Bug#263601: m68k: workaround for binutils problem

2004-08-05 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, The new binutils 2.15 package combined with newer gcc releases might expose a longstanding binutils problem, it's discussed here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-08/msg00535.html I'm running tests with newer gcc and

Re: Failed ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

2004-08-05 Thread contact
Due to the amount of e-mails we get a day, we have setup this autoresponder for your convenience. Your questions may be answered at these URLs: Visitor Questions: http://www.anime100.com/faq_v.shtml Webmaster Questions: http://www.anime100.com/faq_wm.shtml If you have further questions and

Re: libc6-dbg

2004-08-05 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 4 Aug 2004 01:49:54 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Selon Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:53:54PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: Hi, At Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:32:34 +0200 (CEST), Fabien Carrion wrote: I got a little suggestion for the

Re: libc6-dbg

2004-08-05 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 3 Aug 2004 13:17:54 -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 01:48:34PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: - -gdwarf-2 -g3 It's good idea for me. I don't know we can use DWARF2 level3 on all architectures, though. Daniel, how about adding this option? If it's

Re: scsi include files and cdrecord

2004-08-05 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:50:18 +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: there's currently a discussion about compiling the cdrtools started from Joerg Schilling in a german newsgroup (de.comp.hardware.laufwerke.brenner). Well, Joerg suggested that one should modify some linux-scsi-include files to be able

Re: Not Recieved a Reply Yet

2004-08-05 Thread Louella Queen
Dear Home Bu y e r: Congratulations! You have been pre - appr.oved for a new home mortga g e. Below are the specifications of your approv a l Lo a n Type: Conventional Interest Ra t e: 3.5% Term: 360 months Sales Price: $250,000 (Maximum) Down Paym e n t: 10% Lock-in Period: 45 days Closing

Processed: Re: [PATCH] Fix insufficient message buffer size when hitting unknown command (Re: Bug#256725: sed segfaults on invalid scripts such as 'm')

2004-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 256725 sed Bug#256725: sed segfaults on invalid scripts such as 'm' Bug reassigned from package `locales' to `sed'. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#256725: [PATCH] Fix insufficient message buffer size when hitting unknown command (Re: Bug#256725: sed segfaults on invalid scripts such as 'm')

2004-08-05 Thread GOTO Masanori
Hi Paolo, This patch fixes the bug raised at Debian project at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=256725 To reappear the bug: $ LANG=C sed --version GNU sed version 4.1.1 Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free

Bug#256725: [PATCH] Fix insufficient message buffer size when hitting unknown command (Re: Bug#256725: sed segfaults on invalid scripts such as 'm')

2004-08-05 Thread Clint Adams
reassign 256725 sed quit This patch fixes the bug raised at Debian project at: Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#263601: raise severity of #263601

2004-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 263601 + serious thanks according to Dan binutils won't be fixed/cannot be fixed for sarge. Please apply this workaround. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: raise severity of #263601

2004-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 263601 serious Bug#263601: m68k: workaround for binutils problem Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs