Bug#321712: libc6: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_dns.so.2: symbol __res_maybe_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE

Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.5-3 Severity: important Hi! I was taking a look at my Apache error's log and I found this: /usr/sbin/apache: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_dns.so.2: symbol __res_maybe_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference

Bug#321719: libc6: locale -a returns values even if locales package is not installed

Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22 Severity: normal Hi, $ locale -a locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory C POSIX de_DE de_DE.iso88591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] de_DE.utf8 [EMAIL PROTECTED] deutsch german $ dpkg --list locales

Processed: Re: Bug#321719: libc6: locale -a returns values even if locales package is not installed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found #321719 2.3.5-3 Bug#321719: libc6: locale -a returns values even if locales package is not installed Bug marked as found in version 2.3.5-3. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#321719: libc6: locale -a returns values even if locales package is not installed

found #321719 2.3.5-3 thanks On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 09:43:06AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22 Severity: normal Actually, the system I have found that bug on runs 2.3.5-3. I cannot verify wether 2.3.2.ds1-22 actually has the bug since I do not have a 2.3.2

Re: Bug#321718: Upgrade caused many libs to complain about executable stack

reassign 321717 glibc 2.3.5-1 reassign 321718 glibc 2.3.5-1 reassign 321720 glibc 2.3.5-1 reassign 321721 glibc 2.3.5-1 reassign 321723 glibc 2.3.5-1 reassign 321724 glibc 2.3.5-1 merge 321718 321717 321720 321721 321723 321724 severity 321718 important thanks On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:56:10AM

Processed: Re: Bug#321718: Upgrade caused many libs to complain about executable stack

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 321717 glibc 2.3.5-1 Bug#321717: cannot enable executable stack as shared object requires: Error 14 Bug reassigned from package `libacl1' to `glibc'. reassign 321718 glibc 2.3.5-1 Bug#321718: Upgrade caused many libs to complain about

Re: Bug#321718: Upgrade caused many libs to complain about executable stack

On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 01:51 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Google suggests this has something to do with pax, which I've never heard of and have certainly never installed or enabled. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers stable APT policy: (500,

Bug#321740: glibc-doc: html documentation missing due to incorrect path in build process

Package: glibc-doc Version: 2.3.5-3 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, the documentation in HTML format is missing due to a wrong path in debian/debhelper.in/glibc-doc.install. See attached patch. bye, Roland -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT

Bug#321718: Upgrade caused many libs to complain about executable stack

On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 01:51:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: reassign 321717 glibc 2.3.5-1 reassign 321718 glibc 2.3.5-1 reassign 321720 glibc 2.3.5-1 reassign 321721 glibc 2.3.5-1 reassign 321723 glibc 2.3.5-1 reassign 321724 glibc 2.3.5-1 merge 321718 321717 321720 321721 321723 321724

Bug#320240: ucontext.h bug also breaks libgc build

Ian Wienand wrote: On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:58:32PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: If glibc in unstable doesn't require significant fixes to build with gcc-4.0, it really would be a good idea to backport the fix for this bug and the rpc/xdr.h one. I started to try this but gave up quite

Processed: Re: Bug#321718: Upgrade caused many libs to complain about executable stack

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unmerge 321724 Bug#321724: cannot enable executable stack as shared object requires: Error 14 Bug#321717: cannot enable executable stack as shared object requires: Error 14 Bug#321718: Upgrade caused many libs to complain about executable stack

Bug#321718: Upgrade caused many libs to complain about executable stack

unmerge 321724 reassign 321724 libelfg0 0.8.5-1 unmerge 321723 reassign 321723 libgdbm3 1.8.3-2 unmerge 321721 reassign 321721 libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 severity 321721 minor unmerge 321720 reassign 321720 libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11.1 severity 321720 minor thanks On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:28:41AM +0200,

Bug#320515: NMU diff for l-k-h bug #320515

* Adeodato Simó [Thu, 04 Aug 2005 02:14:39 +0200]: Do you have an approximate idea when an upload could happen? Depending on your timing, I'd like to adjust the upload of qt-x11-free. Also, wouldn't the attached patch be enough? FWIW, xorg-x11 builds fine with it applied. Is there

Bug#288748: marked as done (zgv: FTBFS with gcc-4.0: invalid lvalue in assignment)

Your message dated Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:51:08 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line zgv: #288748-done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#320244: marked as done (glibc crashes in execvp())

Your message dated Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:20:47 +0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#321712: libc6: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_dns.so.2: symbol __res_maybe_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE

On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 03:59:09AM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.5-3 Severity: important Hi! I was taking a look at my Apache error's log and I found this: /usr/sbin/apache: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_dns.so.2: symbol

Processed: severity of 321743 is serious, reassign 321743 to linux-kernel-headers, merging 320515 321743

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 severity 321743 serious Bug#321743: Xorg fails to build with new linux-kernel-headers Severity set to `serious'. reassign 321743 linux-kernel-headers Bug#321743: Xorg fails to build

Fixed in NMU of linux-kernel-headers 2.6.13+0rc3-1.1

tag 320515 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:57:42 +0200 Source: linux-kernel-headers Binary: linux-kernel-headers

Bug#321796: libc6 errors with libphp4.so after recent libc6 update

Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.5-3 Severity: important I was reading bug 321712 and am seeing the same output in my /var/log/apache/error.log for failing to load libphp4 into the running server with the message below: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so into server:

Processing of linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1_i386.changes

linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1.dsc linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1.diff.gz linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon --

Processed: Fixed in NMU of linux-kernel-headers 2.6.13+0rc3-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 320515 + fixed Bug#320515: BITS_PER_LONG used unconditionally but defined only if __KERNEL__ is defined Tags were: patch Bug#321263: libc6-dev: broken header file: linux/joystick.h Bug#321743: Xorg fails to build with new linux-kernel-headers Tags

Number ONE home based program

Hello Maryanne Rhoades, Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone calls? I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for this program. Give Us A Call 888 238 3164 bolt marquis alabama moonlit linguist montevideo

linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-headers/linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1.diff.gz linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-headers/linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1.dsc

Bug#321712: libc6: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_dns.so.2: symbol __res_maybe_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE

Hi! On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: I was taking a look at my Apache error's log and I found this: /usr/sbin/apache: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_dns.so.2: symbol __res_maybe_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference

Processed: merge w/ glibc bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 319772 libc6.1-dev Bug#319772: dx: FTBFS Bug reassigned from package `dx' to `libc6.1-dev'. severity 319772 grave Bug#319772: dx: FTBFS Severity set to `grave'. tags 319772 + patch Bug#319772: dx: FTBFS There were no tags set. Tags added:

Processed: retitle 181494 to [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1olisfcbc] includes non-free documentation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 retitle 181494 [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1olisfcbc] includes non-free documentation Bug#181494: GNU Free Documentation License is non-free Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping

Processed: tagging 181494

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 tags 181494 - sarge sid Bug#181494: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1olisfcbc] includes non-free documentation Tags were: sarge-ignore sid sarge woody Tags removed: sarge, sid End of message,

Processed: tagging 181494

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 tags 181494 - woody Bug#181494: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1olisfcbc] includes non-free documentation Tags were: sarge-ignore woody Tags removed: woody End of message, stopping processing

Bug#321712: libc6: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_dns.so.2: symbol __res_maybe_init, version GLIBC_PRIVATE

On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 01:29:19PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: They are both version 2.3.5-3 Recently I have upgraded from version 2.3.2.ds1-22 as soon as 2.3.5 hit unstable. I just upgraded libc6 and didn't restart Apache after upgrade. Should I restart? Taking a look at the