On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 10:04:24AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> That would be libc-alpha. But it's not a very helpful list.
Daniel, thanks for the response and the information.
Whoops, I thought libc-alpha was for DEC Alpha systems.
> Use -B$prefix/lib/ instead. You may also want -rpath-l
H. J. Lu writes:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > H. J. Lu writes:
> > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:16:56AM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:01:33 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > > > > PROTECTED]> said:
> > > >
> > > >
> And while you're at it - what about submitting a kernel patch to add
> sys_utimes on parisc?
willy and i talked about this yesterday. i'll commit this directly to
the parisc tree.
randolph
--
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports
http://www.tausq.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 05:45:13PM -0800, Chris Ruvolo wrote:
> Hello all. This is a general glibc question, and does not have to deal with
> Debian directly. Sorry for the off-topic posting, but I don't know of
> another open forum for glibc discussion (libc-hackers being closed).
That would be
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 01:52:03PM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> tag 284449 +patch
> thanks
>
> This patch fixes the utimes() problem on hppa -- the cvs patch applied
> to debian's glibc has a bug in it. tested against 2.3.2.ds1-19
And while you're at it - what about submitting a kernel patch to
5 matches
Mail list logo