On 29-08-15 16:38, Jochen Topf wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> The CRC checksum tests still fail on big endian architectures:
>>
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libosmium&arch=s390x&ver=2.4.0-1&stamp=1440849718
>> https://buildd.d
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 29-08-15 13:23, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > On 29-08-15 11:29, Jochen Topf wrote:
> >>> On 21-08-15 22:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libosmium&suite=sid
> >>
> >
On 29-08-15 13:23, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 29-08-15 11:29, Jochen Topf wrote:
>>> On 21-08-15 22:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libosmium&suite=sid
>>
>> I have just released libsomium 2.4.0. This should resolve all open bugs.
>> I'll
On 29-08-15 11:29, Jochen Topf wrote:
>> On 21-08-15 22:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libosmium&suite=sid
>
> I have just released libsomium 2.4.0. This should resolve all open bugs.
> I'll make releases of the dependent packages if there are n
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 08:54:31AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 21-08-15 22:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > The addition of protozero not causes build failures on the big endian
> > architectures because it doesn't support them:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/sta
Hi Jochen,
On 21-08-15 22:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> The addition of protozero not causes build failures on the big endian
> architectures because it doesn't support them:
>
> [...]
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libosmium&suite=sid
>
> If this cannot be resolved, we
On 18-08-15 15:45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 18-08-15 14:04, Jochen Topf wrote:
>> I have just released new versions of libosmium, pyosmium, osmium-tool, and
>> osmcoastline. The largest difference is that libosmium now uses a different
>> pbf library which is included in the repository. Th
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 05:11:26PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 19-08-15 16:24, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:20:56PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >> On 18-08-15 21:13, Jochen Topf wrote:
> >>> I saw you added Depends: on a lot of -dev packages. I think thos
On 19-08-15 16:24, Jochen Topf wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:20:56PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 18-08-15 21:13, Jochen Topf wrote:
>>> I saw you added Depends: on a lot of -dev packages. I think those should
>>> only
>>> be Recommends: or so, because to use libosmium you don't
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:20:56PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 18-08-15 21:13, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 03:45:19PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >> On 18-08-15 14:04, Jochen Topf wrote:
> >>> I have just released new versions of libosmium, pyosmium, osmium
On 18-08-15 21:13, Jochen Topf wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 03:45:19PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 18-08-15 14:04, Jochen Topf wrote:
>>> I have just released new versions of libosmium, pyosmium, osmium-tool, and
>>> osmcoastline. The largest difference is that libosmium now uses
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 03:45:19PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 18-08-15 14:04, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > I have just released new versions of libosmium, pyosmium, osmium-tool, and
> > osmcoastline. The largest difference is that libosmium now uses a different
> > pbf library which is incl
On 18-08-15 14:04, Jochen Topf wrote:
> I have just released new versions of libosmium, pyosmium, osmium-tool, and
> osmcoastline. The largest difference is that libosmium now uses a different
> pbf library which is included in the repository. This means the protobuf
> and osmpbf dependencies are g
13 matches
Mail list logo
