Re: Bug#329108: gcc-4.0 FTBFS on, uh, i386

GOTO Masanori writes: > At Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:27:15 +0200, > Matthias Klose wrote: > > > On the latest i386 Sid, gcc-4.0 does not build from source, on my machine, > > > and on a buildd (see the logs). With dash as sh, I get: > > > > this is known, we're waiting on proper 64bit support from glibc

Bug#329785: marked as done (libc6: dirname() fails with sig11 on amd64 (x86_64))

Your message dated Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:10:29 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329785: libc6: dirname() fails with sig11 on amd64 (x86_64) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Re: Bug#329108: gcc-4.0 FTBFS on, uh, i386

At Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:27:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On the latest i386 Sid, gcc-4.0 does not build from source, on my machine, > > and on a buildd (see the logs). With dash as sh, I get: > > this is known, we're waiting on proper 64bit support from glibc. I'd > like to downgrade this one

Bug#329785: libc6: dirname() fails with sig11 on amd64 (x86_64)

Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22 Severity: normal As already assumed in bug #329719 the dirname()-function is erroneous, at least on amd64: it ends up with sig11 (segfault). If you want to reproduce the problem, compile and run this