Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-07-28 08:20:46 + (Sat, 28 Jul 2007)
New Revision: 2470
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/alpha.mk
Log:
*
Subject: libc6.1-dev: [alpha] unistd.h does not contain exit() prototype
Package: libc6.1-dev
Version: 2.6-4
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat exittest.c
#include unistd.h
int main ()
{
exit(0);
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LANG=C gcc -o
hey Roos,
I'm new in all these. I subscribed to the mailing list hopefully}
that I could be useful in something. Is there a way I can help with the
exit() function. I mean could you give me the appropriate file to add
the exit() function? I will try at least. Check from stdlib and I think i
may do
You reported a bug with glibc 2.3 in older Debian versions. Is this
still happening with current stable (etch) or oldstable (sarge)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
tags 224855 - sid
Bug#224855: atlas2-base-dev: alternatives are broken
Tags were: sid
Bug#225397: ldconfig installs link which gcc cannot use
Bug#227308: lapack: too many levels of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 435021
Bug#435021: libc6.1-dev: [alpha] unistd.h does not contain exit() prototype
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 06:21:19PM +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
Subject: libc6.1-dev: [alpha] unistd.h does not contain exit() prototype
Package: libc6.1-dev
Version: 2.6-4
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat exittest.c
#include unistd.h
I'm new in all these. I subscribed to the mailing list hopefully}
that I could be useful in something. Is there a way I can help with the
exit() function. I mean could you give me the appropriate file to add
the exit() function? I will try at least. Check from stdlib and I think i
may do
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:38:23 +0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing old glibc bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:38:23 +0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing old glibc bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
tags 310445 - experimental
Bug#310445: please document that static linking is unsupported
Tags were: moreinfo experimental
Tags removed: experimental
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
tags 215923 - sid
Bug#215923: libc6-dev: [sparc] fails to compile with bits/fenv.h and
-pedantic-errors
Tags were: sid
Tags removed: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Version: 2.6-4
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 07:18:08PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
Should this old glibc bug reassigned to gcc or closed?
Neither. It should be fixed.
I just re-ran the test case found in the bug logs. I wonder why you
didn't try it.
The test case still indicates that the bug
Should -Os be tested with gcc 4.2? Maybe it will work now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm quite sure that slowness is fixed and this bug can be closed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/26/07, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: glibc
Version: 2.6-4
Severity: serious
From:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=glibcver=2.6-4arch=hppastamp=1185478685file=log
[snip]
gcc-4.2 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -shared -o
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-07-28 22:01:58 + (Sat, 28 Jul 2007)
New Revision: 2471
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/local-linuxthreads-gscope.diff
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/hppa/local-linuxthreads-gscope.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:08:43 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#157086: status?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-07-29 00:38:28 + (Sun, 29 Jul 2007)
New Revision: 2472
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/cvs-printf_fp.c.diff
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series
Log:
* cvs-printf_fp.c.diff: new patch to
19 matches
Mail list logo
