Bug#305714: marked as done (gethostby*.getanswer: ... got type "39")

Your message dated Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:05:20 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#305714: gethostby*.getanswer: ... got type "39" has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#305714: gethostby*.getanswer: ... got type "39"

Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-20 i've started seeing entries like this in my syslog: Apr 21 09:48:06 twinlark curl: gethostby*.getanswer: asked for "ethereal.net.nyud.net IN A", got type "39" type 39 is a DNAME record , and DNAMEs are apparently in use

r901 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian: . debhelper.in sysdeps

Author: gotom Date: 2005-04-21 16:23:50 + (Thu, 21 Apr 2005) New Revision: 901 Removed: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/debhelper.in/libc-prof.manpages Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/debhelper.in/libc-d

Bug#270797: marked as done (libc6: sched affinity library calls and manpages do not match)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Apr 2005 01:26:59 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#270797: libc6: sched affinity library calls and manpages do not match has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#293154: marked as done (/usr/include/pthread.h: No valid ANSI C)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Apr 2005 01:07:02 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#293154: /usr/include/pthread.h: No valid ANSI C has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#302892: Processed: Re: Bug#302892: clamav-daemon: clamd segfaults on a 2.6.9 u-m-l

> "gotom" == GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'm not sure whether this is a a libc problem but using >> Bytemark's 2.6.9 and 2.4.26 user mode linux kernels with Debian >> testing causes threaded applications to segfault. gotom> IIRC, this is not glibc problem - th

Bug#302892: Processed: Re: Bug#302892: clamav-daemon: clamd segfaults on a 2.6.9 u-m-l

> I'm not sure whether this is a a libc problem but using Bytemark's > 2.6.9 and 2.4.26 user mode linux kernels with Debian testing causes > threaded applications to segfault. IIRC, this is not glibc problem - the actual fault is UML does not support tls (/lib/tls). With 2.6 kernel, glibc dynamic

Bug#288710: setfacl with many files at cmdline -> Too many open files

tags 288710 confirmed fixed-upstream thanks At Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:48:16 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > > Maybe should this bug be untagged "upstream" then ? > > Since its working on other versions of glibc (ie SLES9), odds are > its an upstream bug anyway (maybe not, but probably). At this > stage

Processed: Re: Bug#288710: setfacl with many files at cmdline -> Too many open files

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 288710 confirmed fixed-upstream Bug#288710: setfacl with many files at cmdline -> Too many open files Tags were: upstream Tags added: confirmed, fixed-upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian b

r900 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian: . local/usr_sbin

Author: gotom Date: 2005-04-21 15:40:08 + (Thu, 21 Apr 2005) New Revision: 900 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/local/usr_sbin/locale-gen Log: * Fix messages to add a patience message. (Closes: #305400) - d

Bug#305400: locales should print a patience message

At Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:08:57 +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote: > after a dpkg-reconfigure locales, it prints the > Generating locales... > message. > When configuring complex locales such as zh_CN*, this process will take > almost 5 minutes on my P3/700! > > Thus you might want to change this message int

Bug#305666: 'man tzconfig' typos: "privilegies", "reliablility" and "truely"

At Thu, 21 Apr 2005 04:51:12 -0400, A Costa wrote: > Found some typos in '/usr/share/man/man8/tzconfig.8.gz', see attached '.diff'. Thanks! I put your two fixes, it should be appeared at glibc 2.3.5-2. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

r899 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian: . local/manpages

Author: gotom Date: 2005-04-21 15:33:37 + (Thu, 21 Apr 2005) New Revision: 899 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/local/manpages/ldconfig.8 glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/local/manpages/tzconfig.8 Log:

r898 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian: . debhelper.in

Author: gotom Date: 2005-04-21 11:40:00 + (Thu, 21 Apr 2005) New Revision: 898 Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/debhelper.in/libc.docs Log: * Add documents: - debian/debhelper.in/libc.docs: Add CONFORMANCE a

r897 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian: . debhelper.in local/manpages local/usr_sbin

Author: gotom Date: 2005-04-21 11:36:31 + (Thu, 21 Apr 2005) New Revision: 897 Removed: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/debhelper.in/locales.links Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.3.4/debian/debhelper.in/locales.ins

Bug#304022: libc6: getaddrinfo/freeaddrinfo leaks memory

tags 304022 fixed-upstream confirmed thanks > The simple C program above triggers a memory leak in > getaddrinfo/freeaddrinfo(). The problem can be noticed by watching the > memory footprint rise with top or, by running the program through > valgrind. I confirmed that it's exactly glibc bug. Not

Processed: Re: libc6: getaddrinfo/freeaddrinfo leaks memory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 304022 fixed-upstream confirmed Bug#304022: libc6: getaddrinfo/freeaddrinfo leaks memory There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream, confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracki

Bug#219356: marked as done (libc6: i586 optimized libs)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:01:23 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219356: libc6: i586 optimized libs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#305666: 'man tzconfig' typos: "privilegies", "reliablility" and "truely"

Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-21 Severity: minor Tags: patch Found some typos in '/usr/share/man/man8/tzconfig.8.gz', see attached '.diff'. Hope this helps... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture:

Bug#217224: marked as done (libc6-dev: strftime can not return locale-compliant time string without seconds)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:53:00 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#217224: libc6-dev: strftime can not return locale-compliant time string without seconds has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#305662: 'man ldconfig' typo: "spearated"

Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-21 Severity: minor Tags: patch Found a typo in '/usr/share/man/man8/ldconfig.8.gz', see attached '.diff'. Hope this helps... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i38

Bug#213503: Fixed patch (knetbsd-gnu)

Hi! At Thu, 9 Oct 2003 15:22:08 +, Robert Millan wrote: > After some off-list clarification by Jeff, I could finish my patch. Here's > the revised version which also fixes Build-Dependencies for kfreebsd-gnu. > > It's differed against current CVS, btw. Is knetbsd-gnu still maintained? If so

Bug#212353: libc6.1-dev: please stop providing "libc6-dev"

At Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:45:04 +, Robert Millan wrote: > Please could you remove "libc6-dev" from the Provides line in the libc6.1-dev > package? > > The Debian package-set should be aware that libc-dev is not libc6-dev and > stop depending on libc6-dev unconditionaly. Providing this dirty hack

Bug#224207: marked as done (libc6-i686: Doesn't work with kernel 2.4 + nptl patch)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:25:31 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#224248: Setting severity to wishlist, tagging wontfix has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#224366: marked as done (libc6-dev: .so symlinks point to nowhere)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:17:01 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#224366: Relative links vs. symlinks. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Re: Good results with libc6 snapshot

At Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:28:31 -0500, Art Haas wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:42:42AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > OK, after my 2.3.2.ds1-21 work for the last stuff for sarge, I'll put > > 2.3.5 into experimental. Thanks for your testing and checking! > > Hi. > > I saw that 2.3.5 was out,

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 302458 fixed-upstream Bug#302458: libc6-dev: ceill and floorl on amd64 return wrong result in (-1, 0) There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trac