--- Comment #17 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 23:05 ---
Subject: Bug 28490
Author: wilson
Date: Fri Sep 15 23:05:40 2006
New Revision: 116983
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116983
Log:
Short term fix for PR 28490.
* config/ia64/ia64.c
--- Comment #10 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 01:49 ---
This is the same bug as PR 28490. I verified that my prototype patch for PR
28490 fixes it.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28490 ***
--
wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #10 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 01:49 ---
This is the same bug as PR 28490. I verified that my prototype patch for PR
28490 fixes it.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28490 ***
--
wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #13 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 01:49 ---
*** Bug 28495 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28490
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Comment #14 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 01:55 ---
Steve Ellcey posted a patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00016.html
I posted a better patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00054.html
This patch has not been tested
--- Comment #14 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 02:10 ---
Subject: Bug 24202
Author: wilson
Date: Fri Nov 4 02:10:19 2005
New Revision: 106472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=106472
Log:
Fix failure with pragma once where buffer is NULL
--- Comment #15 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 02:12 ---
Subject: Bug 24202
Author: wilson
Date: Fri Nov 4 02:12:48 2005
New Revision: 106473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=106473
Log:
Fix pragma once bug where buffer is NULL and buffer_valid
--- Comment #13 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 23:51 ---
I believe the problem originated here:
2003-07-29 Neil Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR preprocessor/11569
PR preprocessor/11649
* Makefile.in (LIBCPP_DEPS): Add HASHTAB_H.
* cppfiles.c
--- Comment #22 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 23:24 ---
Subject: Bug 17356
Author: wilson
Date: Mon Oct 31 23:24:36 2005
New Revision: 106297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=106297
Log:
Rewrite fix for PR 17356, fix for enable checking ada build
--- Comment #23 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 23:25 ---
Fixed for gcc-4.1. Won't fix for gcc-4.0.3.
--
wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 07:19 ---
On mainline, this appears to be fixable with a one line patch.
We are failing in should_stack_file because we have a _cpp_file struct with
buffer=0 and buffer_valid=1. We call read_file which immediately returns
--- Comment #11 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 07:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=10096)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10096action=view)
clear buffer_valid when clearing buffer
Untested patch for mainline which makes the testcase work.
--
wilson
--- Comment #12 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 07:25 ---
The patch should use false instead of 0. These new fangled boolean types keep
messing me up.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
--- Comment #21 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-19 23:10 ---
I done bootstrap tests for the gcc-4.0.x branch. I bootstrapped all default
languages plus ada with and without the patch. There were no regressions.
There was also no failure as reported in the PR, which seemed
--- Comment #19 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-18 00:52 ---
Fixed on mainline, still broken on gcc-4.0.x branch. I've started a builds to
test it. This will take a while.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17356
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Comment #16 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 02:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=10005)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10005action=view)
patch to fix ia64-linux libada build failure
And here's the patch. It is simple enough that it should be safe
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14
19:52 ---
Fixed on mainline, gcc-3.4 branch, and gcc-3.3 branch. Testcase added to
mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08
03:55 ---
David's patch looks correct to me. We only need this on mainline, as the
precursor patch (PR 13158) is only on mainline. I will do a build and test and
then check it in if all goes well
--
Bug 13882 depends on bug 15836, which changed state.
Bug 15836 Summary: ICE in genmodes.c:746 (-fprofile-generate)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15836
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-17
00:14 ---
I just did a successful make profiledbootstrap on the gcc-3.4 branch, so this
must have been the same bug as 16490.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16490 ***
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-10
23:43 ---
I can reproduce the problem with gcc-3_3-branch on powerpc-darwin. I can also
reproduce the problem with current sources using -O -fold-unroll-loops.
The problem is a bad interaction between the old loop
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-10
23:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=5894)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5894action=view)
clear loop_info-initial_value is loop preconditioned
This fixes the problem by disabling doloop when
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-09
23:21 ---
Patch checked in on mainline and 3.4 branch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-29
21:41 ---
This is a known interaction problem with cselib/sched-ebb. I have never seen a
report of it resulting in an ICE or incorrect code. It only results in code
that is scheduled differently, and hence this can
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-29
21:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=5613)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5613action=view)
sched-ebb.c patch to disable use of cselib
I believe this will fix the harmless bootstrap compare failures
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-08
08:11 ---
The situation here is a little obscure. reload_as_needed calls
constrain_operands during reload, to check whether insns emitted for asm reloads
are valid insns. Since this is during reload, we need
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11319
wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11319
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-07
05:35 ---
The bug has been fixed by the alias.c patch. However, there were questions
raised about
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9812
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-07
03:55 ---
I have added the patch to the mainline. I have not added the patch the 3.3
branch because
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11054
wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
30 matches
Mail list logo
