)V' com/jclark/xsl/sax/Driver.java:105: Internal compiler error in `emit_move_insn_1', at expr.c:2754 Please submit a full bug report. See URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/faq.html#bugreport for instructions. The .class is available in the lib-xt-java package. -- System Information Debian Release: potato Kernel Version: Linux ezili 2.2.12 #2 Tue Sep 28 16:41:53 CEST 1999 i586 unknown Versions of the packages gcj depends on: ii gcc 2.95.2-2 The GNU C compiler. ii java-common 0.2Base of all Java packages ii libc6 2.1.2-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone ii libgcj0-dev 2.95.1-2 Java runtime library for use with gcj ii libgcj0-dev 2.95.1-2 Java runtime library for use with gcj ^^^ (Provides virtual package libgcj-dev) --- Received: (at 51266-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2001 21:33:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 16:33:06 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15EHVB-CW-00; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:33:05 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA15811; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5OLV6G27710; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcj-3.0 X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The bugs in these reports are fixed in gcj-3.0. The final release of gcc-3.0 (including gcj-3.0) is currently available in the testing distribution. We plan to remove gcj-2.95 and libgcj-2.95.1 from testing and unstable.
Bug#51227: marked as done ([fixed in libgcj CVS 20000303] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError when doing Runtime.exec)
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in gcj-3.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 1999 08:09:45 +
Received: (qmail 25430 invoked from network); 25 Nov 1999 08:09:44 -
Received: from nefertiti.pasteur.fr (157.99.64.20)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 1999 08:09:44 -
Received: from ezili.sis.pasteur.fr (ezili.sis.pasteur.fr [157.99.60.56])
by nefertiti.pasteur.fr (8.10.0.Beta6/8.10.0.Beta6) with ESMTP id
dAP89bL29204;
Thu, 25 Nov 1999 09:09:37 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by ezili.sis.pasteur.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id JAA07227;
Thu, 25 Nov 1999 09:09:44 +0100
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 09:09:44 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcj: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError when doing Runtime.exec
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.6.1
Package: gcj
Version: 1:2.95.2-2
Severity: normal
A program which uses Runtime.exec works fine when compiled as bytecode
but not when compiled as native code.
Here is the program:
import java.io.DataInputStream;
import java.io.InputStream;
public class Execute {
public static void main (String []arguments) throws java.io.IOException
{
boolean over = false;
String line;
Runtime syst = Runtime.getRuntime ();
Process p = syst.exec (ls);
DataInputStream stdout = new DataInputStream (p.getInputStream ());
while (! over) {
line = stdout.readLine ();
if (line == null) {
over = true;
}
else {
System.out.println (line);
}
}
}
}
Here is the output:
1) OK
ezili:~/etudes/Java/essais gcj -C Execute.java
ezili:~/etudes/Java/essais java Execute
Execute.class
Execute.java
Execute.java~
a.out
2) Not OK
ezili:~/etudes/Java/essais gcj --main=Execute -o Execute Execute.java
ezili:~/etudes/Java/essais ./Execute
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux ezili 2.2.12 #2 Tue Sep 28 16:41:53 CEST 1999 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages gcj depends on:
ii gcc 2.95.2-2 The GNU C compiler.
ii java-common 0.2Base of all Java packages
ii libc6 2.1.2-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii libgcj0-dev 2.95.1-2 Java runtime library for use with gcj
ii libgcj0-dev 2.95.1-2 Java runtime library for use with gcj
^^^ (Provides virtual package libgcj-dev)
---
Received: (at 51227-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2001 21:33:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 16:33:05 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15EHVB-CW-00; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:33:05 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA15811;
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5OLV6G27710;
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in gcj-3.0
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The bugs in these reports are fixed in gcj-3.0. The final release of
gcc-3.0 (including gcj-3.0) is currently available in the testing
distribution. We plan to remove gcj-2.95 and libgcj-2.95.1 from
testing and unstable.
Bug#102198: marked as done (libgcc_s.so.0 not found)
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:43:00 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#102198: libgcc_s.so.0 not found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2001 10:36:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 05:36:07 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from trias.softlab.se [:::192.36.210.130]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15ETiw-0003pS-00; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 05:36:06 -0500
Received: from hunny.softlab.se (hunny.softlab.se [193.180.167.104])
by trias.softlab.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAE746FE6
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:36:16 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from robyn.softlab.se. (robyn [193.180.167.75])
by hunny.softlab.se (Postfix) with SMTP
id 8D09D17AD10; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:35:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by robyn.softlab.se. (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Jun 2001
12:35:46 +0200
From: Patrik Hagglund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgcc_s.so.0 not found
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:35:46 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcj
Version: 2:3.0-4
Severity: important
Tags: sid
Hello.java EOF
public class Hello {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(Hello!);
}
}
EOF
/usr/bin/gcj --main=Hello Hello.java
./a.out
./a.out: error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux robyn 2.4.4 #1 tor maj 31 09:14:36 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO8859-1
Versions of packages gcj depends on:
ii cpp 2:2.95.4-2 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii g++-3.0 1:3.0-2The GNU C++ compiler.
ii gcj-3.0 1:3.0-2The GNU compiler for Java(TM).
---
Received: (at 102198-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2001 17:49:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 12:49:12 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15EaU3-0005pw-00; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:49:11 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA00029;
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:43:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5PHh0V15749;
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:43:00 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:43:00 +0200
To: Patrik Hagglund [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#102198: libgcc_s.so.0 not found
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please upgrade to gcj-3.0-2 (or wait for gcj-3.0-3, which is
currently in incoming).
Patrik Hagglund writes:
Package: gcj
Version: 2:3.0-4
Severity: important
Tags: sid
Hello.java EOF
public class Hello {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(Hello!);
}
}
EOF
/usr/bin/gcj --main=Hello Hello.java
./a.out
./a.out: error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux robyn 2.4.4 #1 tor maj 31 09:14:36 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO8859-1
Versions of packages gcj depends on:
ii cpp 2:2.95.4-2 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii g++-3.0 1:3.0-2The GNU C++ compiler.
ii gcj-3.0 1:3.0-2The GNU compiler for Java(TM).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#100983: marked as done (gcc-3.0-010613 refuses to compile programs)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:22:42 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Processed: has this been fixed? or still there? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2001 11:23:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 15 06:23:57 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zikova.cvut.cz [:::147.32.235.100] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15Arhk-Tz-00; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 06:23:56 -0500 Received: from vana.vc.cvut.cz ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [147.32.240.58]) by zikova.cvut.cz (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id OAA17250 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:11:38 +0200 Received: from vana.vc.cvut.cz ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id f5FBMVBT021386 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:22:31 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by vana.vc.cvut.cz (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) id f5FBMVgL021377 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:22:31 +0200 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:22:25 +0200 From: Petr Vandrovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-3.0-010613 refuses to compile programs Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libgcc0 Version: 3.0-0pre010613 Severity: critical Hi, gcc-3.0_3.0-0pre010613 contains lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2001-06-14 03:05:57 ./usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so - /lib/libgcc_s.so.0 while libgcc0_3.0-0pre010613 contains -rw-r--r-- root/root 27036 2001-06-14 03:04:26 ./lib/libgcc_s.so.1 So either symlink is wrong (in this case reassign it to gcc-3.0), or it should be libgcc_s.so.0, or this package should change name to libgcc1 to allow coexistence with old libgcc0... This change broke all programs compiled with gcc-3.0 on my box (I know, no backward compatibility...), and I could not compile anything new. So I renamed gcc_s.so.1 to gcc_s.so.0. I'm using critical severity as I just found that I cannot send this report because of sendmail depends on /lib/libgcc_s.so.0 :-( Thanks, Petr Vandrovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 100983-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jun 2001 21:25:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 16:25:09 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15F0KZ-0007LD-00; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:25:07 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA16485; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:22:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5QLMgN19137; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:22:42 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:22:42 +0200 To: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Processed: has this been fixed? or still there? In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks. fixed with libgcc1-3.0-[123]
Processed: kicq is built for unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 79241 kicq Bug#79241: improper (or failed) handeling of -I Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `kicq'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: report #84935
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 84935 aptitude Bug#84935: g++ fails to compile aptitude on the mips architecture Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `aptitude'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#65364: marked as done ([alpha] main() {char data[10000000];} crashes)
Your message dated 29 Jun 2001 23:47:23 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line [alpha] main() {char data[1000];} crashes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2000 09:19:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 08 04:19:53 2000
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mx02.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.3.12]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 12zyTg-0002kC-00; Thu, 08 Jun 2000 04:19:52 -0500
Received: from borkum (p1ks117.extern.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.226.117])
by mx02.uni-tuebingen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08676;
Thu, 8 Jun 2000 11:19:49 +0200
Received: by zxmjz18.extern.uni-tuebingen.de
via sendmail from stdin
id [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:45:49 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: main() {char data[1000];} crashes on Alpha
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 10:45:49 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc
Version: 1:2.95.2-12
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/gcc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/pq% cat bug.c
int main() {
char data[1000];
return 0;
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/pq% gcc bug.c -o bug
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/pq% ./bug
zsh: segmentation fault (core dumped) ./bug
Slightly less, like 500, works ok.
I have 128 MB of memory, so that shouldn't be the problem.
It also works on i386.
Falk
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux borkum 2.2.14 #1 Tue May 30 01:00:41 CEST 2000 alpha
Versions of packages gcc depends on:
ii binutils2.9.5.0.37-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp 1:2.95.2-12 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii libc6.1 2.1.3-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
---
Received: (at 65364-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2001 21:47:43 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 29 16:47:43 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.de)
[:::194.25.134.80]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15G675-0004HP-00; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:47:43 -0500
Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.de
by mailout01.sul.t-online.de with smtp
id 15G670-0002KA-03; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:47:38 +0200
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fmrl01.sul.t-online.com
with esmtp id 15G66n-1YyUMKC; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:47:25 +0200
Received: from falk by localhost with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15G66l-FO-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 23:47:23 +0200
X-Face: Q)4Pn.JVfRz{G(G_eIkykbZGG\)2mk8:5a{^Mk07iC#F.t2L7hSa|7Zr1_L8[nbiq:8F
%o\(7|]{*cFg$GEPDdun~+UTjG(^4z_Ksw%L-\w0xDmUR~zsnGH]sK=M\Y=;U4XZz)[CX6I6d
_p
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [alpha] main() {char data[1000];} crashes
From: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 29 Jun 2001 23:47:23 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lines: 6
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.2 (Molpe)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
As already mentioned in previous posts, this is actually a problem
with the stack size limit, and not a bug in gcc, so I close it.
Falk
Bug#100571: marked as done (libstdc++2.10-dev: sstream still buggy in 2.95.4-0.010604)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2001 08:16:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 12 03:16:29 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from scn2.rtbf.be [:::194.119.253.74] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 159jLh-0003v5-00; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 03:16:29 -0500 Received: from rtbf.be ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by scn2.rtbf.be (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA14623; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:17:22 +0200 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:12:20 +0200 From: G. Angely [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: RTBF X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libstdc++2.10-dev: sstream still buggy in 2.95.4-0.010604 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libstdc++2.10-dev Version: 2.95.4-0.010604 With this last version (and the former 2.95.4) I have severe exec time penality on programs compiled with libstdc++2.10-dev_2.95.4 (woody and sid) vs. _2.95.2 (potato). This seems to come from buggy sstream already reported as #92524. Gaetan A. --- Received: (at 100571-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2001 22:18:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 29 17:18:37 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15G6ay-000604-00; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:18:36 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA19309; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5TMHTV11620; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628 X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Updated sources to CVS 20010628 (last change 20010619). * Updated gpc (20010623). * fix libstdc++-dev's prerm (closes #102191). * debian/patches/libstdc++-sstream.dpatch: New patch (closes #92524,#100571). * debian/control.in: Add Uploaders: field. * debian/patches/arm-tune.dpatch, debian/patches/arm-output-int.dpatch: New patches.
Bug#92524: marked as done (Severe performance problem with sstream)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2001 07:08:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 02 02:08:07 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp2.ihug.co.nz [203.109.252.8] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14jyRa-tp-00; Mon, 02 Apr 2001 02:08:06 -0500 Received: from sucky.fish (p290-tnt4.akl.ihug.co.nz [203.173.213.36]) by smtp2.ihug.co.nz (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id TAA32052 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 19:07:59 +1200 X-Authentication-Warning: smtp2.ihug.co.nz: Host p290-tnt4.akl.ihug.co.nz [203.173.213.36] claimed to be sucky.fish Received: from sucky-fish (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sucky.fish (8.11.3/8.11.1/Debian 8.11.0-6) with ESMTP id f3277ve09310 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 19:07:58 +1200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Severe performance problem with sstream From: Ralph Loader [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution (0.9 - Preview Release) Date: 02 Apr 2001 19:07:57 +1200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libstdc++2.10-dev Version: 2.95.3-9 The CPU time taken by stringstream is quadratic in the length of the string buffer. This makes stringstream unusable for large (but not unreasonably large) contents. The problem is this line in std::stringbuf::overflow: stream_len += 1; which increases the size of the buffer by 1 character at a time. Changing it to something like stream_len += stream_len + 1; fixes the problem. Ralph. --- Received: (at 100571-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2001 22:18:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 29 17:18:37 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15G6ay-000604-00; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:18:36 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA19309; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5TMHTV11620; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628 X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Updated sources to CVS 20010628 (last change 20010619). * Updated gpc (20010623). * fix libstdc++-dev's prerm (closes #102191). * debian/patches/libstdc++-sstream.dpatch: New patch (closes #92524,#100571). * debian/control.in: Add Uploaders: field. * debian/patches/arm-tune.dpatch, debian/patches/arm-output-int.dpatch: New patches.
Bug#101876: marked as done (please change ia64 default to 2.96)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-defaults-0.11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jun 2001 06:39:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 22 01:39:26 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [:::207.217.120.62] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15DKbF-000701-00; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:39:25 -0500 Received: from rover.gag.com (sdn-ar-006coauroP085.dialsprint.net [168.191.172.173]) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA06507 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rover.gag.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 86D683BE98; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:39:04 -0600 (MDT) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: please change ia64 default to 2.96 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:39:04 -0600 (MDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bdale Garbee) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-defaults Version: 0.8 Severity: serious Hi. We are replacing the hackish 'gnupro' toolchain package for ia64 with properly crafted 2.96 packages as defaults, and 3.0 available as an option. Please change the gcc-defaults package to use 2.96 as the default for ia64. I'm making this bug release critical since it needs to be resolved before woody's release. Patch from 0.8 to what I'm calling 0.8.1 is attached, which yields 2.96-1 versions for ia64 which will be uploaded. When you merge the patch, do whatever feels right to you for the version suffix... I see no real value in the REL_NO_30 stuff, but if you want to create a REL_NO_296 we won't mind. Thanks! Bdale diff -u -r gcc-defaults-0.8/debian/changelog gcc-defaults-0.8.1/debian/changelog --- gcc-defaults-0.8/debian/changelog Sat May 26 18:26:06 2001 +++ gcc-defaults-0.8.1/debian/changelog Fri Jun 22 00:08:37 2001 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +gcc-defaults (0.8.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * IA-64 currently uses 2.96 as the default and will soon have 3.0 as an +option. Reflect the correct default here, we had assumed 3.0 previously. + + -- Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:16:08 -0600 + gcc-defaults (0.8) unstable; urgency=low * Update version number to 2.95.4 (except m68k). diff -u -r gcc-defaults-0.8/debian/rules gcc-defaults-0.8.1/debian/rules --- gcc-defaults-0.8/debian/rules Fri May 11 01:36:16 2001 +++ gcc-defaults-0.8.1/debian/rules Fri Jun 22 00:04:12 2001 @@ -40,15 +40,15 @@ endif ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),ia64-linux) -CV_CPP := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30) -CV_GCC := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30) -CV_GPP := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30) -CV_GOBJC := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30) -CV_G77 := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30) -CV_CHILL := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30) -CV_GCJ := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30) -CV_GPC := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30) -packages := c++ fortran java objc +CV_CPP := 2.96-$(REL_NO) +CV_GCC := 2.96-$(REL_NO) +CV_GPP := 2.96-$(REL_NO) +CV_GOBJC := 2.96-$(REL_NO) +CV_G77 := 2.96-$(REL_NO) +CV_CHILL := 2.96-$(REL_NO) +CV_GCJ := 2.96-$(REL_NO) +CV_GPC := 2.96-$(REL_NO) +packages := c++ fortran objc endif ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),i386-linux) --- Received: (at 101876-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2001 22:18:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 29 17:18:17 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15G6ae-000604-00; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:18:17 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA19110; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5TMEmB10692; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-defaults-0.11 X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fixed in gcc-defaults-0.11.
Bug#102191: marked as done (libstdc++2.10-dev has unset $pkg_ver in prerm)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2001 08:54:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 03:54:49 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c1494421-a.alntn1.tx.home.com (lapdoog.doogie.org) [:::24.4.56.213] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15ES8u-ff-00; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 03:54:49 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by lapdoog.doogie.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15EIqf-0003j3-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 17:59:21 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 17:59:21 -0500 (CDT) From: Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libstdc++2.10-dev has unset $pkg_ver in prerm Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] package: libstdc++2.10 version: 1:2.95.2-14 yakko:/mount/md0/mirror# cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libstdc++2.10-dev.prerm #! /bin/sh -e if [ \( $1 = upgrade -o $1 = remove \) -a -L /usr/doc/libstdc++2.10-dev ]; then rm -f /usr/doc/libstdc++2.10-dev; fi install-info --quiet --remove iostream$pkg_ver -- Note how $pkg_ver is not set. Looking at the postinst, there is a value, and no variable. This appears to be a problem with some file munging in debian/rules, but I haven't checked there. --- Received: (at 102191-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2001 22:18:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 29 17:18:37 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15G6ay-000604-00; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:18:36 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA19309; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5TMHTV11620; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628 X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Updated sources to CVS 20010628 (last change 20010619). * Updated gpc (20010623). * fix libstdc++-dev's prerm (closes #102191). * debian/patches/libstdc++-sstream.dpatch: New patch (closes #92524,#100571). * debian/control.in: Add Uploaders: field. * debian/patches/arm-tune.dpatch, debian/patches/arm-output-int.dpatch: New patches.
Processed: reassign g77 report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 90363 + fixed Bug#90363: f77 miscompiles PIC on arm Tags added: fixed reassign 90363 g77-2.95 Bug#90363: f77 miscompiles PIC on arm Bug reassigned from package `g77' to `g77-2.95'. retitle 90363 [fixed in g77-3.0] f77 miscompiles PIC on arm Bug#90363: f77 miscompiles PIC on arm Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: reassign g++ bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 88260 g++-2.95 Bug#88260: No warning for missing return in non-void member func Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.95'. retitle 88260 [fixed in g++-3.0] No warning for missing return in non-void member func Bug#88260: No warning for missing return in non-void member func Changed Bug title. tags 88260 + fixed Bug#88260: [fixed in g++-3.0] No warning for missing return in non-void member func Tags added: fixed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#102451: marked as done (libgcj0-dev doesn't create required docs symlink)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:09:02 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#102451: libgcj0-dev doesn't create required docs symlink has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2001 02:50:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 21:50:35 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cmailg7.svr.pol.co.uk [:::195.92.195.177] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15F5PW-0006LN-00; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 21:50:34 -0500 Received: from [195.92.67.23] (helo=mail18.svr.pol.co.uk) by cmailg7.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15F5PU-uk-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:50:32 +0100 Received: from modem-176.clown-sweetlips.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.248.176] helo=eeyore.network) by mail18.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15F5PS-0001U3-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:50:31 +0100 Received: (qmail 2050 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2001 02:59:23 - Received: from ketchup.network ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by eeyore.network with SMTP; 27 Jun 2001 02:59:23 - Received: by ketchup.network (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:49:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:49:40 +0100 From: Isaac Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgcj0-dev doesn't create required docs symlink Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libgcj0-dev Version: 2.95.1-5 libgcj0-dev doesn't create the symlink from /usr/doc/libgcj0-dev - ../share/doc/libgcj0-dev that is required by Debian policy 13.4. This can be demonstrated with a test: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ test ! -L /usr/doc/libgcj0-dev echo symbolic link /usr/doc/libgcj0-dev - ../share/doc/libgcj0-dev is missing symbolic link /usr/doc/libgcj0-dev - ../share/doc/libgcj0-dev is missing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ --- Received: (at 102451-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2001 11:13:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 30 06:13:26 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15GIgo-0001Ga-00; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 06:13:26 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA08378; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:09:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5UB92114800; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:09:02 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:09:02 +0200 To: Isaac Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#102451: libgcj0-dev doesn't create required docs symlink In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] libgcj-2.95.1 will be removed from testing/unstable once the final gcc-3.0 hits testing. This will be before the release. Isaac Wilcox writes: Package: libgcj0-dev Version: 2.95.1-5 libgcj0-dev doesn't create the symlink from /usr/doc/libgcj0-dev - ../share/doc/libgcj0-dev that is required by Debian policy 13.4.
Bug#90143: marked as done (source parallelisation suggestion)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:14:14 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line source parallelisation suggestion has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2001 18:04:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 18 12:04:55 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ferret.phonewave.net (tarot.mentasm.org) [208.138.51.183] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14ehXy-000188-00; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 12:04:54 -0600 Received: from heathen.mentasm.org [192.168.1.43] (mail) by tarot.mentasm.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14ehXd-0001lG-00; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:04:33 -0800 Received: from idalton by heathen.mentasm.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14ehXu-00033P-00; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:04:50 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: source parallelisation suggestion X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14 Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:04:49 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.3-6 Severity: wishlist This request is spawned by virtue of building cross-compiler packages on a dual-Pentium 200. I would like for the Debian build system to be able to run the native compiles and the cross-compiler compiles concurrently. The current build system appears (in the course of my tinkering around) to mostly be able to do this already, except for the job control and the source extraction phase. I point out that (for instance) first the native compiler will be built in build-native/, then the sparc-cross built in build-sparc/, and both builds will only utilise one of my two processors. So if these two builds can be performed at the same time, both processors should be utilised. Error handling may also need to be changed. I think the best way to report a build error (most likely not having a build-depends for a target arch, or just a buggy compiler -), would be to stop ALL concurrent builds and to report the build branch and the error to the console. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux heathen 2.4.1 #1 SMP Thu Feb 1 13:32:45 PST 2001 i586 Versions of packages gcc-2.95 depends on: ii binutils 2.10.91.0.2-3 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii cpp-2.95 1:2.95.3-6The GNU C preprocessor. hi gcc1:2.95.3-5The GNU C compiler. ii libc6 2.2.2-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an --- Received: (at 90143-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2001 11:17:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 30 06:17:49 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15GIl3-0001KX-00; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 06:17:49 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA08712 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:14:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5UBEEa15074; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:14:14 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:14:14 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: source parallelisation suggestion X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I doubt that will be done for 2.95.4. the 3.0 packaging has another kind of support for building cross packages: you can only build the native compiler. If you want to build a cross compiler, set GCC_TARGET in the environment. Then only the cross compiler is built, not the native one.
Processed: tagging gcc reports
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 81338 wontfix Bug#81338: gcc272: gcc29166 Bug#74426: wishlist: add package for egcs/Alpha as an alternative Tags added: wontfix tags 74426 wontfix Bug#74426: wishlist: add package for egcs/Alpha as an alternative Bug#81338: gcc272: gcc29166 Tags added: wontfix tags 90143 wontfix Bug#90143: source parallelisation suggestion Tags added: wontfix thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #99038 to gcc-gnats as PR 3490
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 99038 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#99038: internal error using static synchronized Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 99038 [PR java/3490] internal error using static synchronized Bug#99038: internal error using static synchronized Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #102353 to gcc-gnats as PR 3492
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 102353 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#102353: -fno-bounds-check in combination with -W gives strange message Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 102353 [PR java/3492] -fno-bounds-check in combination with -W gives strange message Bug#102353: -fno-bounds-check in combination with -W gives strange message Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #85908 to gcc-gnats as PR 3487
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 85908 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#85908: gcc/cpp/stddef.h Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 85908 [PR preprocessor/3487] unrecognized token before #include points to wrong source Bug#85908: gcc/cpp/stddef.h Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #81122 to gcc-gnats as PR 3494
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 81122 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#81122: Internal compiler error (with wrong code, though) Forwarded-to-address changed from gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 81122 [PR c++/3494] Internal compiler error (with wrong code, though) Bug#81122: Internal compiler error (with wrong code, though) Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #55298 to gcc-gnats as PR 3481
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 55298 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#55298: function attributes should apply to function pointers too Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 55298 [PR c/3481] function attributes should apply to function pointers too Bug#55298: function attributes should apply to function pointers too Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: gcc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 20695 normal Bug#20695: regparm/profiling breakage (fixed with gcc-3.0) Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#81181: marked as done (gcc: sig 11, reproducible and not machine-specific)
Your message dated Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:28:56 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed with gcc-2.95.4 and gcc-3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2001 07:07:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 04 01:07:58 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [198.144.200.155] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14E4VC-0002lW-00; Thu, 04 Jan 2001 01:07:58 -0600 Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id AC2B5BC008; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 23:07:56 -0800 (PST) From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc: sig 11, reproducible and not machine-specific To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 23:07:56 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc Version: 1:2.95.3-4 Severity: normal On three seperate machines, when attempting to build pine from the debian source package via debian/rules build, we get: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/pine-4.31/imap/imapd' gcc -I../c-client `cat ../c-client/CFLAGS` -DANOFILE=\/etc/anonymous.newsgroups\ -DALERTFILE=\/etc/imapd.alert\ -DUSERALERTFILE=\.imapalert\ -c -o imapd.o imapd.c gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 make[3]: *** [imapd.o] Error 1 Always fails in the same place, etc, so this looks like a gcc bug and not one of the other problems often associated with gcc sig 11. A system with 1:2.95.2-18 does not exhibit the problem. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux kite 2.2.17 #1 Tue Oct 31 09:54:30 PST 2000 i686 unknown Versions of the packages gcc depends on: ii cpp2.95.3-4 The GNU C preprocessor. ii cpp-2.95 2.95.3-2.00123 The GNU C preprocessor. ii gcc-2.95 2.95.3-2.00123 The GNU C compiler. --- Received: (at 81181-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2001 12:32:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 01 07:32:59 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [:::130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15GgPK-0007bh-00; Sun, 01 Jul 2001 07:32:59 -0500 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA21458 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:28:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f61CSvE03306; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:28:57 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:28:56 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed with gcc-2.95.4 and gcc-3.0 X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) Cuyahoga Valley XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] checked on three ix86 machines. Translated the preprocessed source with -g -O2. gcc-2.95.4-0.010629 and gcc-3.0-4 work without segfault.
Processed: tagging gcc reports
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 102473 + unreproduceable Unknown tag/s: unreproduceable. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending. Bug#102473: #include_next does not work correctly in std_cstdio.h (and others) Tags added: tags 102473 + moreinfo Bug#102473: #include_next does not work correctly in std_cstdio.h (and others) Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: forwarded gcc bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 100166 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Bug#100166: gcc-3.0: internal compiler error: unrecognized insn Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: reassign gcc report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 43170 g++-2.95 Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `g++-2.95'. tags 43170 + fixed Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class Tags added: fixed retitle 43170 [PR 40: deprecated in 3.0] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: reassign report to gcc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 84969 gcc Bug#84969: php4 doesn't compile on arm Bug#83550: Stable gcc can't compile PHP4 4.0.3 on arm Bug reassigned from package `php4' to `gcc'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle #84969 [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Bug#84969: php4 doesn't compile on arm Changed Bug title. retitle #83550 [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Bug#83550: Stable gcc can't compile PHP4 4.0.3 on arm Changed Bug title. forwarded 84969 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Bug#84969: [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Bug#83550: [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded 83550 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Bug#83550: [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Bug#84969: [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Forwarded-to-address changed from gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org to [EMAIL PROTECTED] merge 84969 83550 Bug#83550: [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Bug#84969: [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Merged 83550 84969. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #88959 to gcc-gnats as PR 3513
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 88959 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#88959: gcc: GCC doesn't merge substrings Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 88959 [PR optimization/3513]: GCC doesn't merge substrings Bug#88959: gcc: GCC doesn't merge substrings Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #85535 to gcc-gnats as PR 3508
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 85535 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#85535: gcc: builtin memcmp() could be optimised Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 85535 [PR optimization/3508]: builtin memcmp() could be optimised Bug#85535: gcc: builtin memcmp() could be optimised Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #75773 to gcc-gnats as PR 3507
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 75773 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#75773: gcc: appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on i386 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 75773 [PR optimization/3507]: appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on i386 Bug#75773: gcc: appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on i386 Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
