Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number signed types are undefined on overflow (fwd)

Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Petr Salinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-14 13:05]: Does help to compile it with -fwrapv ? No. Are you sure? It does for me. -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number signed types are undefined on overflow (fwd)

reassign 362414 libsndfile retitle 362414 lossy_comp_test fails because signed types are undefined on overflow tags 362414 + patch thanks * Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-18 18:05]: * Petr Salinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-14 13:05]: Does help to compile it with -fwrapv ? No.

Processed: Re: Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number signed types are undefined on overflow (fwd)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 362414 libsndfile Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number Bug reassigned from package `gcc-snapshot' to `libsndfile'. retitle 362414 lossy_comp_test fails because signed types are undefined on overflow Bug#362414: abs() returns a

Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number signed types are undefined on overflow (fwd)

* Martin Michlmayr: Does help to compile it with -fwrapv ? No. Then it's a real bug in -fwrapv support, I guess. Without -fwrapv, all bets are off AFAICS because the example code results in signed integer overflow. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number signed types are undefined on overflow (fwd)

* Petr Salinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-14 13:05]: Does help to change definition of sum_abs from int to unsigned int ? Yes. Does help to compile it with -fwrapv ? No. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of