--- Comment #17 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 23:05 ---
Subject: Bug 28490
Author: wilson
Date: Fri Sep 15 23:05:40 2006
New Revision: 116983
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116983
Log:
Short term fix for PR 28490.
* config/ia64/ia64.c
--- Comment #16 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-08-28 16:07 ---
Yes, I did some performance measurements with SPEC2000. Allowing any (symbol +
offset) resulted in slightly slower code overall, allowing no (symbol + offset)
resulted in slightly faster code overall. I will be
--- Comment #15 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-27 18:30 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Steve Ellcey posted a patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00016.html
I posted a better patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00054.html
This
--- Comment #13 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 01:49 ---
*** Bug 28495 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28490
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or
--- Comment #14 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 01:55 ---
Steve Ellcey posted a patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00016.html
I posted a better patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00054.html
This patch has not been tested
--- Comment #12 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-02 13:45
---
Created an attachment (id=11996)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11996action=view)
Patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28490
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #11996|Patch |Oops! Wrong bug.
description||
--- Comment #10 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-01 05:51 ---
Why is this a P1 regression? ia-64 is not a primary platform.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-08-02 03:29 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in ia64_expand_move,
at config/ia64/ia64.c:1088
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Why is this a P1 regression? ia-64 is not a primary platform.
True -- but IA64 is
--- Comment #7 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-07-31 11:29 ---
This bug is also present in gcc 4.0 and 4.1 even though my original testcase
didn't expose it there. My new one does:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc-4.0 -c -O ecl-asdf.c
ecl-asdf.c: In function 'LC67traverse':
ecl-asdf.c:81:
--- Comment #8 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-07-31 11:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=11980)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11980action=view)
test case for 4.0, 4.1 and 4.2
Testcase from application ecl.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28490
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 12:20 ---
Reduced testcase from comment #8
typedef union cl_lispunion *cl_object;
union cl_lispunion { cl_object cons; };
typedef union { cl_object data; } cl_symbol_initializer;
extern cl_symbol_initializer cl_symbols[];
12 matches
Mail list logo
