On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:26:53PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Building such i386 chroots now would require heavy use of snaphots.debian.org,
> and would be much less convenient.
>
> > Also there are amd64 ->
> > i386 cross compilers for the newer versions. Is it really necessary to
> > keep
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:02:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 8/13/20 11:49 AM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:25:21AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> On 8/12/20 11:16 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
I have a similar usecase like Bill: I have lots of gcc-*-multilib
packages installed (from ancient to to experimental) for doing
compilation tests for $software with many different compiler versions.
nearly all lib(x)32XYZ packages built by gcc-N (N < 9? 8?) depend on
lib(x)32gcc1
In the end I wo
On 8/13/20 11:49 AM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:25:21AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 8/12/20 11:16 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 21/05/2020 14.05, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 5/20/20 10:32 PM,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:25:21AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 8/12/20 11:16 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> On 21/05/2020 14.05, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>> On 5/20/20 10:32 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> With the trans
On 8/12/20 11:16 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On 21/05/2020 14.05, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> On 5/20/20 10:32 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
With the transitional packages gone in 10.1.0-2, please add versioned
(epoched!) pr
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 21/05/2020 14.05, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 5/20/20 10:32 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> With the transitional packages gone in 10.1.0-2, please add versioned
> >> (epoched!) provides on the old names (as already done in li
On 21/05/2020 14.05, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 5/20/20 10:32 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> With the transitional packages gone in 10.1.0-2, please add versioned
>> (epoched!) provides on the old names (as already done in libgcc-s1)
>> in order to keep old packages installable along the latest gcc
On 5/20/20 10:32 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: lib32gcc-s1,libx32gcc-s1
> Version: 10.1.0-2
> Severity: important
>
> With the transitional packages gone in 10.1.0-2, please add versioned
> (epoched!) provides on the old names (as already done in libgcc-s1)
> in order to keep old packages
Package: lib32gcc-s1,libx32gcc-s1
Version: 10.1.0-2
Severity: important
With the transitional packages gone in 10.1.0-2, please add versioned
(epoched!) provides on the old names (as already done in libgcc-s1)
in order to keep old packages installable along the latest gcc.
Thanks
Andreas
10 matches
Mail list logo