(damn, this mailer sucks, sorry for any mangling)
Bryce Wilcox-O'Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I use Crypto++ v5.0 [1], and I've noticed that the generate a random
RSA key pair function either seg faults or goes into an infinite
loop. I've learned that turning optimization off with -O0 or else
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-4
Severity: normal
While compiling the kernel on a sparc system I get the following errors in
kernel-source-2.4.22/arch/sparc/kernel/check_asm.c:
gcc -o check_asm check_asm.c
check_asm.c:309: error: field name not in record or union initializer
check_asm.c:309:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
The offending line is
.section.note.GNU-stack
at the end of the initialization of unsigned int check_asm_data[].
This is not valid sytax. It ought to be
.section = .note.GNU-stack
Please reassign to the source package.
Actually, it works just like it is supposed to work. That may not be the
same as in the past, but it's the way it should be. Granted the surprise
is something the users will have to adjust to, but that doesn't mean
things shouldn't work properly.
On a 64-bit machine, one should expect to
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:04:52AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
Actually, it works just like it is supposed to work. That may not be the
same as in the past, but it's the way it should be. Granted the surprise
is something the users will have to adjust to, but that doesn't mean
things
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-19
16:12 ---
*** Bug 13123 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Package: gcj-3.3
Version: 3.3.2-4
Severity: normal
Greetings,
gcj-3.3 ICEs during at attempted build of babel 0.8.8. The compile
command is quite ugly:
javac -g -d . -classpath
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gcj-3.3 ICEs during at attempted build of babel 0.8.8. The compile
command is quite ugly:
javac -g -d . -classpath
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 16:13, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gcj-3.3 ICEs during at attempted build of babel 0.8.8. The compile
command is quite ugly:
javac -g -d . -classpath
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 221621 kernel-source-2.4.22
Bug#221621: gcc-3.3: fails to compile the linux kernel
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3' to `kernel-source-2.4.22'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
I am interested in excelsior living room tables,
sofa tables, etc, and bedroon furniture. Is there a cheaper way to buy
these products other than in a retail store?
Sincerely
Debra Noel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 221621 kernel-image-sparc-2.4
quit
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 03:48:12PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 221621 kernel-source-2.4.22
Bug#221621: gcc-3.3: fails to compile the linux kernel
Bug reassigned from package
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:13:33AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
reassign 221621 kernel-image-sparc-2.4
quit
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 03:48:12PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 221621 kernel-source-2.4.22
Bug#221621: gcc-3.3:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:17:16PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
But this is a bug in the kernel source, not in the sparc kernel package.
Why should it be assigned to the kernel-image-sparc package when it has
to be fixed in the kernel-source package?
The kernel-source package does not support
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:30:11AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:17:16PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
But this is a bug in the kernel source, not in the sparc kernel package.
Why should it be assigned to the kernel-image-sparc package when it has
to be fixed in the
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:14:30PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
Just because the binaries are built somewhere else does not defer the
fact that the bug is in the source. He's having a problem building the
kernel-source package, and that has to be fixed there, not in
kernel-image-sparc. Even if
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2003-11-19 23:28
---
The same ICE has also been reported for another program in the Debian bug
tracking system. See http://bugs.debian.org/221738
--
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:25:21AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:14:30PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
Just because the binaries are built somewhere else does not defer the
fact that the bug is in the source. He's having a problem building the
kernel-source package, and
reassign 221621 kernel
quit
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:23:04PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
OK. I'm happy to do this as long as you don't mind any patch
conflicts as a result this should your architecture require
patches later on.
If you agree with that, please reassign the bug back to
19 matches
Mail list logo
