Purpose

2009-07-28 Thread Patrick M. Rutkowski
I'm confused about the purpose of the libc6-dbg package if I every time I try to step into a libc function I get an error about missing source files. What is this package good for if not stepping into libc code? BEGIN PASTE rut...@titan:~/test$ cat main.c #include

Re: Purpose

2009-07-28 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Patrick M. Rutkowskirutsk...@gmail.com wrote: I'm confused about the purpose of the libc6-dbg package if I every time I try to step into a libc function I get an error about missing source files. What is this package good for if not stepping into libc code?

Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch

2009-07-28 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi all, I have recently uploaded to experimental eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch, from our multiarch branch. It doesn't use the multiarch paths yet, but it is a first step toward multiarch. The only difference with the unstable version is that libc-bin and libc-dev-bin are splitted out of libc6 and

Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch

2009-07-28 Thread Vincent Danjean
Hi, Aurelien Jarno wrote: The only difference with the unstable version is that libc-bin and libc-dev-bin are splitted out of libc6 and libc6-dev. This way it complies with the Debian Policy requirement that the libraries should not contain binaries, which is also a requirement for

Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch

2009-07-28 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:28:30AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: Hi, Aurelien Jarno wrote: The only difference with the unstable version is that libc-bin and libc-dev-bin are splitted out of libc6 and libc6-dev. This way it complies with the Debian Policy requirement that the libraries