On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 02:38:57AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
After upgrading libc package, then please stop-and-start network
services/daemons, because name service switch is changed in glibc 2.3.
Uh, you're going to fix this in a new upload,
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 12:35, Jeff Bailey wrote:
Do you think making libc6-dbg pre-depend instead of depend'ing on
libc6 (= 2.3.1-1) would work?
Should --- though, according to policy, libc6 will only be unpacked. But
since it is Essential: yes, it should work that way.
What a fun bug. Hope
Jeff Bailey said:
It had never occured to me to put the debug path in the cache file. I'm
not sure how common of a scenario that is, or it should've bitten
someone before.
I suppose so. I don't really know why I put it there in the first place.
:-) I was debugging a program and thought that
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 22:38, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Incidentally, you should also broaden the list of relevant services; I
would suggest adding kdm (and other display managers?), ssh-krb5, and
apache2 at the least.
Don't add display managers. At least with gdm I'm pretty sure that will
kill X
On Friday 18 October 2002 16:33, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:05:59PM +0200, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
This means glibc 2.2.92 looks rather complete on s390.
2.3.1-1 appears to have failed to build on s390 - I'm doing another
upload this evening. Can you take a look to see what's
At Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:42:52 +1000,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ldd script fails on non-executable files (such as most libraries)
if the file package is not installed.
This is caused by debian/patches/ldd.dpatch, which uses 'file' command.
See below diff:
- eval $add_env '$file' ||
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Sat Oct 19 07:27:45 MDT 2002
Log Message:
- debian/rules.d/shlibs.mk: bump up to 2.3.1-1. Closes: #165456
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Repository: glibc-package/debian/rules.d
who:gotom
time: Sat Oct 19 07:27:46 MDT 2002
Log Message:
- debian/rules.d/shlibs.mk: bump up to 2.3.1-1. Closes: #165456
Files:
changed:shlibs.mk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Repository: glibc-package/debian/control.in
who:jbailey
time: Sat Oct 19 08:00:16 MDT 2002
Log Message:
- debian/control.in/main: 2.13.90.0.10-1 is broken on s390
require 2.13.90.0.4-1 for them.
Files:
changed:main
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Sat Oct 19 08:00:16 MDT 2002
Log Message:
- debian/control.in/main: 2.13.90.0.10-1 is broken on s390
require 2.13.90.0.4-1 for them.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Oops,
At Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:12:10 +0900,
Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
Of course, it won't run
I should add on libc6 2.2.5-15 if I hold libc6 here
/usr/sbin/cannaserver: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by
/usr/sbin/cannaserver)
Thanks,
Fumitoshi UKAI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
I use postfix for local smtp. After upgrading kmail had trouble talking to it.
I then rebooted to ensure that all progs (at least those non static) were using
the new libc. There were still problems with smtp... Also my squid proxy was
refusing connections...
Think there is more to this
hi!
my xmms stopped working (sigseg) after the libc6 update, but i think thats the
known glib problem.
glpftd (as binary installed from www.glftpd.org) doesn't work anymore too. it's a
static linked binary, so i am really surprised. (its definitely the libc6
because it immediatly starts working
Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-13
Followup-For: Bug #165358
Hi,
with the new version of libc, I have :
1) htmerge (part of htdig package) that eats all of the memory and all
of the swap then the system begin killing tasks.
2) ppp
During the whole ppp session I get the following messages :
Oct 19
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 12:05, Justus Schwartz wrote:
glpftd (as binary installed from www.glftpd.org) doesn't work anymore too. it's a
static linked binary, so i am really surprised. (its definitely the libc6
because it immediatly starts working again, if i downgrade to 2.2.5)
ldd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 165411 libc6
Bug#165411: inetd: complaining about missing identd user
Bug reassigned from package `netkit-inetd' to `libc6'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Jeff Bailey said:
It had never occured to me to put the debug path in the cache file. I'm
not sure how common of a scenario that is, or it should've bitten
someone before.
I suppose so. I don't really know why I put it there in the first place.
:-) I was debugging a program and thought that
On Friday 18 October 2002 16:33, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:05:59PM +0200, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
This means glibc 2.2.92 looks rather complete on s390.
2.3.1-1 appears to have failed to build on s390 - I'm doing another
upload this evening. Can you take a look to see what's
At Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:42:52 +1000,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ldd script fails on non-executable files (such as most libraries)
if the file package is not installed.
This is caused by debian/patches/ldd.dpatch, which uses 'file' command.
See below diff:
- eval $add_env '$file' ||
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1
Severity: important
program compiled with libc6 2.3.1 requires libc6 (= 2.3.1), but
libc6 2.3.1-1 still has libc 6 libc6 (= 2.2.5-13) in libc6.shlibs.
For example, canna 3.5b2-50.deb is
Package: canna
Version: 3.5b2-50
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (=
Repository: glibc-package/debian/rules.d
who:gotom
time: Sat Oct 19 07:27:46 MDT 2002
Log Message:
- debian/rules.d/shlibs.mk: bump up to 2.3.1-1. Closes: #165456
Files:
changed:shlibs.mk
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Sat Oct 19 07:27:45 MDT 2002
Log Message:
- debian/rules.d/shlibs.mk: bump up to 2.3.1-1. Closes: #165456
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: glibc-package/debian/control.in
who:jbailey
time: Sat Oct 19 08:00:16 MDT 2002
Log Message:
- debian/control.in/main: 2.13.90.0.10-1 is broken on s390
require 2.13.90.0.4-1 for them.
Files:
changed:main
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Sat Oct 19 08:00:16 MDT 2002
Log Message:
- debian/control.in/main: 2.13.90.0.10-1 is broken on s390
require 2.13.90.0.4-1 for them.
Files:
changed:changelog
Hi,
I use postfix for local smtp. After upgrading kmail had trouble talking to it.
I then rebooted to ensure that all progs (at least those non static) were using
the new libc. There were still problems with smtp... Also my squid proxy was
refusing connections...
Think there is more to this
hi!
my xmms stopped working (sigseg) after the libc6 update, but i think thats the
known glib problem.
glpftd (as binary installed from www.glftpd.org) doesn't work anymore too. it's
a
static linked binary, so i am really surprised. (its definitely the libc6
because it immediatly starts working
Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-13
Followup-For: Bug #165358
Hi,
with the new version of libc, I have :
1) htmerge (part of htdig package) that eats all of the memory and all
of the swap then the system begin killing tasks.
2) ppp
During the whole ppp session I get the following messages :
Oct 19
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 06:05:16PM +0200, Justus Schwartz wrote:
hi!
my xmms stopped working (sigseg) after the libc6 update, but i think thats the
known glib problem.
glpftd (as binary installed from www.glftpd.org) doesn't work anymore too.
it's a
static linked binary, so i am really
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 12:05, Justus Schwartz wrote:
glpftd (as binary installed from www.glftpd.org) doesn't work anymore too.
it's a
static linked binary, so i am really surprised. (its definitely the libc6
because it immediatly starts working again, if i downgrade to 2.2.5)
ldd
* Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021019 22:07]:
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 12:05, Justus Schwartz wrote:
static linked binary, so i am really surprised. (its definitely the libc6
because it immediatly starts working again, if i downgrade to 2.2.5)
ldd /path/to/glftpd
Is it really
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: critical
Sun's j2sdk 1.4.0 no longer functions with this release of libc6:
-([EMAIL PROTECTED])-(~)- java
Error occurred during initialization of VM
Unable to load native library: /usr/local/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so:
symbol __libc_waitpid,
Your message dated Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:35:42 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#165509: libc6: At least Sun's JVM no longer works against
libc6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
At Sat, 19 Oct 2002 15:14:41 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 06:05:16PM +0200, Justus Schwartz wrote:
my xmms stopped working (sigseg) after the libc6 update, but i think thats
the
known glib problem.
glpftd (as binary installed from www.glftpd.org) doesn't
Your message dated Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:45:31 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#165512: libc6 breaks wine
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
34 matches
Mail list logo
