On 06/27/2018 10:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> As part of the interim architecture qualification for buster, we request
> that DSA, the security team and the toolchain maintainers review and
> update their list of known concerns for buster release architectures.
>
Everyone, please
VM
>>support uncertain. (DSA)
>>- Source: [DSA Sprint report]
>>
>> [DSA Sprint report]:
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2018/02/msg4.html
>
> In this report Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> In short, the hardware (development boards) we're c
wrote:
>Control: severity -1 serious
>
>On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 09:53:21PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 07:39:27PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > Control: severity -1 normal
>> > Control: tag -1 m
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 14:11:49 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: libmpfr6
> Version: 4.0.0-5
> Severity: serious
>
> Mixing libmpfr4 and libmpfr6 doesn't work well:
>
> flint-arb FTBFS with:
> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libmpfr.so.4, needed
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 21:33:56 +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: severity -1 serious
>
> breaking packages is serious enough to me
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meson/+bug/1698463
>
> is an example of affected package.
>
> Raising the severity accordingly
>
You
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 13:13:35 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: gcc-4.9-base
Version: 4.9.1-19
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
please sync the Breaks between gcc-4.8-base and gcc-4.9-base s.t. both
include Breaks: gcc-4.7-base (
Control: severity -1 normal
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 15:49:49 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
On 2013-01-17 16:10, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
how are the chances of getting this fix in sid and wheezy?
I just verified that this really fixes the upgrade
Source: gdc-4.6
Version: 0.29.1-4.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
From the kbsd-i386 build log:
/build/buildd-gdc-4.6_0.29.1-4.6.3-1-kfreebsd-i386-8zg7gt/gdc-4.6-0.29.1-4.6.3/build/./gcc/gdc
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May.
So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need
to NMU?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Source: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.118
Severity: serious
gcc-defaults shouldn't migrate to wheezy until there's an agreement
between the gcc maintainers and release team about the 4.7 situation.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the bug reports a month ago.
Seeing the number of new bug reports that keep popping up I still think
the switch should be reverted. It was bad enough with all the month old
bugs still
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the bug
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:42:21 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I am only aware of these usertags:
debian...@lists.debian.org / qa-ftbfs-20120508
do you known about a new rebuild?
No, I've seen bugs being filed from watching -bugs-rc.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 18:55:49 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
strigi was fixed, the gnome-commander and hugin builds were both tried on
brahms (and did succeed on other architectures).
Other architectures didn't switch to 4.7.
What's worse is that at least for the last two, there were no
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 18:55:49 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
mbiebl awesome, libchamplain ftbfs with an ICE in gcc-4.7
mbiebl yeah for switching the default compiler
KiBi doko: It looks like I'm going to take up your offer. Please fix that.
mbiebl doko: you have your first problem of gcc-4.7
Package: libppl-swi
Version: 0.11.2-6
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
Hi,
libppl-swi is marked as Multi-Arch: same, but contains files in
arch-independent paths with arch-specific contents:
[libppl-swi 0.11.2-6]
usr/bin/ppl_pl
Cheers,
Package: libppl0.11-dev
Version: 0.11.2-6
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
Hi,
libppl0.11-dev is marked as Multi-Arch: same, but contains files in
arch-independent paths with arch-specific contents:
[libppl0.11-dev 0.11.2-6]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Apparently the latest gcc-defaults stopped building the gdc package on
the archs listed in $subject, so the ood packages should be removed.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Source: gnat-4.6
Version: 4.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
See the build log at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnat-4.6arch=armelver=4.6.2-2stamp=1321391128
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Source: gnat-4.6
Version: 4.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
See the build log at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnat-4.6arch=kfreebsd-amd64ver=4.6.2-2stamp=1321357341
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 23:32:48 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
retitle 649307 FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64: gengtype: Internal error: abort in
get_output_file_with_visibility, at gengtype.c:1998
reassign 649307 src:gcc-4.6
severity 649307 important
forcemerge 649307 637236
thanks
Julien and
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 23:57:48 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Perl. Nevertheless, if you would have googled for gengtype: Internal
error: abort in get_output_file_with_visibility, at gengtype.c:1998 you
would have found #637236, which you could have used just as well to
block the transition
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 23:43:03 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
doko, you said merging gcc-4.6 4.6.2-4 into gnat-4.6 would fix this
FTBFS but it hasn't. The buildd log does not indicate the exact version
of gcc-4.6 installed on the machine; perhaps I should tighten the
It does, it was
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 15:26:07 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Package: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6.1-1
Severity: normal
Blocks: 633373
gcc-4.6 seems to miscompile libgcrypt11 on armel, causing total
failure of gnutls26.
---
(sid)ametzler@abel:~/GNUTLS$
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 14:08:00 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
I'm wondering. Is the project at large aware that we're not building for
i486, but for i586 ? That even the maintainer doesn't know why for
sure[1] and that no changelog entry documents when or why that happened?
(nothing in
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 16:41:23 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 04/26/2011 09:39 AM, Neil McGovern wrote:
I woudn't be particularly happy with that unless the gcc maintainers ok
it, and I'm still not sure that two days is also an acceptable
timescale.
then please drop mips and mipsel as
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 18:20:09 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: libapron-dev
Version:0.9.10-5
Severity: serious
libapron-dev depends on libppl0.10-dev, which doesn't exist anymore in
unstable, now removed by ftp-master. Please depend on libppl0.11-dev
instead.
Well. Or
Package: gpc
Version: 1.97
Severity: serious
gpc-4.1 has been removed, which makes gpc (and gpc-doc) uninstallable.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 14:20:56 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Not sure, if the release team wants such kind of patches at this
stage. At least the version in unstable didn't yet migrate. I won't
do this update anyway, mostly offline until Feb 13.
No, we're only fixing release critical bugs
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:43:23 +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi Julien,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 595884 + sid
Bug #595884 [ppl] ppl: FTBFS in squeeze: /bin/bash: plld: command not found
Added tag(s) sid.
Would you mind elaborating why you
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-13
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
See e.g.
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=base-installerarch=armelver=1.111stamp=1283683945file=logas=raw
and a few others from arcadelt or antheil.
make[2]: Entering directory
notfixed 591155 0.10.2-7
kthxbye
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 21:00:07 -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
xpdf-utils: Depends: poppler-utils but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages
That's 586620, not a bug in this package, fixing
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 19:33:12 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
Now, to be clear, what nice things would gcc-4.5 bring to our users?
There is a complete list here [0], but those ones are, in my opinion,
very nice:
- The new link time optimiser.
- Improved C++0x support.
- Plugins support.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 19:12:37 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Personally, I'd be comfortable with gcc-4.5 in Squeeze except for this
part:
- the upload will build several runtime libraries from the 4.5
sources. Regression tests did pass for the runtime libs built
from the 4.5
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 16:00:37 +1000, Robert Ancell wrote:
Package: libffi-dev
Version: 3.0.9-2
Severity: grave
Tags: squeeze
Please don't use distribution tags unless the bug is actually specific
to that branch (as opposed to the package version).
Justification: renders package unusable
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:13:19 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
In both cases it would be nice if you'd tag those bugs (FTBFS with
gcc-4.4 and 4.5) with sid+squeeze, so that they dont show up as RC
bugs for stable, for packages which have the same version in lenny.
Except you don't want the
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 23:22:36 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
We only build the user-docs nowadays, and that actually wouldn't be necessary
if
Debian's build system did what the policy says: There is no need to re-build
the
architecture independent stuff on each and every host, but the
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:00:18 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-14 09:54]:
* Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-13 10:12]:
Still ICE with -O1. Runs ok with -O0.
This is now PR34091.
Upstream writes:
| I view this as a critical
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:06:02 -0600, Julien Cristau wrote:
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.2-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
netgen fails to build on hppa, see build log at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=netgenarch=hppaver=4.4-8stamp=1188566736file=logas=raw
I reproduced the FTBFS
Package: gij-4.2
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ cat debian/gij-hppa
#! /bin/sh
prctl=
case $(prctl --unaligned=) in *signal)
echo 2 $(basename $0): ignore unaligned memory accesses
prctl=prctl --unaligned=default
esac
exec $prctl
2.16.1cvs20050902-1 and libc6.1-dev 2.3.5-5.
Does anyone know of an alpha-related change in the toolchain between
these versions, which could have caused this?
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get a meaningful backtrace with gdb (I
only know that the segfault occurs at program startup).
Thanks,
Julien
-To.
Cheers,
Julien Cristau
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
42 matches
Mail list logo
