On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:04:53AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
awk is provided by mawk which is not essential.
Santiago Vila has said a number of times in the past that awk is a
virtual essential package: you have to have one implementation of it,
even though neither is itself essential, and
Tobias writes:
Attached is a small script that shows the difference between the too.
Personally I think the tcsh is better sorted because of the difference
between A and a.
bash's behaviour is different than tcsh, dash, zsh, ksh.
bash --norc
LANG=sv_SE
power-post-setup.bmp
ls: [A-Z][A-Z]*:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:26:35 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Ãric Racine wrote:
That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the
At Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:17:52 +0100,
Simon Richter wrote:
I recently upgraded libc6 on a few boxen, but rebooted only some of them
since. I think it may be a good idea to check in the postinst whether
/dev/shm is already mounted and mount it if not.
It's already done in libc6.postinst.
tag 229461 pending
thanks
On Sun, 2004-01-25 at 04:05, Bastian Blank wrote:
Can you give me the steps to reproduce?
Unpack libc6 before mawk is configured. mawk depends against libc6.
base-files is
essential and depends on awk.
Okay,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 229461 pending
Bug#229461: libc6 - fails to install - uses awk in preinst
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:23:20AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
Carlos, could you look at this report?
Regards,
-- gotom
Richard,
Can you try out these changes and tell me if this fixes the issue?
http://www.parisc-linux.org/~carlos/glibc-2.3.2-debs-2004-01-25/
It's against glibc
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:27:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Cannot reproduce anymore, closing this bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:37:15 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in -11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:31:37 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line -11 solves this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:04:53AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
awk is provided by mawk which is not essential.
Santiago Vila has said a number of times in the past that awk is a
virtual essential package: you have to have one implementation of it,
even though neither is itself essential, and
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 09:31:37PM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
Can you give me the steps to reproduce?
Unpack libc6 before mawk is configured. mawk depends against libc6.
base-files is
essential and depends on awk.
Essential packages needs to
Tobias writes:
Attached is a small script that shows the difference between the too.
Personally I think the tcsh is better sorted because of the difference
between A and a.
bash's behaviour is different than tcsh, dash, zsh, ksh.
bash --norc
LANG=sv_SE
power-post-setup.bmp
ls: [A-Z][A-Z]*:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Tobias writes:
Attached is a small script that shows the difference between the too.
Personally I think the tcsh is better sorted because of the difference
between A and a.
bash's behaviour is different than tcsh, dash,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:26:35 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:09:27 +0200 (EET),
Martin-Ãric Racine wrote:
That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the
Thank you for your reply. I guess the bug here is not that I can't build this
one program. It's
that ioctl information needs to be taken from the right header files. As time
goes on this
problem will get more and more important. I wonder how vary old 2.2 or 2.1
kernels deal with the
Colin Watson writes:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Tobias writes:
Attached is a small script that shows the difference between the too.
Personally I think the tcsh is better sorted because of the difference
between A and a.
bash's behaviour is
I have gained succsess with 2.4.24-1-k7. Both 2.6.0 and test9 have the same
problem. I will try
my best to use 2.4 untill this gets fixed. I did not have to recompile just
boot with the older
kernel.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site
At Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:17:52 +0100,
Simon Richter wrote:
I recently upgraded libc6 on a few boxen, but rebooted only some of them
since. I think it may be a good idea to check in the postinst whether
/dev/shm is already mounted and mount it if not.
It's already done in libc6.postinst.
tag 229461 pending
thanks
On Sun, 2004-01-25 at 04:05, Bastian Blank wrote:
Can you give me the steps to reproduce?
Unpack libc6 before mawk is configured. mawk depends against libc6.
base-files is
essential and depends on awk.
Okay,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 229461 pending
Bug#229461: libc6 - fails to install - uses awk in preinst
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Sun Jan 25 11:06:29 MST 2004
Log Message:
* Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst: Don't use awk except in
upgrade mode. (Closes: #229461)
Thanks to Bastian Blank [EMAIL
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:jbailey
time: Sun Jan 25 11:06:29 MST 2004
Log Message:
* Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst: Don't use awk except in
upgrade mode. (Closes: #229461)
Thanks to Bastian Blank
Matthias Klose wrote:
Colin Watson writes:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Tobias writes:
Attached is a small script that shows the difference between the too.
Personally I think the tcsh is better sorted because of the difference
between A and a.
bash's behaviour
Generic viagra, at cheap prices.
Most places charge $20, we charge $3. Quite a difference, huh?
An amazing erection WITHIN SEVERAL SECONDS is guaranteed to you!
Go into sexual overdrive today... vrm!
Shipped worldwide.
Your easy to use solution is here:
Generic viagra, at cheap prices.
Most places charge $20, we charge $3. Quite a difference, huh?
An amazing erection WITHIN SEVERAL SECONDS is guaranteed to you!
Go into sexual overdrive today... vrm!
Shipped worldwide.
Your easy to use solution is here:
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Sun Jan 25 15:49:28 MST 2004
Log Message:
Note that last commit also fixes 196382. Thanks to waldi for
stalking^Wpointing it out.
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:jbailey
time: Sun Jan 25 17:20:58 MST 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.docs: Add TODO.
Hopefully the last round of hurd-i386 fixes:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc-dev.install.hurd-i386: New file.
-
Repository: glibc-package/debian/sysdeps
who:jbailey
time: Sun Jan 25 17:20:58 MST 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.docs: Add TODO.
Hopefully the last round of hurd-i386 fixes:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc-dev.install.hurd-i386: New file.
-
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:jbailey
time: Sun Jan 25 17:20:58 MST 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.docs: Add TODO.
Hopefully the last round of hurd-i386 fixes:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc-dev.install.hurd-i386: New file.
-
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:jbailey
time: Sun Jan 25 17:20:58 MST 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.docs: Add TODO.
Hopefully the last round of hurd-i386 fixes:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc-dev.install.hurd-i386: New file.
-
Repository: glibc-package/debian/rules.d
who:jbailey
time: Sun Jan 25 17:20:58 MST 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.docs: Add TODO.
Hopefully the last round of hurd-i386 fixes:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc-dev.install.hurd-i386: New file.
-
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:23:20AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
Carlos, could you look at this report?
Regards,
-- gotom
Richard,
Can you try out these changes and tell me if this fixes the issue?
http://www.parisc-linux.org/~carlos/glibc-2.3.2-debs-2004-01-25/
It's against glibc
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:27:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Cannot reproduce anymore, closing this bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:37:15 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in -11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:31:37 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line -11 solves this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:31:37 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line -11 solves this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
The ldconfig behaviour is intentional AFAICT. It seems to come from the
following upstream ChangeLog entries:
2003-08-26 Jakub Jelinek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* elf/ldconfig.c (search_dir): When checking for
At Sun, 21 Dec 2003 01:22:04 +0100,
Alberto Mardegan wrote:
[ia]
Per favor adde le file de definition pro interlingua, juncte a iste
email.
[en]
Please add interlingua definition file, attached to this email.
I don't know well about Interlingua, but is this generic language,
right? If so,
At Fri, 26 Dec 2003 13:48:00 +0100,
Oskar Liljeblad wrote:
According to the thread http://www.knoppix.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4660
downgrading sysvinit would help.
Even if your bugs are related to sysvinit or glibc, it seems all these
kinds of bugs are vmware related. Please contact to
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:58:43 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#51242: libc6: WISH: mount devpts after mountall in
/etc/rcS.d
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:59:17 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#225513: libc6: strftime display today (30 Dec 2003) a year
2004
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
At Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:21:39 +,
Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ENOTSUP is the same as EOPNOTSUPP.
Because linux kernel does not distinct both, moreover they don't
return ENOTSUP.
SUSv3 requires these two values to be
distinct, even though no function uses both of them. The
43 matches
Mail list logo
