was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F
to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr
for research in Grid Computing. See https://www.grid5000.fr/
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
platform
gathering 9 sites and featuring a total of 5000 CPUs. It serves as a
testbed for research in Grid Computing. See https://www.grid5000.fr/
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F
was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net
was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D
On 16/12/07 at 23:53 +0100, Arthur Loiret wrote:
reassign 456596 gcc-defaults 1.61
thanks
Matthias,
Here is the diff against current SVN I already sent you.
Hi,
It would be great to fix this ASAP, as it makes a lot of packages
FTBFS...
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
/ubuntu/+source/gnat-4.1.
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D
plan include a move to gcj-4.3 as well?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL
was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas
probably means
that it's a random issue affecting all gcc packages...
Might be caused by a problem with the handling of parallel builds.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
reopen 464268
thanks
On 06/02/08 at 16:35 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 06/02/08 at 14:55 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
tag 464268 + unreproducible
thanks
I can't reproduce it anymore, so either it's a random failure, or
something changed between yesterday and today in unstable.
I can
a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
build with 8 parallel threads, I think this is another
symptom of #465671. Merging.
Maybe. Maybe it would be better to disable parallel builds for gnat-4.3?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F
On 26/04/08 at 01:50 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Lucas, have you been able to reproduce this bug?
No, gnat-4.3 still fails, but not this way (#477964).
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F
On 26/04/08 at 10:22 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
On 26/04/08 at 01:47 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
severity 477964 important
tags 477964 moreinfo
merge 477964 465671
thanks
I built the package built successfully without any problem on i386 and
amd64
On 26/04/08 at 13:57 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
On 26/04/08 at 01:50 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Lucas, have you been able to reproduce this bug?
No, gnat-4.3 still fails, but not this way (#477964).
Then I suggest closing this bug and concentrating on #477964
On 27/04/08 at 15:54 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tag 464268 + unreproducible
tag 464268 + moreinfo
severity 464268 important
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
reopen 464268
thanks
On 06/02/08 at 16:35 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 06/02/08 at 14:55 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote
!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber
FYI, upstream will provide a --enable-cld option in 4.3.1. So it's no
longer about having a Debian-specific patch, it's about enabling a
non-default configure option.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36079 .
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net
://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
failures.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 27/02/11 at 13:01 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
(-cc: debian-release)
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Matthias Klose wrote:
yes, explicitly disabled in the package, for a limited time. If you
keep this warning enabled, it will result in too many build
failures. Somebody needs to scan the
On 27/02/11 at 20:48 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Matthias Klose wrote:
this would require the build logs of all the *sucessful* builds from this
rebuild.
Indeed, grep -F '[-Wunused-but-set' does not dig up anything.
After the rebuild, I did grep for that on all logs, but didn't find
://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http
: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F
On 16/08/11 at 22:36 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tag 635126 + moreinfo help
thanks
are you still working on this, trying to get a test case?
Hi,
As I wrote in #634260:
n 24/07/11 at 12:19 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/07/11 at 12:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
builds on sid armhf
On 17/08/11 at 10:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 16/08/11 at 22:36 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
tag 635126 + moreinfo help
thanks
are you still working on this, trying to get a test case?
Hi,
As I wrote in #634260:
n 24/07/11 at 12:19 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/07
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.3 is going to be released in september, and is a candidate for
the default ruby version in wheezy. A snapshot is available in
experimental. Now is an ideal time to work on porting issues and get the
fixes integrated upstream. Ruby has a fairly large test suite, which
makes finding
On 07/09/11 at 10:44 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
closing, unreproducible. please have a second look/try before filing these
kind
of bugs for GCC.
Strange. Did you use a parallel build in your own try? Can you provide
your build log?
I suspect a problem with using parallel builds on this
On 29/08/11 at 23:48 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
Ruby 1.9.3 is going to be released in september, and is a candidate for
the default ruby version in wheezy. A snapshot is available in
experimental. Now is an ideal time to work on porting issues and get the
fixes integrated upstream
to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr
a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr
platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Source: gdc-4.6
Version: 0.29.1-4.6.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: gdc-4.4
Version: 1.063-4.4.6-10
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: ppl
Version: 0.11.2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
x86_64-linux-gnu-g++
Source: gnat-4.4
Version: 4.4.6-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: gcc-4.7
Version: 4.7.0-9
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
The full build log is available from:
Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120609 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.7-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130509 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: gcj-4.6
Version: 4.6.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: gcj-4.8
Version: 4.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: gnat-4.6
Version: 4.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: gdc-4.6
Version: 0.29.1-4.6.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: gcj-4.7
Version: 4.7.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20130603-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering
Source: gcc-4.9
Version: 4.9.1-19
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
On 14/07/16 at 13:57 +0200, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Package: libsilly
> Version: 0.1.0-7
> Followup-For: Bug #831152
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
>
> I have solved the bug, that was related to the symbols file. Should I upload
> a new revision adding to 'Build-Depends' gcc-6 explicitely?. Otherwise, I
>
Hi,
I just did an archive rebuild with the gcc-defaults package from
experimental, to use GCC 6.
I filed quite a lot of bugs.
All logs (of failed builds) are available at
https://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2016/07/13/
Due to the large number of problems, there could be a couple of cases
Source: gnat-4.9
Version: 4.9.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gcc-5-cross-ports
Version: 10
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gcc-6-cross-ports
Version: 9
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: gcc-6-cross
Version: 12
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: gcc-5-cross
Version: 24
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: gcc-5
Version: 5.4.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gcc-6
Version: 6.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ../gcc/xgcc -c
Source: gcc-6-cross-ports
Version: 11
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170111 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: gcc-6-cross
Version: 14
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170111 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Hi,
Just for the record: I can still reproduce this failure.
Lucas
Source: gcc-8-cross
Version: 26
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20190325 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in buster on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in buster (in a buster chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on
Source: gcc-9-cross
Version: 19
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200321 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC
Source: gcc-8-cross
Version: 33
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200321 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering directory
Source: gcc-10-cross
Version: 4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200321 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering directory
Source: gdb-bpf
Version: 2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> tar xf
Hi Michael,
On 22/11/20 at 15:32 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> That looks like an ICE, shouldn't that be filed with gfortran?
Usually my logic is: if there's only one similar failure, I file a bug
against the affected package, rather than against the toolchain package
or the
On 20/11/20 at 22:57 +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Control: tag -1 unreproducible
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Lucas Nussbaum, on 2020-11-19 10:35:39 +0100:
> > > /<>/src/lambda.cpp: At global scope:
> > > /<>/src/lambda.cpp:100:1: error: type variant wit
Source: autoconf2.69
Version: 2.69-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/doc'
> Updating ./version.texi
> restore=: &&
Source: gcc-11-cross-ports
Version: 8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash
Source: cvise
Version: 2.4.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: mpclib3
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-kp-nv
Dear maintainer,
This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as
Hi,
Please also see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html , where it
was noticed that the conversion for this package is trivial, and builds
bit-by-bit identical binary packages.
Lucas
Source: gcc-10-cross-ports
Version: 19
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220326 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: nvptx-tools
Version: 0.20230721-1
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to build a source package after a successful build
Source: gcc-12-cross-ports
Version: 2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash
Source: autofdo
Version: 0.19-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: gcc-12-cross
Version: 12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mv
Source: gcc-12-cross-ports
Version: 10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mv
Source: cvise
Version: 2.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: gdb-bpf
Version: 4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -x c++-I.
Source: gcc-12-cross
Version: 7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220813 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gcc-11-cross
Version: 14
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220813 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gcc-11-cross-mipsen
Version: 5+c1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220813 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
Source: gcc-10-cross-mipsen
Version: 3+c5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220813 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
Source: gcc-10-cross
Version: 18
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220813 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gcc-10
Version: 10.4.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ./libtool
Source: gcc-10-cross-ports
Version: 20
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gcc-12
Version: 12.3.0-7
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to build a source package after a successful build
Source: autofdo
Version: 0.19-2.3
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to build a source package after a successful build
Source: elfutils
Version: 0.189-4
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to build a source package after a successful build
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
