On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:21:14PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I don't know how we would want to build it; given the freeze it is
probably too late to build it from the GCC source package, unless we
want to build it from the gcc-3.4 source package (which presumably is
not part of base and
I spent some time talking with the glibc maintainers about this. These
are all my own opinions, but the others seemed to agree with me.
I think this would be a very good idea.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:12:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hi,
given the current sarge deadline and the
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:28:23PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now.
Oops. OK, it would have to be a separate GCC source package or depend
on a new version of toolchain-source then. We could do this just for
sarge and build it from gcc-3.4
gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now.
Daniel
--
/ Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---\
| We are Debian of Borg.|
| You will be packaged.
Daniel Burrows wrote:
gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now.
and gcc-3.3 also because of libstdc++5...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I spent some time talking with the glibc maintainers about this. These
are all my own opinions, but the others seemed to agree with me.
I think this would be a very good idea.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:12:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:35:29PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
There have been some reports of gcc-3.4 miscompiling the kernel but I
think that was fixed.
It was the gcc-3.3 version with activated hammer branch for amd64
creating broken kernels.
gcc-3.4 is fine for building Linux
7 matches
Mail list logo
