Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

2018-06-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 11:44 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: [...] > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Adam D. Barratt > wrote: > > > >  what is the reason why that package is not moving forward? > > > > I assume you're referring to the dpkg upload t

Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

2018-06-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 10:20 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: [...] >  debian-riscv has been repeatedly asking for a single zero-impact > line > to be included in *one* file in *one* dpkg-related package which > would > allow riscv to stop being a NMU architecture and become part of >

Re: Bug#763278: gcc 4.9 wheezy-pu?

2014-10-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 23:01 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Note that the window for the next stable update is closing in about a week, so there isn't a lot of time. Actually, the /point release/ is in about a week. The advertised window for getting updates in to it closes this weekend. Regards,

Bug#724865: gcc-4.8 also affected

2013-10-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 19:48 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: then you do use outdated packages: package: src:gcc-4.8 version: 4.8.1-3 the recent version is 4.8.2-1. 4.8.1-3 is in unstable's Sources index, but as Extra-Source-Only: yes; I guess Johannes's tools need updating to handle

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 14.05.2012 09:10, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.05.2012 21:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 13.05.2012 18:42, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: which ones? are there any reports which are not tagged? I

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 13.05.2012 20:22, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote: This doesn't mean that we shouldn't have gcc-4.7 in wheezy as an alternative, just that it is highly problematic as the default at this point of

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 13.05.2012 18:42, Matthias Klose wrote: On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: which ones? are there any reports which are not tagged? I went through the list of Lucas' new batch and tagged the appropriate ones. There were

Re: Processed: blocks mksh on armel; also 2 pkgs on armhf which is a release arch now

2011-11-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 23:27 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: severity 633479 serious Bug #633479 [gcc-4.6] ICE: gcc-4.6: ICE on armel+armhf with mksh, on armhf with oss4-4.2-build2004-1 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' For reference, armhf is *not* yet a release

Re: Processed: blocks mksh on armel; also 2 pkgs on armhf which is a release arch now

2011-11-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[and now with a CC to the bug *sigh*] On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 23:27 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 633479 serious Bug #633479 [gcc-4.6] ICE: gcc-4.6: ICE on armel+armhf with mksh, on armhf with oss4-4.2-build2004-1

Bug#649307: gnat-4.6: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 (gengtype: Internal error: abort in get_output_file_with_visibility, at gengtype.c:1998)

2011-11-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 15:29 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: On 11/19/2011 11:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 23:32:48 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote: retitle 649307 FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64: gengtype: Internal error: abort in get_output_file_with_visibility, at

Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
severity 633754 important thanks On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:30:17 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Source: gcj-4.6 Version: 4.6.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Building (bootstrapping) gcj-4.6 fails after 3/4 days at: [...] (gcj-4.6 was never built on m68k before,

Bug#631817: libgcc1: missing link libgccc_s.so - libgcc_s.so.1

2011-06-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 17:07 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: Further research indicates that the version of gcc-4.6 currently in testing is not yet multiarch-aware; the first version with multiarch was 4.6.0-12; the latest version is 4.6.0-14. It should have migrated to testing five days

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-04-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 02:34 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the next two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the default compiler for almost any other distribution, so there shouldn't be many

Bug#622095: gccgo: uninstallable on armel

2011-04-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Package: gccgo Version: 4:4.6.0-3 Severity: serious Hi, gccgo is uninstallable on armel as it depends on gccgo-4.6, which is only built on amd64 and i386. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?

2011-02-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 04:48 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:39:39PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Have any of the reverse-dependencies been test-built against the new version? Does the move to 5.0.1 imply any source changes being required for reverse-dependencies

Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?

2011-02-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 22:15 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: On 24.02.2011 21:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] Matthias also responded requesting: I see that both the runtime library and the -dev packages have different package names. But to be able to still use gmp3

Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?

2011-02-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 12:39 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Now that squeeze is out, I'd like to move from GMP 4 to GMP 5. The latter was released upstream about a year ago and the gmp lists aren't buzzing with outrageous bugs, so it appears stable enough. Looking at the package names of the

Bug#589389: FTBFS on ia64

2010-08-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
clone 589398 -1 reassign -1 src:genius found -1 1.0.9-1 thanks Hi, On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 18:23 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Short summary: genius FTBFS on ia64 (and only there) with this problem: cd ../lib ../src/genius --maxerrors=0 --compile loader.gel temp.cgel mv -f

Bug#589337: FTBFS on mips and sparc

2010-08-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 09:23 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: This is a bug in gcj, not in db4.8. It appears to now affect *all* architectures, it just only manifested on sparc and mips because db4.8 was later to build there and got caught by the introduction of this bug. Specifically, this does

Bug#456264: retitle 456264 to gcj: non-free man page included ..., user [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...

2008-02-11 Thread Adam D . Barratt
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.15 # Sorry... retitle 456264 gcj: non-free man page included retitle 465264 [debuild] --lintian-opts doesn't work user [EMAIL PROTECTED] usertags 465264 debuild -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#412104: Man page for gcc missing on Etch

2007-02-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:05 -0500, Bob Kline wrote: Package: gcc-4.1 Installing gcc on Etch does not provide a man page. I've never seen a system (including previous versions of Debian) where gcc didn't come with a man page. You want gcc-doc, which is in contrib, and will install the

Re: hello,what is the gcc problem? etch gcc 4.1 no stdio.h?

2006-10-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 05:58 -0400, lantian ai wrote: grandi:~# cat hello.c #include stdio.h int main() { printf(hello world\n); } grandi:~# gcc -o hello hello.c hello.c:1:19: error: stdio.h: No such file or directory hello.c: In function 'main': hello.c:4: warning:

Bug#390694: [arm] Internal consistency failure while building OpenSER 1.1.0-3

2006-10-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 18:52 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Julien BLACHE writes: Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-13 Severity: important Hi, gcc-4.1 bails out with an error while build OpenSER 1.1.0-3 on arm, see

Bug#389713: cpp-3.3: gcc package dependency problem

2006-09-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:46 AM, Klemens Kasemaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: cpp-3.3 Version: gcc-3.3-base Erm... that's not a version number of the package cpp-3.3. Severity: important Cannot install gcc because of dependency problem: cpp-3.3: Depends: gcc-3.3-base

Re: g++ insanity??????

2005-12-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Friday, December 02, 2005 12:00 PM, Michael Blansfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am trying to install the g++-3.3 compiler on my linux box. But I need to install all the supporting libraries, which I do fine until I get to libstdc++5-3.3-dev which requires g++! What is