Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/22/2016 12:36 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Could you please remove the ada-m68k.diff patch from the gcc-7 > source package now. It's existence still breaks the build, it has > been merged upstream now as already discussed. > > Ada is currently is disabled on gcc-6 and gcc-7

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

Hi Matthias! On 12/05/2016 12:42 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> gcc upstream just merged the patch after I had to modify it [1]. >> >> >>> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=243247 > > Ah, there is no gcc-7 branch yet. So we actually won't need this > patch but just an

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/04/2016 06:33 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > OK, attaching the updated patch which applies cleanly. gcc upstream just merged the patch after I had to modify it [1]. Attaching the updated version. Thanks, Adrian > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=243247 --

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/05/2016 12:32 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/04/2016 06:33 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> OK, attaching the updated patch which applies cleanly. > > gcc upstream just merged the patch after I had to modify it [1]. > > >> [1]

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/04/2016 06:26 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Dez 04 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > wrote: > >> So I assume we can strip the patch from the changes in s-memory.adb and >> s-memory.ads? > > Yes. OK, attaching the updated patch which applies cleanly.

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On Dez 04 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > So I assume we can strip the patch from the changes in s-memory.adb and > s-memory.ads? Yes. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/04/2016 04:43 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > However, I'm by no means an Ada expert to be able to tell whether we still > need > Ada.Unchecked_Conversion anymore. I have glimpsed over PR48835 and I'm not > sure > whether this confirms this in any way. Ah, I assume you were talking

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/04/2016 02:38 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Dez 04 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > wrote: > >> @Andreas: Are you sure the patch is no longer necessary? > > I didn't say that. Ok, this was a misunderstanding then as you meant earlier that "this" is no

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On Dez 04 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > @Andreas: Are you sure the patch is no longer necessary? I didn't say that. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/04/2016 01:11 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Dropping ada-m68k.diff fixes this particular issue for me. > m68k-revert-pr45144.patch > is currently not applied because we have disabled Ada on m68k by adding it to > ada_no_cpus in debian/rules.defs because of #814221 [1]. Hmm, so I

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

Hi Matthias! On 12/03/2016 11:56 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Adrian, I would appreciate if you could look at a package first before calling > for actions, and then ask a complete question. We also have the > m68k-revert-pr45144 patch in the build which apparently needs some decision. Dropping

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On Dez 03 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > patching file src/gcc/ada/s-memory.adb > Hunk #1 FAILED at 47. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 113 (offset 13 lines). > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file src/gcc/ada/s-memory.adb > patching file

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

On 12/03/2016 10:02 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> patching file src/gcc/ada/s-memory.adb >> Hunk #1 FAILED at 47. >> Hunk #2 succeeded at 113 (offset 13 lines). >> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file src/gcc/ada/s-memory.adb >> patching file src/gcc/ada/s-memory.ads > > According to

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

Control: tags -1 moreinfo help sure, please update it. It can't be applied unconditionally because it breaks the build on other architectures. On 03.12.2016 21:30, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Source: gcc-7 > Version: 7-20161201-1 > Severity: normal > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org >

Processed: Re: Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo help Bug #846872 [src:gcc-7] gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch Added tag(s) moreinfo and help. -- 846872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846872 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#846872: gcc-7: FTBFS on m68k - fails to apply ada-m68k.diff patch

Source: gcc-7 Version: 7-20161201-1 Severity: normal User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: m68k Hi! gcc-7 currently fails to build from source because one of the patches shipped in the source package don't apply properly [1]: Applying patch ada-m68k.diff patching file