Bug#575534: libc6: periodic timers hang fork()

2010-05-14 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, I’d like to follow up on this issue. According to the libc bug reporting guidelines, one should hear from the Debian maintainers whether the bug could possibly be Debian-specific before reporting them upstream. Can you comment on that? The bug might look like it is a weird corner case, but it

r4267 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches/kfreebsd

2010-05-14 Thread Petr Salinger
Author: ps-guest Date: 2010-05-14 11:47:01 + (Fri, 14 May 2010) New Revision: 4267 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff Log: * kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff: update to revision 3038 (from glibc-bsd). Closes: #58

Processed: tagging 581545

2010-05-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 581545 + pending Bug #581545 [libc0.1-dev] [kfreebsd] netinet/in.h origin issue Bug #581546 [libc0.1-dev] [kfreebsd] netinet/in.h origin issue Added tag(s) pending.

Bug#581545: [kfreebsd] netinet/in.h origin issue

2010-05-14 Thread Alexander GQ Gerasiov
Fri, 14 May 2010 13:08:18 +0200 (CEST) Petr Salinger wrote: > > There are defined some kernel-specific macroses, e.g. > > IPPROTO_DIVERT, and some FreeBSD software expect to find it there. > > > > But on Debian this header provided by libc, not > > kfreebsd-kernel-header. And this header could on

Bug#581545: [kfreebsd] netinet/in.h origin issue

2010-05-14 Thread Petr Salinger
There are defined some kernel-specific macroses, e.g. IPPROTO_DIVERT, and some FreeBSD software expect to find it there. But on Debian this header provided by libc, not kfreebsd-kernel-header. And this header could only been found in kfreebsd-headers-$(version) which makes difficult to build-depe