Bug#119974: Hey sexy,,...,,ak

2005-07-30 Thread Sarah Bear Greene
Hey my man.this is Sarah. Where are u going tonight? I hope we can talk some more later or something. Hey u can check out some of my pics here if u want. Take it easy. http://qhqwrq.supersocketcoat.com/sa16/ vmEYcwM4YLsSrnt3y91 pass-supersocketcoat.com/1m/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#134097: Take care.

2005-07-30 Thread Sarah Bear
YO YO.This is Sarah. Just see whats new? I hope we can talk some more later or something. Hey u can check out some of my pics here if u want. Talk to you soon. http://ginwx.supersocketcoat.com/sa16/ p1JUiJAvPhTuOqgS nah-supersocketcoat.com/1m/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320515: linux-kernel-headers: Also affects xorg-x11

2005-07-30 Thread Eugene Konev
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.6.13+0rc3-1 Followup-For: Bug #320515 This bug also affects xorg-x11, which FTBFS with current l-k-h as some input drivers #include linux/joystick.h -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500,

Bug#320630: libc6-dev: /usr/include/sys/socket.h broken with g++ 4.x

2005-07-30 Thread Jaakko Niemi
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.5-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch /usr/include/sys/socket.h has the definitions of SHUT_* in a anonymous enum. g++ 4 started enforcing C++ standard part which forbids using anonymous enums as template arguments. Please see the thread starting with:

Bug#320630: libc6-dev: /usr/include/sys/socket.h broken with g++ 4.x

2005-07-30 Thread Jaakko Niemi
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Please see the thread starting with: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01486.html for more discussion about this. So, please just ditch the enum and leave #defines. No, changing headers that way is a bad idea. Fix

Re: Bug#320630: libc6-dev: /usr/include/sys/socket.h broken with g++ 4.x

2005-07-30 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 10:01:14PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: On Sat, 2005-07-30 22:07:42 +0300, Jaakko Niemi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01486.html for more discussion about this. So,