I think our current gcc 2.95.4 is stable enough, and sufficiently better
than the 2.95.2 in potato, that we should consider making new packages to go
into 2.2r4 or whatever the next version is going to be. I guess this should
be straightforward enough to achieve.
Anybody object to this? If
Philip Blundell writes:
I think our current gcc 2.95.4 is stable enough, and sufficiently better
than the 2.95.2 in potato, that we should consider making new packages to go
into 2.2r4 or whatever the next version is going to be. I guess this should
be straightforward enough to achieve.
the current 2.95.4 doesn't builf on s390, but 2.95.3, so it might be
necessary to add a reverse-diff (for woody as well).
Is there any bug open for this? I couldn't find one from a quick look at the
lists for gcc and gcc-2.95. In any case I don't think we have to worry about
it for potato --
I sincerely doubt that this will ever get past the Release Manager
unless you have a very good, very specific reason. I recommend talking
to him before spending your time.
I think it's worth making the packages even if the Release Manager (who is
that for potato these days, anyway?) won't
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 08:23:17PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
I sincerely doubt that this will ever get past the Release Manager
unless you have a very good, very specific reason. I recommend talking
to him before spending your time.
I think it's worth making the packages even if the
5 matches
Mail list logo
