Hello,
My PARI package has the bad habits of breaking compiler. Worse
of all, problems are often run-time and not compile-time.
Currently on hppa, arm and ia64 gcc-2.95 cannot build working binaries,
but gcc-3.0 work.
So should I force the package to be build with gcc-3.0 on these archs ?
And
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 10:57:16PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
What is the best solution ?
Build-Depends: gcc-3.0 [arm]
use CC=gcc-3.0 for configuring/building on arm. hppa and ia64 don't
have gcc-2.95 at all.
OK, but default gcc is not gcc-3.0 on merulo (ia64)
merulo% gcc -v
Reading
Package: gcc
Version: 2:2.95.4-8
Severity: minor
Hello,
gcc by default allows dollars in identifiers on i386.
Unfortunately, the assembler does not like them.
%cat bug.c EOF
int $b;
main()
{
for($b=0;$b10;$b++)
{
printf(%d\n,$b);
}
}
EOF
% gcc bug.c
/tmp/cc2uXoLV.s: Assembler
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 07:18:43PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I look at this differently; it's our job to be accepting and GCC's job
to be conformant. With Joseph and others actively deprecating
extensions, that seems a better
From: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the example given no longer segfaults on paer.debian.org; i presume an
upload since has fixed this bug.
I cannot confirm it:
paer% gcc -O3 preproc.c
../src/basemath/arith2.c: In function `compimagraw':
../src/basemath/arith2.c:1219: Internal error:
Hello, now the SEGV in ld is fixed, but I still get
paer% gcc -O3 ~/preproc.c
../src/basemath/arith2.c: In function `compimagraw':
../src/basemath/arith2.c:1219: Internal error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See
Package: gcc
Version: 1:2.95.2-13.1
Severity: normal
Hello,
The following program is miscompiled by gcc on debussy.debian.org :
---
typedef unsigned long ulong;
main()
{
ulong x=3221225472UL;
ulong y=2UL;
printf(x%y=%lu\n,(ulong)(x%y));
}
---
./a.out
x%y=1073741824
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:31:35PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
tags 130394 + potato
I suppose that mean you have tested and it works ? Then see below.
please could you recheck with current compilers in testing/unstable?
Not until debussy is up again, because I have no account on a arm outside
Package: gcc-4.6-doc
Severity: normal
Hello Debian GCC maintainers,
Please upload gcc-4.5-doc and gcc-4.6-doc to unstable,
since gcc-4.5 and gcc-4.6 are in unstable.
Cheers,
--
Bill. ballo...@debian.org
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6.0-7
Severity: normal
Hello Debian GCC Maintainers,
gcc 4.6 on Debian/amd64 miscompiles PARI/GP SVN revision 12000:
Step to reproduce:
wget 'http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/~bill/pari-2.4.3.12000.tar.gz'
tar xf pari-2.4.3.12000.tar.gz
cd pari-2.4.3.alpha
./Configure
Package: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6.0-12
Severity: normal
Hello Debian GCC Maintainers,
gcc-4.6 miscompiles gp2c on several platforms including powerpc, see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gp2c
On powerpc (32 bit):
The function 'listostack' in src/utils.c is miscompiled with -O2.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:18:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 627084 pari
Bug #627084 [gcc-4.6] gcc-4.6: miscompile PARI/GP SVN revision 12000
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-4.6' to 'pari'.
Bug No longer marked as
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 06:17:55PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.6-4
Severity: normal
Hello Debian GCC Maintainers,
On ia64, gcc ICE while compiling PARI/GP 2.5.0.
This happens with:
sid: gcc 4.4.6-4
squeeze: gcc 4.4.5-8
The compiler below works
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.6-4
Severity: normal
Hello Debian GCC Maintainers,
On ia64, gcc ICE while compiling PARI/GP 2.5.0.
This happens with:
sid: gcc 4.4.6-4
squeeze: gcc 4.4.5-8
The compiler below works:
sid : gcc 4.6.0-12
lenny: gcc 4.3.2-1.1
How to reproduce:
wget
Package: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6.1-4
Severity: normal
Hello Debian GCC Maintainers,
gcc-4.6 miscompiles pari 2.5.0 on sparc, see
See
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pariarch=sparcver=2.5.0-1stamp=1311418380
Please find a small test-case attached (test.c)
gcc -O2 -g -Wall
Hello GCC maintainers,
Please find a smaller test-case.
smetana% gcc -O3 -Wall -g test.c -o test
smetana% ./test
zsh: segmentation fault ./test
smetana% gcc -O3 -Wall -g test.c -o test -fno-inline
smetana% ./test
smetana%
Cheers,
--
Bill. ballo...@debian.org
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Package: g++-4.4
Version: 4.4.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Hello Debian GCC Maintainers,
There is a circular dependency between g++-4.4 and libstdc++6-4.4-dev:
g++-4.4 :Depends: libstdc++6-4.4-dev (= 4.4.0-1)
libstdc++6-4.4-dev :Depends: g++-4.4 (= 4.4.0-1)
Given that both
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 10:50:56PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Bill Allombert schrieb:
Given that both package are arch:any, are build from the same source and are
required to be always installed together with the exact same version,
the split is not particulary useful. So I would suggest
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.1-2
Severity: important
Hello Debian GCC Maintainers,
Compiling the file linked below (on amd64)
http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/misc/gcc44bug.i.gz
with
gcc-4.4 -c -O2 -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -o base3.o gcc44bug.i
cause gcc to eat all available memory and
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 04:00:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.1-2
Severity: important
Hello Debian GCC Maintainers,
Compiling the file linked below (on amd64)
http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/misc/gcc44bug.i.gz
with
gcc-4.4 -c -O2 -Wall -fno-strict
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 04:38:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:03:40PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
please send a fix. I do not intend to touch this code. it's fixed in
the 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1 packages.
Hello Matthias,
Daniel
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:15:39PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:43:47AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
crest% wget http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/misc/kernel.i
crest% gcc-4.0 -c -O1 -fomit-frame-pointer -g -o kernel.o kernel.i
I just did this with gcc
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:10:51AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 04:38:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Matthias,
Daniel and Matt Krai provided a patch for this bug.
Do you plan to upload
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 2.95.4.ds15-25
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hello GCC maintainers,
gcc-2.95 FTBFS on alpha as seen here:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-2.95%26ver=2.95.4.ds15-25%26arch=alpha%26stamp=1149582600%26file=log
While investigating, I found a simple work-around:
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-13
Hello Debian GCC maintainers,
On m68k, gcc-4.1 miscompile the function darg in the file
src/basemath/trans2.c of the pari package version 2.3.0-2 when
using the following options:
gcc-4.1 -c -g -O2 -Wall -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -I.
found 385327 4.1.1-19
quit
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:19:20AM -0700, Matthias Klose wrote:
Source: gcc-4.1
Source-Version: 4.1.1ds2-17
[Roman Zippel]
* debian/patches/m68k-secondary-addr-reload.dpatch: Add secondary reloads
to allow reload to get byte values into addr regs.
notfound 385327 4.1.1-20
quit
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 01:32:34PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:19:20AM -0700, Matthias Klose wrote:
Source: gcc-4.1
Source-Version: 4.1.1ds2-17
[Roman Zippel]
* debian/patches/m68k-secondary-addr-reload.dpatch: Add
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20041030-1
Severity: normal
Hello Matthias,
gcc-snapshot generate incorrect code for the attached file with
-O1 and above. It is correctly compiled with -O0.
%gcc div.c -O0
%./a.out
1 2 4 8 5 10 20 40 25 50 100 200 125 250 500 1000
%gcc div.c -O1
%./a.out
1 2 5 10
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.5-3
Severity: normal
Hello GCC developers and ARM porters,
gcc-3.3 -O3 -fPIC miscompile pari on ARM.
(see
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=pariver=2.1.6-1arch=armstamp=1102707589file=logas=raw)
More precisely the file src/basemath/alglin1.c
is miscompiled
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 05:11:15PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Bill Allombert writes:
If you want, I might dig farther into the problem at a later date.
OK, I checked with gcc-3.4, and it works fine. I didn't check gcc-4.0
since bug #280972 would cause it to fails anyway.
please attach
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 01:30:05PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Bill Allombert writes:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 05:11:15PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Bill Allombert writes:
If you want, I might dig farther into the problem at a later date.
OK, I checked with gcc-3.4, and it works
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.0-7
Severity: normal
Hello Debian GCC maintainers,
gcc-4.0 and gcc-snapshot generate wrong code for PARI/GP 2.2.10 on x86.
The source code can be found here:
http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/pub/pari/unstable/pari-2.2.10.alpha.tar.gz
The problem is in the file
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 09:01:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Bill Allombert writes:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:28:21AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Hi,
can you still reproduce this? (Apparently, upstream can't
(http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19008).) How about newer gcc?
Hello Falk
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:47:15PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
which 4.0 and 4.1 versions did you test?
OK, I checked gcc-snapshot on arm (still 4.0.0 20050110-1, unfortunately)
and it fix _that_ bug.
Sorry I should have tried that sooner,
gcc-4.0 from experimental is a bit
tags 309210 - moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 07:05:38PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
tags 309210 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
how can this problem be reproduced?
Easily:
1) download the tarball mentionned in the bug report and untar it
2) do
CC=gcc-4.0 ./Configure
3) do
make bench
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 07:05:38PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
tags 309210 + moreinfo
thanks
how can this problem be reproduced? Can you make a stand-alone
testcase?
So far I have gathered the following info:
This bug only affect gcc 4.0 build with configure --host=linux-i486.
It no more
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:58:30AM +0800, bear wrote:
Package: menu
Version: 2.1.26
Severity: important
hi,
The update-menu in menu-2.1.26 always outputs the following error:
update-menus: relocation error: update-menus: symbol
_ZN9__gnu_cxx6__poolILb1EE13_M_initializeEv,
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:32:28PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 2.59-0.2
Severity: grave
apt-listchanges just fails with error message
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/apt-listchanges, line 30, in ?
import apt_pkg
reopen 331150
found 331150 4.0.3-1
quit
Hello GCC maintainers,
I hit this bug again on crest which is running 4.0.3-1.
I retried the test suite I provided and I get the ICE back:
crest% wget http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/misc/kernel.i
crest% gcc-4.0 -c -O1 -fomit-frame-pointer -g -o
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-3
Severity: normal
Dear Debian GCC maintainers,
'info gcc' show gccint-3.3.info instead of gcc-3.3.info, and 'info cpp'
show cppinternals-3.2.info instead of cpp-3.2.info,
Cheers,
--
Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Imagine a large red swirl here.
-- System
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-3
Severity: normal
Dear GCC maintainers,
gcc 3.3 (1:3.3ds9-3) miscompile pari (2.1.5) on arm with -O3, whereas
gcc 3.2 (3.2.3 20030331) worked fine.
With -O2 gcc 3.3 works fine also
The preprocessed miscompiled file is available at
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:27:33AM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 16:26, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-3
Severity: normal
Dear GCC maintainers,
gcc 3.3 (1:3.3ds9-3) miscompile pari (2.1.5) on arm with -O3, whereas
gcc 3.2 (3.2.3
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:27:33AM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 16:26, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-3
Severity: normal
Dear GCC maintainers,
gcc 3.3 (1:3.3ds9-3) miscompile pari (2.1.5) on arm with -O3, whereas
gcc 3.2 (3.2.3
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 07:07:00PM -0400, Matthias Klose wrote:
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gcc-defaults, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
Changes:
gcc-defaults (1.8) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add sparc-gcc.c wrapper
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:12:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Bill Allombert writes:
Is it really supposed to cure the problem that
info gcc show gccint-3.3 instead of gcc-3.3 ?
At least it does not on my system.
OK, the changelog was not very clear in that regard.
it does for me
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Please could you recheck with current gcc-3.3? gcc-3.4 isn't a choice
to test, as it fails to build on arm.
I checked with gcc (1:3.3.2ds3-0pre5) on debussy
and it appears that all the problems mentioned are solved.
With the
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2ds4-3
Severity: normal
Hello GCC maintainers,
On ia64, gcc fails to compile the following file
(available at
http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/misc/test2.c
)
merulo% gcc test2.c
test2.c: In function `muluu':
test2.c:20: error: `asm' operand requires impossible
Package: g++-8
Version: 8.1.0-1
Severity: normal
Hello GCC maintainers,
trying to the attached dummy file with g++-8 fails:
g++-8 -m32 hello.c
In file included from /usr/include/c++/8/stdlib.h:36,
from hello.c:1:
/usr/include/c++/8/cstdlib:41:10: fatal error: bits/c++config.h:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:26:53PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Building such i386 chroots now would require heavy use of snaphots.debian.org,
> and would be much less convenient.
>
> > Also there are amd64 ->
> > i386 cross compilers for the newer versions. Is it reall
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 21/05/2020 14.05, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 5/20/20 10:32 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> With the transitional packages gone in 10.1.0-2, please add versioned
> >> (epoched!) provides on the old names (as already done in
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:02:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 8/13/20 11:49 AM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:25:21AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> On 8/12/20 11:16 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:15:51PM
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:25:21AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 8/12/20 11:16 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:15:51PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> On 21/05/2020 14.05, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>> On 5/20/20 10
Package: gcc-12
Version: 12-20220302-1
Severity: normal
Dear GCC maintainers,
The following sample code gives a spurious warning with gcc-12:
gcc-12 -c -O3 -Wall test.c
test.c: In function ‘fun’:
test.c:5:25: warning: pointer ‘old’ used after ‘realloc’
[-Wuse-after-free]
5 | unsigned long
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 11:47:21PM +, James Addison wrote:
> Package: gcc-11
> Followup-For: Bug #1005863
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org, debian-rele...@lists.debian.org,
> debian-pol...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Bug #1005863 describes a gcc-11 behaviour that results
54 matches
Mail list logo
