Bug#1054272: gcc-13: Regression in SH backend results in binutils FTBFS

.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=binutils=sh4=2.41-6=1697044502=0 > [2] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=e2fsprogs=sh4=1.47.0-2%2Bb1=1697478803=0 > [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111892 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `'

Bug#1050893: gcc-13: Please disable Ada, D, Go and M2 as well as GDB support on loong64

. - Please disable Ada, D, Go and M2 for loong64 in debian/rules.def. - Please add "!loong64" for gdb in debian/control.m4 The attached patch implements these changes. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0

Bug#1036158: gcc-13: Please raise baseline for alpha to EV56

Hi Michael! On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 20:25 +1200, Michael Cree wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 09:38:56AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > After a long discussion on IRC and the mailing list, we have agreed to > > raise the > > baseline for the alpha architectu

Bug#1036158: gcc-13: Please raise baseline for alpha to EV56

=ev56" or "--with-arch=ev56". Thanks, Adrian > [1] > https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/glibc/-/commit/7af7b56d5f5fef7a4f3c011b36774e4556563d3d > [2] > https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/glibc/-/commit/4d57b6af3efd1d6af277b2eb67fe9ee500e7ae68 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian G

Bug#1028195: gcc-12: Please drop build dependency on gdc-12 on unsupported D targets

. Adrian > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026201 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#1027099: gccrs-13: Broken symlink /usr/bin/gccrs-13

Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#1026201: gcc-13: Please drop build dependency on gdc-12 on unsupported D targets

ot=sid -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#1009026: gcc-12: Please re-enable JIT on m68k

-enable JIT for m68k for the next gcc-12 upload? Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#1006363: gcc-12: Patch alpha-ieee.diff no longer applies due to changed filename

) Changing "alpha.c" to "alpha.cc" in the patch fixes the problem. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#1004659: gcc-11: Please include patch to default 32-bit mode to V8+ on sparc64

, Adrian > [1] > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=23987912ddb4207de0714d81237f93f613557d1f > [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104189 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berli

Bug#1003350: hsail-tools: Bogus endianness error message in debian/rules

[1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hsail-tools=s390x=0%7E20180830-1=1578612130=0 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#995223: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Matthias Klose ) (Bug#995223: fixed in libffi 3.4.2-3)

Hi Matthias! On 10/11/21 15:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > This did not fix the bug, unfortunately. libffi is still being built with > "-mcpu=power8" on ppc64, see the full build log in [1]. > > We didn't need --enable-portable before, so this isn't the issue but

Bug#995223: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Matthias Klose ) (Bug#995223: fixed in libffi 3.4.2-3)

sion which is not compatible with libffi [2]. Adrian > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libffi=ppc64=3.4.2-3=1633957534=0 > [2] https://github.com/libffi/libffi/issues/662 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universi

Bug#995916: std::stoi, std::stol, std::stoul, ... broken on sh4

Hi Mattias! On 10/8/21 11:21, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I will try to build cmake with gcc-11 and see if that makes any difference. Building with gcc-11 fixes the problem and cmake builds fine. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.

Bug#995916: std::stoi, std::stol, std::stoul, ... broken on sh4

have seen this issue before and didn't understand what the problem was. At least I do now. I will try to build cmake with gcc-11 and see if that makes any difference. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin -

Bug#995223: libffi: SIGILL on powerpc and ppc64 systems since libffi8

Hello! On 9/29/21 00:38, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > There is actually a baseline violation on i386 as "-march=amdfam10" is > passed to the compiler, see the build log in [1], for example. Comparing the build logs, it seems that this an issue with the newer ver

Bug#995223: libffi: SIGILL on powerpc and ppc64 systems since libffi8

Hi! On 9/28/21 22:40, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > We should therefore pass "--enable-portable-binary" in debian/rules. There is actually a baseline violation on i386 as "-march=amdfam10" is passed to the compiler, see the build log in [1], for example.

Bug#995223: libffi: SIGILL on powerpc and ppc64 systems since libffi8

libffi/libffi/blob/master/m4/ax_gcc_archflag.m4#L209 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#995223: libffi: SIGILL on powerpc and ppc64 systems since libffi8

independently verified that. It might be that libffi performs a runtime detection during build which causes the library to be built with a higher baseline on the POWER8 buildds. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet

Bug#978761: gcc-11: Please temporarily disable Ada on m68k

disable Ada in gcc-11 on m68k until the issue has been fixed upstream? Thanks, Adrian > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de

Bug#977598: gcc-11: Please disable the Go compiler on ia64

report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. Could you therefore disable Go on ia64 for the time being in both gcc-11 and -snapshot? Thanks, Adrian > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-11=ia64=11-20201208-

Bug#971547: gcc-10: gm2 should be disabled for cross-builds in debian/rules.defs

> On Oct 2, 2020, at 1:30 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 10/2/20 1:26 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >>>> On Oct 2, 2020, at 1:18 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> both gcc-10-cross and gcc-10-cross-ports are building ok. Not sure what you >>&

Bug#971547: gcc-10: gm2 should be disabled for cross-builds in debian/rules.defs

> On Oct 2, 2020, at 1:18 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > both gcc-10-cross and gcc-10-cross-ports are building ok. Not sure what you > are > trying to do here. Cross-building a native compiler using “sbuild —host=$ARCH”. That failed when linking gm2. Adrian

Bug#971551: gcc-10: Please enable gnat on m68k as it works now

to remove that as well. Adrian > [1] > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=9aa357c75358a51f038e50f7c8d9207b58c157e0 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A7

Bug#971547: gcc-10: gm2 should be disabled for cross-builds in debian/rules.defs

_no_cross := no Since cross-builing failed for me with gm2 enabled, I assume it's best to remove the line "m2_no_cross := no" from debian/rules.defs to unbreak cross-builds of src:gcc-10. Thanks, Adrian > [1] https://sources.debian.org/src/gcc-10/10.2.0-13/debian/rules.defs/#L1247 -- .

Bug#969221: gcc-10: Please disable Go backend on sh4

the issue has been resolved? It's most likely a bug in glibc and not gcc itself but prevents the Go backend from being built. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de

Bug#951496: libffi: libffi 3.3 breaks OpenJDK Zero on powerpc

Control: tags -1 +patch Hi! On 2/17/20 2:08 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Once the issue has been fixed and this bug is closed, I will mark the package > for > building again on powerpc. Upstream has fixed the problem now [1], attaching the patch. I have not actually t

Bug#951496: libffi: libffi 3.3 breaks OpenJDK Zero on powerpc

to "not-for-us" until the issue has been fixed upstream. Once the issue has been fixed and this bug is closed, I will mark the package for building again on powerpc. Thanks, Adrian > [1] https://github.com/libffi/libffi/issues/536 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Deb

Bug#947500: Missing -latomic on mipsel & armel only?

gt; This is not a bug. You might want to link that unconditionally, however I'd > prefer if this would be an upstream patch, only linking when needed. It's actually bug [1] but it has been unresolved for years now. Adrian > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81358 -- .''`.

Bug#948317: gcc-10: Please disable gm2 on ia64

le gm2 on ia64 once you update to gm2 version with the patch? Let's see first though whether gcc-10 builds fine with gm2 disabled. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.

Bug#948317: gcc-10: Please disable gm2 on ia64

s a lot of sense. Thanks for catching this. I guess, I'll file a bug report upstream then. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#948317: gcc-10: Please disable gm2 on ia64

ich achieves that. > > I can do this. OK. Thank you. Adrian > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-10=ia64=10-20200104-1=1578159251=0 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#948317: gcc-10: Please disable gm2 on ia64

, although I have not run through the whole testsuite yet to confirm everything is okay. But in any case, disabling gm2 on ia64 fixes the build error. Could you add ia64 to m2_no_archs in debian/rules.defs? Attaching a patch which achieves that. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Bug#946792: Acknowledgement (gcc-9: Buffer overflow bug introduced by gcc-search-prefixed-as-ld.diff)

Control: tags -1 +patch Attaching debdiff which incorporates the changes :). Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5

Bug#946792: Acknowledgement (gcc-9: Buffer overflow bug introduced by gcc-search-prefixed-as-ld.diff)

ext+0x1c): undefined reference to `main' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status root@tirpitz:~> Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 295

Bug#946792: gcc-9: Buffer overflow bug introduced by gcc-search-prefixed-as-ld.diff

gt; https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux=sh4=5.3.15-1=1575738446=0 > [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92946 > [3] > https://sources.debian.org/src/gcc-9/9.2.1-21/debian/patches/gcc-search-prefixed-as-ld.diff/ -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian

Bug#929966: g++-8: ICE (SIGILL in collect2) building musescore-snapshot on riscv64

On 6/5/19 7:49 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Dear porters, could you please… Why not do it yourself? You can just compile the source using qemu-user, building with sbuild and --purge=successful. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.

Re: stop building cross compilers for powerpcspe

> On Feb 8, 2019, at 3:58 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> On 08.02.19 12:11, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >>> On 2/8/19 12:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> Upstream GCC has removed the powerpcspe support in GCC 9, and I'd like to >>> stop >

Re: stop building cross compilers for powerpcspe

On 2/8/19 12:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Upstream GCC has removed the powerpcspe support in GCC 9, and I'd like to stop > building the powerpcspe cross compilers for sid/buster. Can we wait until gcc-9 is the default compiler? Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Gl

Bug#916591: gcc-8: Please add patch to disable broken selective scheduling on ia64

.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85412 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 diff -Nru old/gcc-8-8.2.0/debian/patches/ia64-disa

Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

nd IBM Z, I fear that Debian would more and more be turned into a mere development project for Ubuntu and other derivatives rather than being an operating system of its own. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Univer

Bug#912649: gcc-8: Please disable gnat on powerpcspe temporarily

ust be disabled and gcc-8 builds fine which I just did for a manual build. Please disable gnat on powerpcspe for the time being until we have resolved the linker issues. Thanks, Adrian > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-8=powerpcspe=8.2.0-9=1540969207=0 -- .''`.

Re: armel/armhf arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

should watch out for hardware with ARM Cortex Cores. Alternatively, X-Gene 1. ThunderX, ThunderX2 and Centriq are definitely not supported. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `

Re: GCC and binutils updates for buster

4, gcc seems well enough maintained that bugs get fixed in a reasonable amount of time. The powerpcspe is currently being reworked, the SH backend is still maintained by at least one upstream developer. The only backend I am worried about is the m68k backend since it still needs to be ported to CC1. Adria

Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

> On Jun 29, 2018, at 9:50 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:04:26PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: >> I see armel is already not a candidate for buster [0]. >> So it seems we can discuss armhf, but no armel at all. >> I don't agree with this idea. >> And I think we

Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj

continue to do that once the move of powerpc to ports has been completed). I think that building on arm64 after fixing the bug in question is the way to move forward. I'm surprised the bug itself hasn't been fixed yet, doesn't speak for ARM. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian De

Bug#888253: mpfr4: Please reduce optimization level on powerpcspe

will file an upstream gcc bug and also check whether we still need -O0 on m68k. Adrian > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mpfr4=powerpcspe=4.0.0-5=1516751176=0 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitae

Bug#878338: gcc-defaults FTBFS with debhelper 10.9

oesn't make it seem that debhelper is working as expected, is it? At least there should be a comprehensible error message. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2

Bug#883850: gcc-7-cross-ports: Please add support for ia64 to gcc-cross-ports

On 01/02/2018 11:12 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: I couldn't find any obvious thing missing, so I'll let this as a homework for anyone reading this bug report. Attaching my versions of rules, packages.common and packages.invalid. Ok, turns out replacing "Priority: extra" with

Bug#886103: gcc-8: Please disable gccgo on m68k

it can be used and I want to keep it enabled as long as it doesn't break the gcc-7 build so I can easily install gccgo-7 for debugging purposes. Thanks, Adrian > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-8=m68k=8-20171223-1=1514231538=0 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Gl

Bug#885937: gcc-7: Please add patch to strip -z,defs from linker options for internal libunwind

h. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 diff -Nru old/gcc-7-7.2.0/debian/patches/t-libunwind-elf-Wl-z-defs.diff

Bug#885428: gcc-6: Please add support for building internal libunwind

Hello! On 12/27/2017 02:09 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > With the patch applied, rebuilding src:gcc-6 provides a gcc-6-source > package which can be used successully to build the package > cross-toolchain-base-ports with the ia64 target enabled which in > turn will allow

Bug#885931: gcc-7: Please modify gcc-7 to use internal libunwind for ia64 cross-builds

modifications which have been verified to work in rebootstrap. A second patch by James Clarke is necessary to modify some linker flags for building the internal libunwind. I will file a second bug report for that. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org

Bug#885428: gcc-6: Please add support for building internal libunwind

ge which can be used successully to build the package cross-toolchain-base-ports with the ia64 target enabled which in turn will allow us to enable ia64 in gcc-7-cross-ports (after this patch has been added to src:gcc-7 as well). Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debi

Bug#883850: gcc-7-cross-ports: Please add support for ia64 to gcc-cross-ports

ble Depends: linux-libc-dev-ia64-cross but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. apt-get failed. E: Package installation failed Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.

Bug#882174: gcc-7: Raising the armel port baseline to armv5te

On 11/19/2017 10:16 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 11/19/2017 10:06 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: As announced in https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2017/11/msg00045.html this patch raises the armel baseline for buster from armv4t to armv5te. And I still disagree with this change and don't

Bug#883794: gcc-7: Please enable gccgo on m68k

On 12/08/2017 10:29 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> So, please remove m68k from "go_no_cpus" in debian/rules.defs. > > what about gcc-8? I will start a test build now and let you know. Should be done by the evening/tomorrow. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz :

Bug#883794: gcc-7: Please enable gccgo on m68k

in debian/rules.defs. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#883433: gcc-7: Please include patch to implement __builtin_trap() on SH

actually tested the patch with Debian's gcc-7 package. Thanks, Adrian > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70216 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 6

Bug#882174: gcc-7: Raising the armel port baseline to armv5te

Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#871034: gcc-7: Please pass --program-prefix=$(cmd_prefix) for cross-build-native builds

prefix) endif Attaching a patch as well. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 --- debian/rules2~ 2017-08

Bug#870375: gcc-7: Native gdc cross-builds fail

architectures for cross-native builds. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 --- debian/rules.defs.orig 2017-08-01 15:35

Bug#869820: gcc-7-cross-ports: Please build gnat-7 cross-compiler for m68k

Hi! On 07/26/2017 08:32 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Now that #862927 has been resolved, please remember to build the gnat-7 > cross-compiler for m68k in the next upload. It's then easier to cross-build > a native compiler and continue working on the gnat-7 issu

Bug#862927: gnat (GCC 7) fails to build on m68k

Control: reopen -1 On 07/17/2017 10:55 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 06:00:04PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> I had a go at this and came up with the attached patch which >> fixes the problem for me. With the patch applied, I can

Bug#869820: gcc-7-cross-ports: Please build gnat-7 cross-compiler for m68k

with the native compiler [1]. Adrian > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81495 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#862927: gnat (GCC 7) fails to build on m68k

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 06:00:04PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I had a go at this and came up with the attached patch which > fixes the problem for me. With the patch applied, I can build > a gnat cross-compiler for m68k. The patch has already been merged upstream, both on

Bug#868365: gcc-7: Please enable gnat-7 on m68k

Hi! On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 12:03:13AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > After fixing gnat in gcc-7 with the small patch provided in > #862927 [1], I have successfully bootstrapped gnat-7 for > m68k and uploaded the packages to unstable so that gnat-7 > can be used as a buil

Bug#868365: gcc-7: Please enable gnat-7 on m68k

] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862927 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#862927: gnat (GCC 7) fails to build on m68k

-- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 --- a/src/gcc/ada/system-linux-m68k.ads.orig 2016-12-05 12:27:55.0 +0100 +++ b/src/gcc

Bug#868186: gcc-7: powerpcspe missing for cross-builds in d/control and d/rules.conf

mapping for the command prefix (GNU triplet) is missing in debian/rules.conf [2]. Cheers, Adrian > [1] https://sources.debian.net/src/gcc-7/7.1.0-9/debian/control/#L23 > [2] http://sources.debian.net/src/gcc-7/7.1.0-9/debian/rules.conf/#L430 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' :

Bug#865059: gcc-7: Please temporarily build with --disable-libcilkrts on sparc64

Control: clone -1 Control: reassign gcc-snapshot On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 01:01:19AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > It turned out that the offending test is cilkplus and until the kernel > has been fixed, please make sure to build gcc-7 on sparc* with cilk > disabled, e.g. b

Bug#865059: gcc-7: Please temporarily build with --disable-libcilkrts on sparc64

ian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#861945: gcc-6: Please backport fix for PR/60818 from the trunk

to the gcc-6 trunk yet. Would it be possible to include the patch to the gcc-6 package? I'm attaching the patch taken from the trunk, already in the proper format to be added to the gcc-6 package. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org

Re: Lack of hardening=+pie gives unwanted, unsilenceable noisy compiler output

ian.org/g/gcc-6/news/20170316T134920Z.html -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#856224: gcc-6: Please enable PIE on ppc64

also enable it for ppc64 to mitigate this problem. Thanks, Adrian > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cmake=ppc64=3.7.2-1=1488126538=0 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-ber

Bug#855197: gcc-6: Please use --with-cpu on sparc without biarch

On 02/15/2017 11:55 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > This is because we're using --with-cpu-32=ultrasparc for all > sparc configurations although we have to use --with-cpu=ultrasparc > instead. ... when using nobiarch, I meant. nobiarch = --with-cpu=ultrasparc biarch = --wi

Bug#855197: gcc-6: Please use --with-cpu on sparc without biarch

CBFS issue for sparc-nobiarch. Thanks, Adrian > [1] > https://jenkins.debian.net/view/rebootstrap/job/rebootstrap_sparc_gcc6_nobiarch/ -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG

Bug#853906: gcc-7: Please disable gccgo on m68k for gcc-7 (but not gcc-6)

it was written in C for gcc-6. I would therefore like to ask to disable gccgo in gcc-7 on m68k for the time being until we have fully resolved the issues with gccgo-7 but please let gccgo-6 enabled for gcc-6. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub

Bug#853794: gcc-defaults-ports: Missing packages for powerpcspe

On 02/01/2017 01:44 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > you can't build that on ppc64el, the dependencies are not built there. Good catch, thank you! Attaching updated patch. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Ber

Bug#853794: gcc-defaults-ports: Missing packages for powerpcspe

the changes from the attached patch, running debian/rules control, I was able to rebuild gcc-defaults-ports with the default gcc packages for powerpcspe enabled. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin

Bug#853223: gcc-6: Please update gccgo-m68k.diff with additional changes

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281#c4 > [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956

Bug#852091: Acknowledgement (gcc-6: Binaries compiled with gccgo on m68k crash (unaligned access))

Forgot to link the upstream patch set in the footnote, sorry: > https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/35478/ -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2

Bug#852091: gcc-6: Binaries compiled with gccgo on m68k crash (unaligned access)

produces working binaries. Of course, if upstream decides to backport this patch to gcc-6, it won't be necessary to carry this patch in gcc-6. But in case that doesn't happen, here's a patch verified to be working to be applied instantly. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Bug#851869: gcc-6: Please support multiarch paths for sh3

s. This is achieved by applying the attached patch. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 diff -Nru old/gcc-6-

Bug#850749: gcc-6: Please enable gccgo on m68k

all it and work on fixing the issues. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#850749: gcc-6: Please enable gccgo on m68k

ts for m68k. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 --- debian/rules.defs.old 2017-01-09 22:07:01.00

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/22/2016 12:36 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Could you please remove the ada-m68k.diff patch from the gcc-7 > source package now. It's existence still breaks the build, it has > been merged upstream now as already discussed. > > Ada is currently is disabled on gcc-6 a

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

Hi Matthias! On 12/05/2016 12:42 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> gcc upstream just merged the patch after I had to modify it [1]. >> >> >>> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=243247 > > Ah, there is no gcc-7 branch yet. So we actually

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/04/2016 06:33 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > OK, attaching the updated patch which applies cleanly. gcc upstream just merged the patch after I had to modify it [1]. Attaching the updated version. Thanks, Adrian > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/05/2016 12:32 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/04/2016 06:33 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> OK, attaching the updated patch which applies cleanly. > > gcc upstream just merged the patch after I had to modify it [1]. > > >> [1] https://g

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/04/2016 06:26 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Dez 04 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> > wrote: > >> So I assume we can strip the patch from the changes in s-memory.adb and >> s-memory.ads? > > Yes. OK, attaching the up

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/04/2016 04:43 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > However, I'm by no means an Ada expert to be able to tell whether we still > need > Ada.Unchecked_Conversion anymore. I have glimpsed over PR48835 and I'm not > sure > whether this confirms this in any way. Ah, I assume y

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/04/2016 02:38 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Dez 04 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> > wrote: > >> @Andreas: Are you sure the patch is no longer necessary? > > I didn't say that. Ok, this was a misunderstandin

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/04/2016 01:11 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Dropping ada-m68k.diff fixes this particular issue for me. > m68k-revert-pr45144.patch > is currently not applied because we have disabled Ada on m68k by adding it to > ada_no_cpus in debian/rules.defs because of #814221 [1]

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

and treat this particular patch as a separate issue. Adrian > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814221 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

.ads > > According to PR48835, this is no longer necessary. Ah, thanks for letting us know. I was already suspecting that, but I didn't have the time yet to verify it. @Matthias: Do you agree that we can drop this particular patch then? Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaub

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-7=m68k=7-20161201-1=1480796787 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#845461: gcc-6: Please build with --with-cpu=ultrasparc on sparc

> On Nov 27, 2016, at 2:14 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > The patches to configure --with-cpu-32= and --with-cpu-64= are availabe in GCC > 6, so we should use them and ensure that the defaults for the sparc/64 and > sparc64, and sparc and sparc64/32 targets match. Just forcing

Bug#845461: gcc-6: Please build with --with-cpu=ultrasparc on sparc

> On Nov 24, 2016, at 7:07 PM, Jose E. Marchesi > wrote: > > Ah, I thought you said that GCC 6 was not building anymore with > --mcpu=ultrasparc due to some bug. You mean that the debian package is > no longer using that option. Yes, but only the Debian package on

Bug#845461: gcc-6: Please build with --with-cpu=ultrasparc on sparc

suggested patch to do that is correct. I think that always passing --with-cpu=ultrasparc on sparc (32-bit) will always make sure the compiler is configured to generate v8+ in 32-bit and v9 code in 64-bit mode. Is that correct? Adrian > [1] https://jenkins.debian.net/view/rebootstrap/ -- .''`. J

  1   2   >