Bug#70762: textutils: tail segfault

2002-11-15 Thread Herbert Xu
H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But the original bug seems to be more of an issue: shouldn't it be a bug that tail chews up infinite amounts of memory when it can't find an end-of-line char? IMHO, tail should just bail out when it finds a line which is more than, say 10MB long (I'm being

Water Resources Textbook Software

2002-11-15 Thread Haestad Press
If you are unable to view the images in this email, please copy and paste the following url into your browser... http://www.haestad.com/books/wdm_021105 Visit http://www.haestad.com/comm_021105 to update communication preferences for [EMAIL PROTECTED] or

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey

2002-11-15 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Fri Nov 15 06:48:27 MST 2002 Log Message: - debian/patches/s390x-lib64.dpatch: New file. Thanks to Gerhard Tonn. Closes: #169176, #166450. Note: CVS patch disabled for this upload Files: changed:

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by jbailey

2002-11-15 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:jbailey time: Fri Nov 15 06:48:27 MST 2002 Log Message: - debian/patches/s390x-lib64.dpatch: New file. Thanks to Gerhard Tonn. Closes: #169176, #166450. Note: CVS patch disabled for this upload Files: changed:

Bug#70762: textutils: tail segfault

2002-11-15 Thread H. S. Teoh
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:23:24AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 04:00, Herbert Xu wrote: But the original bug seems to be more of an issue: shouldn't it be a bug that tail chews up infinite amounts of memory when it can't find an end-of-line char? IMHO, tail should

Bug#169176: Please add biarch support for s390

2002-11-15 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 03:13, Gerhard Tonn wrote: we have decided not to introduce s390x as a seperate architecture. We would like to handle s390x on s390 as sparc64 on sparc. This means that we run 31 bit userland on a 64 bit kernel and add biarch support to the toolchain. This also means

Bug#86761: locale.alias refers to non-generated locales

2002-11-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
The problem with 'locale -a' listing nonexisting locales was fixed in upstream CVS 2002-08-26. It made into release 2.3.1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#166979: Locales simply wont work

2002-11-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
It is safer to test using 'date', as this do not require external translation files. # locale-gen Generating locales... en_US.ISO-8859-1... done en_US.UTF-8... done es_ES.ISO-8859-1... done [EMAIL PROTECTED] done Generation complete. # date; LC_ALL=en_US date;

Where are the glibc 2.3.x source .deb's ?

2002-11-15 Thread Martin Baulig
Hi, is there any reason why we already have glibc 2.3.x binaries in sarge, but the latest source package is 2.2.5-14.3 ? I finally found the .diff.gz and the .orig.tar.gz in /pool/main/g/glibc, but /dists/sarge/main/source/Sources.gz still has 2.2.5-14.3. -- Martin Baulig [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: debian/patches review

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Fedrowitz
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:25:36PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: Hi, I'm just taking a look at this patch - Is this to work around a toolchain bug? Not a bug, a feature. ;) Why is this a problem on m68k and not anywhere else? Because m68k is one of the very few platforms where there's

Bug#70762: textutils: tail segfault

2002-11-15 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:23:24AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 04:00, Herbert Xu wrote: But the original bug seems to be more of an issue: shouldn't it be a bug that tail chews up infinite amounts of memory when it can't find an end-of-line char? IMHO, tail should

UNSUBSCRIBE

2002-11-15 Thread SaRgE
- Original Message - From: Martin Baulig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 5:43 PM Subject: Where are the glibc 2.3.x source .deb's ? Hi, is there any reason why we already have glibc 2.3.x binaries in sarge, but the latest source package is

$B"##M#L#M<:GT<T$N5U=1!*"#(B

2002-11-15 Thread mailmag 2 $B%S%8%M%9>pJs6I(B
$B!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!(B (B $B!!#W(-#E(-#E(-#K(-#L(-#Y(-!z(B $B!!(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(B $B!!#W(-#E(-#E(-#K(-#L(-#Y(-!y(B $B!!(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(B (B (B

Bug#169176: Please add biarch support for s390

2002-11-15 Thread Gerhard Tonn
Package: glibc Version: 2.3.1-3 Severity: wishlist Hi, we have decided not to introduce s390x as a seperate architecture. We would like to handle s390x on s390 as sparc64 on sparc. This means that we run 31 bit userland on a 64 bit kernel and add biarch support to the toolchain. This also

Bug#70762: textutils: tail segfault

2002-11-15 Thread Herbert Xu
H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But the original bug seems to be more of an issue: shouldn't it be a bug that tail chews up infinite amounts of memory when it can't find an end-of-line char? IMHO, tail should just bail out when it finds a line which is more than, say 10MB long (I'm being

Water Resources Textbook Software

2002-11-15 Thread Haestad Press
If you are unable to view the images in this email, please copy and paste the following url into your browser... http://www.haestad.com/books/wdm_021105 Visit http://www.haestad.com/comm_021105 to update communication preferences for

Bug#70762: textutils: tail segfault

2002-11-15 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 04:00, Herbert Xu wrote: But the original bug seems to be more of an issue: shouldn't it be a bug that tail chews up infinite amounts of memory when it can't find an end-of-line char? IMHO, tail should just bail out when it finds a line which is more than, say 10MB

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey

2002-11-15 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Fri Nov 15 06:48:27 MST 2002 Log Message: - debian/patches/s390x-lib64.dpatch: New file. Thanks to Gerhard Tonn. Closes: #169176, #166450. Note: CVS patch disabled for this upload Files: changed:

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by jbailey

2002-11-15 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:jbailey time: Fri Nov 15 06:48:27 MST 2002 Log Message: - debian/patches/s390x-lib64.dpatch: New file. Thanks to Gerhard Tonn. Closes: #169176, #166450. Note: CVS patch disabled for this upload Files: changed:

Bug#70762: textutils: tail segfault

2002-11-15 Thread H. S. Teoh
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:23:24AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 04:00, Herbert Xu wrote: But the original bug seems to be more of an issue: shouldn't it be a bug that tail chews up infinite amounts of memory when it can't find an end-of-line char? IMHO, tail should

Bug#169176: Please add biarch support for s390

2002-11-15 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 03:13, Gerhard Tonn wrote: we have decided not to introduce s390x as a seperate architecture. We would like to handle s390x on s390 as sparc64 on sparc. This means that we run 31 bit userland on a 64 bit kernel and add biarch support to the toolchain. This also means

Bug#151631: en_CA: LC_IDENTIFICATION: unknown character in field `address'

2002-11-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[David B Harris] Hey ho :) Following log should cover it, I think: Setting up locales (2.2.5-7) ... Generating locales... en_CA.ISO8859-1.../usr/share/i18n/locales/en_CA:27: LC_IDENTIFICATION: unknown character in field `address' done Generation complete. It works if I use 'en_CA

Bug#86761: locale.alias refers to non-generated locales

2002-11-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
The problem with 'locale -a' listing nonexisting locales was fixed in upstream CVS 2002-08-26. It made into release 2.3.1.

Bug#166979: Locales simply wont work

2002-11-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
It is safer to test using 'date', as this do not require external translation files. # locale-gen Generating locales... en_US.ISO-8859-1... done en_US.UTF-8... done es_ES.ISO-8859-1... done [EMAIL PROTECTED] done Generation complete. # date; LC_ALL=en_US date;

Where are the glibc 2.3.x source .deb's ?

2002-11-15 Thread Martin Baulig
Hi, is there any reason why we already have glibc 2.3.x binaries in sarge, but the latest source package is 2.2.5-14.3 ? I finally found the .diff.gz and the .orig.tar.gz in /pool/main/g/glibc, but /dists/sarge/main/source/Sources.gz still has 2.2.5-14.3. -- Martin Baulig [EMAIL PROTECTED]

redhat patches it...need for next glibc build

2002-11-15 Thread Jack Howarth
Jeff, Talking to Franz Sirl I just found out the real reason that RedHat doesn't suffer from OpenOffice aborting on the first launches like we do under debian glibc 2.3.1. It appears that they have been undoing the GLIBC_PRIVATE on __libc_wait and __libc_waitpid. Check a recent redhat glibc

Re: debian/patches review

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Fedrowitz
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:25:36PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: Hi, I'm just taking a look at this patch - Is this to work around a toolchain bug? Not a bug, a feature. ;) Why is this a problem on m68k and not anywhere else? Because m68k is one of the very few platforms where there's

Bug#70762: textutils: tail segfault

2002-11-15 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 08:10:22AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: Sure, but it would also be reasonable to flush the buffer to the screen every (screensize/2) so that a human could follow it. Tail can't do that until it finds the new lines... s/can't/doesn't/ ? Sounds like an upstream bug...

Bug#70762: textutils: tail segfault

2002-11-15 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:23:24AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 04:00, Herbert Xu wrote: But the original bug seems to be more of an issue: shouldn't it be a bug that tail chews up infinite amounts of memory when it can't find an end-of-line char? IMHO, tail should

UNSUBSCRIBE

2002-11-15 Thread SaRgE
- Original Message - From: Martin Baulig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-glibc@lists.debian.org Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 5:43 PM Subject: Where are the glibc 2.3.x source .deb's ? Hi, is there any reason why we already have glibc 2.3.x binaries in sarge, but the latest source

Bug#70762: textutils: tail segfault

2002-11-15 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:22:44PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 08:10:22AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: Sure, but it would also be reasonable to flush the buffer to the screen every (screensize/2) so that a human could follow it. Tail can't do that until it finds the

$B"##M#L#M<:GT<T$N5U=1!*"#(B

2002-11-15 Thread mailmag 2 $B%S%8%M%9>pJs6I(B
$B!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!(B (B $B!!#W(-#E(-#E(-#K(-#L(-#Y(-!z(B $B!!(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(B $B!!#W(-#E(-#E(-#K(-#L(-#Y(-!y(B $B!!(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(B (B (B