On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 23:38:00 +0100, Michal Kolesar wrote:
There is a problem with HW?
Not necessarily. It may be a problem with the way the hardware is
configured, or with the drivers you're using and there is still a small
chance it really is a problem in gcc.
Or in gcc?
I doubt it. If
[Please do not use HTML in email. This is email, not the web]
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 16:57:10 +1300, Etienne Le Sueur wrote:
I have recently tried to install g++, using dpkg. When I do so, dpkg
reports a dependancy problem with libstdc++-dev.
Ok, now when I go to install libstdc++-dev to
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:22:18 +0100
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JD( [Please do not use HTML in email. This is email, not the web]
JD( On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 16:57:10 +1300, Etienne Le Sueur wrote:
I have recently tried to install g++, using dpkg. When I do so, dpkg
reports a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version
Hi!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 08:00:04PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems
Hi!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version
Hi!
You'll also note that my versions are later than yours. Please update
yourself, as the problem does not exist in relatively current unstable.
I did apt-get install binutils gcc on the school machine, and problem
went away, so it seems newer versions fix that.
Hi!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version
reassign 130591 binutils
thanks
I'm reassigning this to binutils. Chris, seems to be a woody-only
bug...
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 08:18:41PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -l gcc-2.95 binutils
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
Hi!
reassign 130591 binutils
thanks
I'm reassigning this to binutils. Chris, seems to be a woody-only
bug...
Hold on, apt-get install gcc binutils fixed that on the woody. So it
probably *used to be* binutils bug ;-).
Pavel
Installing:
chill_2.95.4-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-10_i386.deb
cpp_2.95.4-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_2.95.4-10_i386.deb
g++_2.95.4-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_2.95.4-10_i386.deb
g77_2.95.4-10_i386.deb
to
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:58:21 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#115127: fixed in gcc-defaults 0.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:58:21 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#117285: fixed in gcc-defaults 0.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
upstream report is bootstrap/5209, currently open.
accessible at http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl
15 matches
Mail list logo
