Processed: retitle 290438

2005-01-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#256452: marked as done ([PR 16225] [3.5 regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed.)

2005-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Re: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: cannot install

2005-01-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 291060 + experimental confirmed Bug#291060: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: cannot install There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental, confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#291605: marked as done (gcc-4.0: GCC4 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault)

2005-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2005 19:25:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 21 11:25:39 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from

Bug#291060: marked as done (libstdc++6-4.0-doc: cannot install)

2005-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
, 18 Jan 2005 15:09:11 +0100 From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: cannot install X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Tue, 18 Jan

Processed: Re: Bug#293076: g++-3.3 uninformative error when base class missing

2005-01-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
-upstream Tags added: upstream retitle 293076 [fixed in 3.4] g++-3.3 uninformative error when base class missing Bug#293076: g++-3.3 uninformative error when base class missing Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Processed: [ARM] gcc optimisation bug (-O2 fails; -O0 and -O1 work)

2001-03-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 91823 gcc-2.95 Bug#91823: binutils will not build on arm Bug reassigned from package `binutils' to `gcc-2.95'. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#91846: marked as done (g++: /usr/doc/g++-2.95/README.C++ mentions docs but not package)

2001-03-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:38:51 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#91846: g++: /usr/doc/g++-2.95/README.C++ mentions docs but not package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: changing severity of gcc bug

2001-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 90143 wishlist Bug#90143: source parallelisation suggestion Severity set to `wishlist'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#90370: marked as done (I can not install the package because of 'error code (1)')

2001-03-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
(MET) Received: from sergio by TodoSCSI with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14fBlN-0005lK-00; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 03:20:45 +0100 From: Sergio González González [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: I can not install the package because of 'error code (1

Bug#82257: marked as done (manpages-dev: This package should REALLY be in a dev task!)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:54:49 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in task-devel-0.7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#90355: marked as done (Upstream changelog missing)

2001-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Upstream changelog missing Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 Sender

Bug#90390: marked as done (gcc-2.95: builds binary-indep packages in binary-arch target)

2001-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:09:18 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.3-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#92022: marked as done (Change to Suggests)

2001-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Change to Suggests Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i X-Reportbug-Version

Bug#92153: marked as done (gcc-2.95: fails to build)

2001-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:15:50 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 2.95.3-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gcc272 2.7.2.3-18

2001-04-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 12375 + fixed Bug#12375: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: -O2 produces bad code ! Tags added: fixed tag 20606 + fixed Bug#20606: [Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: register variable corruption Tags added: fixed tag 20889 + fixed Bug#20889: [Fixed in

Bug#92526: marked as done (glibc missing vital component)

2001-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:34:38 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#92526: glibc missing vital component has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#93226: Optimisation bug when building gnome-pim 1.4.0 with -O2

2001-04-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 93226 libglib1.2 Bug#93226: Optimisation bug when building gnome-pim 1.4.0 with -O2 Bug reassigned from package `gcc-2.95' to `libglib1.2'. rename 93266 Bit tests are redefined when G_CAN_INLINE is defined (in glib.h) Unknown command or

Bug#12375: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: -O2 produces bad code !)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#20606: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: register variable corruption)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#24788: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc with -save-temps does not compile)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#26100: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc: -dynamic is not default as it should be)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#34322: marked as done ([Fix in gcc-2.9x] [m68k] gcc-2.7.2.3-7 miscompiles apcalc_2.10.3t5.46-1)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#4429: marked as done ([Fixed in {gcc,egcc}-2.92.21] gcc argument validation could be better)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#4430: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc -O coredumps)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#48726: marked as done ([fixed in gcc-2.9[67] branch] kernel 2.3.2[34] compiled with this gcc will not swap)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#4954: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] cc -pipe hangs)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#5367: marked as done ([Fix in {gcc,egcc}-2.91.x] gcc -O2 fails for INT_MIN long long INT_MAX)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: retitle gcc bug

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 87909 [workaround applied] not installable on the Hurd Bug#87909: not installable on the Hurd Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#54544: marked as done (Missing definitions in /usr/include/asm/io.h)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#63154: marked as done (gcc 2.7.2.3 optimizer bug for long long comparisons)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:52:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing gcc272 bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#68452: marked as done (ash gets miscompiled on sparc32 with -O2)

2001-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian)) id 13KL3d-00048N-00; Thu, 03 Aug 2000 08:29:09 -0500 Received: from chris by koenig with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13KL3V-eM-00; Thu, 03 Aug 2000 15:29:01 +0200 From: Christian Meder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#93278: marked as done (gcc-2.95: gcc segfaults on kernel 2.4.3)

2001-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:52:51 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed with gcc-2.95-2.95.4-0.010407 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#93786: marked as done (arm-loop.dpatch)

2001-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:57:29 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#93786: arm-loop.dpatch has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#93481: marked as done (pragma pack works on x86; ignored on arm)

2001-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
(Debian)) id 14mo1k-u0-00; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:37:08 -0400 From: Ben Darnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pragma pack works on x86; ignored on arm X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14 Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:37:08 -0400

Processed: Re: This is still reproducable with libc6

2001-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 20695 gcc-2.95 Bug#20695: register parameters lost when profiling Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `gcc-2.95'. severity 20695 fixed Bug#20695: register parameters lost when profiling Severity set to `fixed'. retitle 20695

Processed: Bug#94137: gcc -mieee-with-inexact on ev67 gives wrong results

2001-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 94137 gcc Bug#94137: octave gives wrong results on Alpha 21264 Bug reassigned from package `octave' to `gcc'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#94891: %zd printf spec generates warning, even in c9x mode

2001-04-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 94981 No help available for Vim Bug#94981: [fixed in 3.0] %zd printf spec generates warning, even in c9x mode Changed Bug title. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) retitle 94891 [fixed in 3.0] %zd printf spec generates

Bug#79882: marked as done (compile failure in BIND 8 on woody)

2001-04-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:39 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010425 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#94038: marked as done (Build-depends wrong on hurd-i386)

2001-04-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Build-depends wrong on hurd-i386 X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14 Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 02:02:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-2.95 Severity

Bug#94127: marked as done (debian/rules2 contains Linuxism)

2001-04-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debian/rules2 contains Linuxism X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 00:19:37 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-2.95 Severity

Bug#94899: marked as done (Info page for C dialect options shows '-fstd' needs '-std')

2001-04-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14rP49-0002hv-00; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 13:58:37 -0500 Received: from gbsadler by localhost with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14rP48-Bn-00; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 13:58:36 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 13:58:36 -0500 From: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug

Processed: severity of gcc bug

2001-04-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 89023 normal Bug#89023: m68k: does not buid, uses illegal assembler code? Severity set to `normal'. retitle 89023 [m68k, workaround] does not buid, uses illegal assembler code? Bug#89023: m68k: does not buid, uses illegal assembler code?

Processed: Re: Bug#95800: upgrade is broken

2001-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 95800 libdb2 Bug#95800: upgrade is broken Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++2.10-dev' to `libdb2'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#95955: glibc doesn't build from source

2001-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 95955 gcc-2.95 Bug#95955: glibc doesn't build from source Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `gcc-2.95'. retitle 95955 gcc-2.95.4: fails to compile glibc, but 2.95.3-11 works Bug#95955: glibc doesn't build from source Changed Bug title.

Processed: Re: Bug#95978: glibc; Fails to build from source

2001-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 95978 gcc-2.95 Bug#95978: glibc; Fails to build from source Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `gcc-2.95'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: new email address (newer than the bugs, anyway)

2001-05-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 30774 Bug#30774: ppp: pppd kills entire process group on exit Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kalle Olavi Niemitalo [EMAIL PROTECTED] reopen 30774 ! Bug#30774: ppp: pppd kills entire process group on exit Bug reopened, originator

Bug#96099: marked as done (gcc bug(s))

2001-05-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2001 19:18:23 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#96099: gcc bug(s) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#97796: marked as done (gpc 'include file bug')

2001-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 May 2001 19:30:41 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#97796: gpc 'include file bug' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code

2001-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 97030 normal Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code Severity set to `normal'. retitle 97030 [fixed in gcc-3.0] wrong code generation Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing

Bug#95318: marked as forwarded (gcc-3.0: unnecessary cwtl)

2001-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2001 20:35:31 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #95318, regarding gcc-3.0: unnecessary cwtl to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system administrator and

Bug#97904: marked as forwarded (gcc-3.0: Pointless moving)

2001-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2001 20:39:53 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #97904, regarding gcc-3.0: Pointless moving to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system administrator and

Processed: forwarded gcc bug

2001-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 43170 [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class Bug#43170: Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class Changed Bug title. forwarded 43170 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't

Processed: please recheck with recent compiler versions

2001-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 63546 amaya Bug#63546: mistranslation of amaya on ix86 Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `amaya'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gcc-defaults 0.8

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 93929 + fixed Bug#93929: chill has description of objective-c Tags added: fixed tag 96272 + fixed Bug#96272: Typo in Suggests? Tags added: fixed tag 96273 + fixed Bug#96273: Typo in Suggests Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here.

Bug#93157: marked as done (Please provide a better description)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
by ysabell with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14leqc-nT-00; Sat, 07 Apr 2001 00:36:54 +0200 Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 00:36:54 +0200 From: Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please provide a better description Message-ID: [EMAIL

Bug#93343: marked as done (README.Bugs.gz is gratitiously Latin-1; should be ASCII)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: README.Bugs.gz is gratitiously Latin-1; should be ASCII X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.15 Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 20:39:08 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package

Bug#93597: marked as done (libgcj300-dev should Depend: on libgcj300)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#93929: marked as done (chill has description of objective-c)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: chill has description of objective-c X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14 Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 06:26:42 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL

Bug#94576: marked as done (libgcj300-dev should conflict with libgcj0)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
02:08:24 - Received: from cesarb by flower.cesarb with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14qQLO-0001J1-00; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 23:08:22 -0300 From: Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgcj300-dev should conflict with libgcj0 X

Bug#96262: marked as done (bad descriptions)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bad descriptions X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.15 Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 22:20:50 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libgcc0 Version: N

Bug#95812: marked as done (gcc-3.0-doc: Dead link: /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.0-doc/gcc-3.0.info.gz)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#96348: marked as done (libgcj2-dev must depend on libgcj2)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
19:07:59 - Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14vkvk-0008LC-00; Fri, 04 May 2001 21:07:56 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgcj2-dev must depend on libgcj2 X

Bug#96273: marked as done (Typo in Suggests)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Typo in Suggests Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15 Sender: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL

Bug#96451: marked as done (File conflict)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#96448: marked as done (Should replace libstdc++3.0-doc)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#96461: marked as done (File conflicts with libgcj300)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#97030: marked as done ([fixed in gcc-3.0] wrong code generation)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#97905: marked as done (libstdc++3-dev; Bad /usr/lib/libstdc++.la)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#97769: marked as done (gcc-2.95: missing build dependency)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:12:06 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds2-0.010522) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#98851: marked as done (Should have versioned depend on libgcc0?)

2001-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
: Gordon Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Should have versioned depend on libgcc0? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-Reportbug-Version

Bug#94791: marked as done (pine fails to compile)

2001-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2001 18:36:23 +0200 (MEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#94791: pine fails to compile has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#100110: marked as done (interactive postinst on gcc-3.0-base)

2001-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:36:29 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed with gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds7-0pre010609) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#100535: marked as done (gcc-3.0-20010610 refuses to compile correct (?) code)

2001-06-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:15:44 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#100535: gcc-3.0-20010610 refuses to compile correct has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: both are the same bug...

2001-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 100447 grave Bug#100447: gcc-3.0-doc: Installation fails Severity set to `grave'. merge 100447 100459 Bug#100447: gcc-3.0-doc: Installation fails Bug#100459: Installation of gcc-3.0-doc fails Merged 100447 100459. thanks Stopping processing

Processed: this one too

2001-06-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 100863 grave Bug#100863: Instalation problem: c-tree-300.info.gz don't exist Severity set to `grave'. merge 100863 100459 Bug#100459: Installation of gcc-3.0-doc fails Bug#100863: Instalation problem: c-tree-300.info.gz don't exist

Bug#100447: marked as done (gcc-3.0-doc: Installation fails)

2001-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#100863: marked as done (Instalation problem: c-tree-300.info.gz don't exist)

2001-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#101346: marked as done (refuses to compile a simple source)

2001-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Jun 2001 19:39:00 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fog.mors.wiggy.net (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) id f5IHcvEK025412; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:38:57 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#101328: marked as done (gcj no longer compiles...)

2001-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
+1000 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by MrSilly.MrMen (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) id f5IDkOSP001769; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:46:24 +1000 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: crazney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcj

Bug#101069: marked as done (ld cannot find -lgcc_s)

2001-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Processed: retitle gcc reports (2nd try)

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 62309 + fixed Bug#62309: [fixed in 3.0] Internal compiler error: program cc1obj got fatal signal 11 Tags added: fixed tags 83221 + fixed Bug#83221: [fixed in 3.0] g++ dies with internal error Tags added: fixed tags 87540 + fixed Bug#87540:

Processed: merge gcc bugs

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 100571 92524 Bug#92524: Severe performance problem with sstream Bug#100571: libstdc++2.10-dev: sstream still buggy in 2.95.4-0.010604 Merged 92524 100571. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham

Processed: Bug#101795: dist-upgrade fails: perl: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2' not found (required by /lib/libdb.so.3)

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 101795 perl Bug#101795: dist-upgrade fails: perl: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2' not found (required by /lib/libdb.so.3) Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++2.10-dev' to `perl'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#101901: marked as done (g++-3.0 and --use-cxa-atexit)

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
bonnaud by irancy.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15DO85-0008P5-00; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:25:33 +0200 From: laurent bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: g++-3.0 and --use-cxa-atexit X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18 X-Mailer: reportbug

Bug#102041: marked as done (libgcj2-dev depends on nonexisting libgcc0)

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
: from cesarb by flower.cesarb with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15Dwlo-00016V-00; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:24:52 -0300 From: Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgcj2-dev depends on nonexisting libgcc0 X-Reportbug-Version: 1.17 X

Bug#101743: marked as done (gccbug-3.0 failure)

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
bonnaud by irancy.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15CzdX-00080M-00; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:16:23 +0200 From: laurent bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gccbug-3.0 failure X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18 Date

Bug#101570: marked as done (gcc-3.0_3.0.ds9-1(unstable):)

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#101637: marked as done (Cannot resume after failure in binary-libstdcxx.mk)

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#101534: marked as done (README.FIRST says gcc-3.0 is a development snapshot)

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Jun 2001 23:25:52 +0200 From: André Dahlqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: README.FIRST says gcc-3.0 is a development snapshot X-Reportbug-Version: 1.17 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.17 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:25:51 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender

Bug#101557: marked as done ([HTML docs] danglink link)

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
, 20 Jun 2001 04:35:50 +0300 From: Eray Ozkural (exa) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Bilkent University X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [HTML docs] danglink link Content-Type

Bug#58412: marked as done ([alpha] r-base: Can't build from source)

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:27:14 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line r-base on alpha has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#51266: marked as done ([fixed upstream 20010121] Internal compiler error in `emit_move_insn_1' when compiling xt)

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcj-3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#51227: marked as done ([fixed in libgcj CVS 20000303] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError when doing Runtime.exec)

2001-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcj-3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#102198: marked as done (libgcc_s.so.0 not found)

2001-06-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgcc_s.so.0 not found X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:35:46 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcj Version: 2:3.0-4 Severity: important Tags: sid

Bug#100983: marked as done (gcc-3.0-010613 refuses to compile programs)

2001-06-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:22:42 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Processed: has this been fixed? or still there? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: kicq is built for unstable

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 79241 kicq Bug#79241: improper (or failed) handeling of -I Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `kicq'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: report #84935

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 84935 aptitude Bug#84935: g++ fails to compile aptitude on the mips architecture Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `aptitude'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator,

Bug#65364: marked as done ([alpha] main() {char data[10000000];} crashes)

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
.extern.uni-tuebingen.de via sendmail from stdin id [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:45:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: main

Bug#100571: marked as done (libstdc++2.10-dev: sstream still buggy in 2.95.4-0.010604)

2001-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:17:29 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 2.95.4.ds3-0.010628 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >