At 03 Sep 2003 00:09:52 +0100,
Philip Blundell wrote:
>
> I'm about to build a 2.3.2-5 package. This will include a fix for the
> NSS nis_compat/shadow password bug, plus a variety of more minor
> issues. The full changelog is below.
Thanks! It fixes more RC bugs :)
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 05:17:28PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:15:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > You ground your argument on "second hand reports of clarifications" in
> > the first quoted paragraph, but then expect debian-legal to furnish
> > first-hand clarif
I just confirmed that tail doesn't segfault anymore. This is on:
ii libc6 2.3.2-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii coreutils 5.0.90-3 The GNU core utilities
Can the bug submitter confirm that this has been fixed?
T
--
"Life is all a great joke, but
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 19:13, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Still happens with libc6 2.3.2-5 and nfs-kernel-server 1.0.5-2.
Do you have a recipe for reproducing it?
p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I couldn't reproduce this problem in a quick test with glibc
>> 2.3.2-4 and nfs-kernel-server 1.0.5-2. Is it still happening for
>> you guys?
>
> I'm on vacation for a few days, I'll test it when I'm
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm currently looking into why the glibc 2.3.2-5 fails to build on hppa.
> I know almost nothing about hppa at the moment but patch as so far
> attached. I'm currently struggling with __NR_ipc undefined. I can't find
> this sys
Hi,
I'm currently looking into why the glibc 2.3.2-5 fails to build on hppa.
I know almost nothing about hppa at the moment but patch as so far
attached. I'm currently struggling with __NR_ipc undefined. I can't find
this syscall in the asm/unistd.h of 2.4.19. Isn't this implemented on
parisc?
Rega
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 206663
Bug#206663: glibc: some GNU/KFreeBSD fixes
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
reopen 206663
thanks
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:48:37PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #206663: glibc: some GNU/KFreeBSD fixes,
> which was filed against the glibc package.
>
> It has been closed by one of the developers, n
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:15:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> You ground your argument on "second hand reports of clarifications" in
> the first quoted paragraph, but then expect debian-legal to furnish
> first-hand clarifications?
Yes. If you're too lazy to be bothered doing that, don't exp
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:48:12AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #208639: locale: Leave.alone...cannot open locale definition file `Leave': No such
> file,
> which was filed against the locales package.
>
[ bug closed E-m
Your message dated Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:40:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#208639: locale: Leave.alone...cannot open locale definition file
`Leave': No such file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 208639 locales
Bug#208639: locale: Leave.alone...cannot open locale definition file `Leave': No such
file
Warning: Unknown package 'locale'
Bug reassigned from package `locale' to `locales'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
reassign 208639 locales
thanks
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:43:42AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Package: locale
> Version: 2.3.2-4
> Severity: important
>
> Output from apt-get install locale:
> Unpacking locales (from .../locales_2.3.2-4_all.deb) ...
> Setting up locales (2.3.2-4) ...
> Generat
~
Regarding your recent e-mail to Macromedia:
Macromedia recently received an e-mail, from this e-mail
address, that we are unable to process. Additional actions
may be required to fulfill your particular comments or request.
We have provi
Your message dated Thu, 04 Sep 2003 02:11:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
16 matches
Mail list logo
