Bug#1032165: gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe
Control: severity -1 important updating the Built-Using tag almost always means, that you build against a new compiler version, also most likely modifying all the target binaries (lib*-cross-*), which are packaged as binary-independent packages. So a binNMU just doesn't make sense for the -cross packages. Efforts to improve the situation should go into getting rid off these packages, however this requires britney support for dependencies on foreign architectures and support of the testing pocket for the so called ports architectures.
Processed: Re: Bug#1032165: gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe
Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 -3 -4 Bug #1032165 [src:gcc-12-cross-ports] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe Bug 1032165 cloned as bugs 1032216-1032218 > reassign -2 gcc-9-cross-ports 25 Bug #1032216 [src:gcc-12-cross-ports] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe Bug reassigned from package 'src:gcc-12-cross-ports' to 'gcc-9-cross-ports'. No longer marked as found in versions gcc-12-cross-ports/12. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1032216 to the same values previously set Bug #1032216 [gcc-9-cross-ports] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe There is no source info for the package 'gcc-9-cross-ports' at version '25' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '25' Marked as found in versions 25. > retitle -2 gcc-9-cross-ports: not binNMU-safe Bug #1032216 [gcc-9-cross-ports] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe Changed Bug title to 'gcc-9-cross-ports: not binNMU-safe' from 'gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe'. > reassign -3 gcc-9-cross 27 Bug #1032217 [src:gcc-12-cross-ports] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe Bug reassigned from package 'src:gcc-12-cross-ports' to 'gcc-9-cross'. No longer marked as found in versions gcc-12-cross-ports/12. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1032217 to the same values previously set Bug #1032217 [gcc-9-cross] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe There is no source info for the package 'gcc-9-cross' at version '27' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '27' Marked as found in versions 27. > retitle -3 gcc-9-cross: not binNMU-safe Bug #1032217 [gcc-9-cross] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe Changed Bug title to 'gcc-9-cross: not binNMU-safe' from 'gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe'. > reassign -4 gcc-10-cross-mipsen 3+c5 Bug #1032218 [src:gcc-12-cross-ports] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe Bug reassigned from package 'src:gcc-12-cross-ports' to 'gcc-10-cross-mipsen'. No longer marked as found in versions gcc-12-cross-ports/12. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1032218 to the same values previously set Bug #1032218 [gcc-10-cross-mipsen] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe There is no source info for the package 'gcc-10-cross-mipsen' at version '3+c5' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '3+c5' Marked as found in versions 3+c5. > retitle -4 gcc-10-cross-mipsen: not binNMU-safe Bug #1032218 [gcc-10-cross-mipsen] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe Changed Bug title to 'gcc-10-cross-mipsen: not binNMU-safe' from 'gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe'. -- 1032165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032165 1032216: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032216 1032217: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032217 1032218: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032218 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: Bug#1032165: gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe
Control: clone -1 -2 -3 -4 Control: reassign -2 gcc-9-cross-ports 25 Control: retitle -2 gcc-9-cross-ports: not binNMU-safe Control: reassign -3 gcc-9-cross 27 Control: retitle -3 gcc-9-cross: not binNMU-safe Control: reassign -4 gcc-10-cross-mipsen 3+c5 Control: retitle -4 gcc-10-cross-mipsen: not binNMU-safe On 2023-02-28 22:18:14 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: clone -1 -2 > Control: reassign -2 gcc-11-cross-mipsen 5+c3 > Control: retitle -2 gcc-11-cross-mipsen: not binNMU-safe > > On 2023-02-28 22:13:59 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Source: gcc-12-cross-ports > > Version: 12 > > Severity: serious > > > > The method to compute the version of the binary packages is not > > binNMU-safe. This can be seen from the latest round of binNMUs to > > rebuild for outdated Built-Using fields. See > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-12-cross-ports=amd64=12%2Bb1=1677602107=0 > > > > As it can be seen from the log, the version computed for the binary > > packages is the same as the one of the build of the initial upload of > > version 12. The binNMU version -- b1 in this case -- is missing. > > gcc-11-cross-mipsen is affected by the same issue. Cloning and > reassigning. … and there are more. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Processed: Re: Bug#1032165: gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe
Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #1032165 [src:gcc-12-cross-ports] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe Bug 1032165 cloned as bug 1032167 > reassign -2 gcc-11-cross-mipsen 5+c3 Bug #1032167 [src:gcc-12-cross-ports] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe Bug reassigned from package 'src:gcc-12-cross-ports' to 'gcc-11-cross-mipsen'. No longer marked as found in versions gcc-12-cross-ports/12. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1032167 to the same values previously set Bug #1032167 [gcc-11-cross-mipsen] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe There is no source info for the package 'gcc-11-cross-mipsen' at version '5+c3' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '5+c3' Marked as found in versions 5+c3. > retitle -2 gcc-11-cross-mipsen: not binNMU-safe Bug #1032167 [gcc-11-cross-mipsen] gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe Changed Bug title to 'gcc-11-cross-mipsen: not binNMU-safe' from 'gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe'. -- 1032165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032165 1032167: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032167 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: Bug#1032165: gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe
Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 gcc-11-cross-mipsen 5+c3 Control: retitle -2 gcc-11-cross-mipsen: not binNMU-safe On 2023-02-28 22:13:59 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Source: gcc-12-cross-ports > Version: 12 > Severity: serious > > The method to compute the version of the binary packages is not > binNMU-safe. This can be seen from the latest round of binNMUs to > rebuild for outdated Built-Using fields. See > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-12-cross-ports=amd64=12%2Bb1=1677602107=0 > > As it can be seen from the log, the version computed for the binary > packages is the same as the one of the build of the initial upload of > version 12. The binNMU version -- b1 in this case -- is missing. gcc-11-cross-mipsen is affected by the same issue. Cloning and reassigning. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1032165: gcc-12-cross-ports: not binNMU safe
Source: gcc-12-cross-ports Version: 12 Severity: serious The method to compute the version of the binary packages is not binNMU-safe. This can be seen from the latest round of binNMUs to rebuild for outdated Built-Using fields. See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-12-cross-ports=amd64=12%2Bb1=1677602107=0 As it can be seen from the log, the version computed for the binary packages is the same as the one of the build of the initial upload of version 12. The binNMU version -- b1 in this case -- is missing. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
