On 2005-02-28 10:12:14 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:37:25 +0100,
> Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > The getgrname(3) man page says:
> >
> > The getgrnam() function returns a pointer to a structure containing the
> > group information from /etc/group for the entry that matches
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:40:33 +0100,
> Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> Package: linux-kernel-headers
>> Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-17
>> Severity: critical
>> File: linux-kernel-header
>> Justification: breaks the whole system
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when one tries t
El Lunes, 28 de Febrero de 2005 02:23, GOTO Masanori escribiÃ:
> At Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:36:23 +0100,
>
> David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xmms
> > libmikmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/d
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:23:14AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:36:23 +0100,
> David Mart?nez Moreno wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xmms
> > libmikmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:17:29 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278426: libc6: memcpy problem is gone, close bug?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
At Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:36:23 +0100,
David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xmms
> libmikmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72:
> _dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result <= _rtld_local._dl_tl
At Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:37:25 +0100,
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> The getgrname(3) man page says:
>
> The getgrnam() function returns a pointer to a structure containing the
> group information from /etc/group for the entry that matches the group
> name name.
>
> But here, the getgrname functio
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:17:44PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> While there hasn't been any discussion for glibc bugzilla report #685
> [1], private communication with one of the glibc maintainers indicates
> that this issue is not considered to be a glibc bug because,
> officially, glibc suppor
At Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:30:23 +0100,
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > While I'm at it, something VERY important that slept out in this
> > > discussionï: the list of supported languages for sarge is
> > > *closed*. For size constraints, and for being
tags 295618 woody
thanks
At Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:52:10 +1300,
John R. McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Debian stable, with 2.6 kernel)
>
> /etc/init.d/devpts.sh contains the following:
>
> ##
> devpts_avail=`grep -qci '[<[:space:]]devpts' /proc/filesystems || true`
> devpts_mounted=`grep -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 295618 woody
Bug#295618: broken /etc/init.d/devpts.sh script won't work
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:40:44 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296490: libc6: getgrnam segfault (using __nscd_getgrnam_r)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
At Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:17:44 -0800,
David Mosberger wrote:
> While there hasn't been any discussion for glibc bugzilla report #685
> [1], private communication with one of the glibc maintainers indicates
> that this issue is not considered to be a glibc bug because,
> officially, glibc supports onl
At Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:40:33 +0100,
Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Package: linux-kernel-headers
> Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-17
> Severity: critical
> File: linux-kernel-header
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Hi,
>
> when one tries to run pvmove or lvsnapshot on / the lvm will deadlock
>
At Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:50:48 +0100,
Daniele Cruciani wrote:
> I do want to build glibc setting kernel minimal version to 2.4.0
> (2.4.22 .. does matter last digit??), and compile it with flags for my
> machine (PIII).
>
> (I actually use kernel 2.6.10)
>
> Will I fall in any trouble?
It depends
On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 17:04 +0100, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote (August 21, 2004 - half a year ago):
>
> > > > > If not now, then when do you expect this to be in unstable?
> > > >
> > > > Personal judgement: With about 90% probability after the first release
> > > > of
> > >
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote (August 21, 2004 - half a year ago):
> > > > If not now, then when do you expect this to be in unstable?
> > >
> > > Personal judgement: With about 90% probability after the first release of
> > > sarge.
> > >
> >
> > I was looking for a timeframe. Weeks, months, years? T
17 matches
Mail list logo
