attached.
--
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org
# 1 t4.c
# 1 built-in
# 1 command-line
# 1 t4.c
# 1 /usr/include/stdio.h 1 3 4
# 28 /usr/include/stdio.h 3 4
# 1 /usr/include/features.h 1 3 4
# 313 /usr/include/features.h 3 4
# 1 /usr/include/bits/predefs.h 1 3 4
# 314 /usr/include/features.h 2 3 4
# 346
Package: libgcc1-dbg
Version: 1:4.2.2-3
Severity: minor
Hi,
The symlink /usr/share/doc/libgcc1-dbg points to gcj-4.2-base without
depending on the corresponding package.
I assume the target should be gcc-4.2-base instead.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
the package only for the
supported architectures and have the others removed from the archive.
(This applies to -4.2 as well, I'll clone the bug later.)
Cheers,
--
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
on arm*
and mips* is certainly a wishlist bug, but distributing an empty package
instead looks RC to me.
(This applies to -4.2 as well, I'll clone the bug later.)
no, please do not.
OK.
Cheers,
--
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20090821-1
Severity: normal
Originally seen as #548943 (perl FTBFS on ia64)
Regression with gcc 4.3
Reported upstream at http://gcc.gnu.org/PR41551
merulo% cat t.c
int main(void)
{
int var, *p = var;
return (double)(unsigned long)(p);
}
merulo% gcc -O -c t.c
specify 'any'.
Cheers,
--
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by building with 4.8, but that's not a long
term solution.
Cc'ing the gcc maintainers. Should building with gcc-4.8 be considered
release critical for jessie?
(Help on this would be very welcome, so tagging.)
--
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
thout
arguments, so your "exit 1" in cr2.sh usage() now makes it fail.
+The interestingness test should not expect any command line arguments.
Hope this helps,
--
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org
.
--
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org
nsient. In any case, I doubt the fault is in gcc-9.
--
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org
e.
A bug report can be filed in the tracker at
<https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues>. Thanks!
make[1]: *** [Makefile:42: html] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>/docs'
make: *** [debian/rules:70: doc-stamp] Error 2
--
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org
broken by the backward incompatible changes in
make_4.3-1.
--
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org
debian/rules clean subprocess returned
exit status 2
This was presumably broken by the backward incompatible changes in
make_4.3-1.
--
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
