Re: linking against an older glibc?

2004-12-10 Thread Chris Ruvolo
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 10:04:24AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > That would be libc-alpha. But it's not a very helpful list. Daniel, thanks for the response and the information. Whoops, I thought libc-alpha was for DEC Alpha systems. > Use -B$prefix/lib/ instead. You may also want -rpath-l

Bug#284563: libunwind in unstable

2004-12-10 Thread Matthias Klose
H. J. Lu writes: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > H. J. Lu writes: > > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:16:56AM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:01:33 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > > > > PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > > > >

Bug#284449: [patch/hppa] fix utimes() for hppa

2004-12-10 Thread Randolph Chung
> And while you're at it - what about submitting a kernel patch to add > sys_utimes on parisc? willy and i talked about this yesterday. i'll commit this directly to the parisc tree. randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: linking against an older glibc?

2004-12-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 05:45:13PM -0800, Chris Ruvolo wrote: > Hello all. This is a general glibc question, and does not have to deal with > Debian directly. Sorry for the off-topic posting, but I don't know of > another open forum for glibc discussion (libc-hackers being closed). That would be

Bug#284449: [patch/hppa] fix utimes() for hppa

2004-12-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 01:52:03PM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote: > tag 284449 +patch > thanks > > This patch fixes the utimes() problem on hppa -- the cvs patch applied > to debian's glibc has a bug in it. tested against 2.3.2.ds1-19 And while you're at it - what about submitting a kernel patch to