--- Comment #14 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 02:10 ---
Subject: Bug 24202
Author: wilson
Date: Fri Nov 4 02:10:19 2005
New Revision: 106472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=106472
Log:
Fix failure with pragma once where buffer is NULL and
--- Comment #15 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 02:12 ---
Subject: Bug 24202
Author: wilson
Date: Fri Nov 4 02:12:48 2005
New Revision: 106473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=106473
Log:
Fix pragma once bug where buffer is NULL and buffer_valid is
--- Comment #13 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 23:51 ---
I believe the problem originated here:
2003-07-29 Neil Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR preprocessor/11569
PR preprocessor/11649
* Makefile.in (LIBCPP_DEPS): Add HASHTAB_H.
* cppfiles.c:
--- Comment #10 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 07:19 ---
On mainline, this appears to be fixable with a one line patch.
We are failing in should_stack_file because we have a _cpp_file struct with
buffer=0 and buffer_valid=1. We call read_file which immediately returns
--- Comment #11 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 07:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=10096)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10096action=view)
clear buffer_valid when clearing buffer
Untested patch for mainline which makes the testcase work.
--
wilson
--- Comment #12 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 07:25 ---
The patch should use false instead of 0. These new fangled boolean types keep
messing me up.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 06:02
---
I'm marking this as P1, at least until we do some analysis.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.0/4.1 Regression]|[3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression]
|Segfault with #pragma
8 matches
Mail list logo
