First of all, I don't see any valid reason why ftp-master would reject that
upload. There are certainly more packages which are not binNMUable. Plus
binNMUs don't make any sense because the library packages are arch all packages,
which need a sourceful upload anyway.
If we have to uglify the rel
Ohhh. wrong patches attached. I submit a bug to gcc-8-cross
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919141
Can you consider this patch?
YunQiang Su 于2019年1月10日周四 下午11:53写道：
>
> Please review my attached patch.
>
> Or by debdiff
> http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gcc-8-cros
Please review my attached patch.
Or by debdiff
http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gcc-8-cross/gcc-8-cross_24.dsc
http://mips64el.bfsu.edu.cn/debian/gcc-8-cross-mipsen/gcc-8-cross_25~cross1.dsc
YunQiang Su 于2019年1月10日周四 上午11:09写道：
>
> Bastian Blank 于2018年8月23日周四 上午1:37写道：
> >
> >
Bastian Blank 于2018年8月23日周四 上午1:37写道：
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 08:27:29AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 22.08.2018 06:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > The version of the source package (2) does not show up in the binary
> > > version.
> > > So neither rebuilds with a new changelog, nor bin
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 08:27:29AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 22.08.2018 06:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The version of the source package (2) does not show up in the binary
> > version.
> > So neither rebuilds with a new changelog, nor bin-nmus will work. You
> > already
> > add a "cross
On 22.08.2018 06:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> The version of the source package (2) does not show up in the binary version.
> So neither rebuilds with a new changelog, nor bin-nmus will work. You already
> add a "cross1", so why not add it there?
that's how it is done for all cross packages. The
The version of the source package (2) does not show up in the binary version.
So neither rebuilds with a new changelog, nor bin-nmus will work. You already
add a "cross1", so why not add it there?
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were reje
Signature for changes file was already seen at 2018-08-21 05:13:43.978918.
Please refresh the signature of the changes file if you want to upload it again.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which add
can you help to reject
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_1_amd64.changes
too.
In _1 I forget to upload binary=all packages, due to lack of -A option
of sbuild.
Debian FTP Masters 于2018年8月21日周二 下午1:13写道：
>
>
> gcc-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu_8.2.0-4cross1_amd64.deb: Does not match file
> already existing in t
gcc-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu_8.2.0-4cross1_amd64.deb: Does not match file
already existing in the pool.
binary:cpp-8-mipsisa32r6-linux-gnu is NEW.
binary:cpp-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu is NEW.
binary:cpp-8-mipsisa64r6-linux-gnuabi64 is NEW.
binary:cpp-8-mipsisa64r6el-linux-gnuabi64 is NEW.
bin
10 matches
Mail list logo
