On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 04:15:54AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:06:33PM -0700, Herman Swartz wrote:
Hello,
I also have an application that uses get, set, swap user context functions.
What it boils down to is that someone needs to write this in ARM
assembly
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:38:45AM +0200, André Wöbbeking wrote:
I probably have the same problem: running Sid x86_64 I updated to eglibc
2.11.1-3 (from 2.10.2-9) and apps are crashing. E.g. I tried to build Qt
4.6.3
and qmake is crashing while configuring.
cat /proc/cpuinfo:
model
On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote:
I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected
x86_64 users running on Core i7.
I can only tell you that I also had tried 2.11.1-1 before and had the same
problem. And downgrading eglibc helped.
Does only Qt related applications
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:44:43AM +0200, André Wöbbeking wrote:
On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote:
I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected
x86_64 users running on Core i7.
I can only tell you that I also had tried 2.11.1-1 before and had the same
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:01:45PM +0200, André Wöbbeking wrote:
On Saturday 12 June 2010, André Wöbbeking wrote:
On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote:
I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected
x86_64 users running on Core i7.
I can only tell you that I also
On Saturday 12 June 2010, André Wöbbeking wrote:
On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote:
I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected
x86_64 users running on Core i7.
I can only tell you that I also had tried 2.11.1-1 before and had the same
problem. And downgrading
Then, since these functions were removed from Posix 2008, should the support of
these same functions be removed for all the other platforms?
Herman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
You mentionned rebuilding Qt 4. Does it happen with binaries you have
rebuilt yourself, or at least that link to libraries you have rebuilt
yourself?
Yes
If yes, make sure you don't have binutils-gold installed, as it is
currently broken with
On 12.06.2010 15:19, André Wöbbeking wrote:
I can confirm this also for C++ programs. It's an interaction of eglibc 2.11 and
gold. eglibc 2.10 and gold work together and eglibc 2.11 without gold also
works.
no, it's not 2.11, but 2.11 glibc built --with-multi-arch. Would the glibc
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 03:45:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 12.06.2010 15:19, André Wöbbeking wrote:
I can confirm this also for C++ programs. It's an interaction of eglibc 2.11
and
gold. eglibc 2.10 and gold work together and eglibc 2.11 without gold also
works.
no, it's not 2.11,
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 03:54:05AM -0700, Herman Swartz wrote:
Then, since these functions were removed from Posix 2008, should the support
of these same functions be removed for all the other platforms?
No, we can't break the ABI, so they will stay (almost) forever. But it
means that it
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Moreover we can also backport the optimized functions that have been
added in 2.12, but the current goal is to move 2.11 to squeeze, so it
will be for later.
All that said, I don't plan to disable --with-multi-arch.
Aurelien, you mentioned
On 12.06.2010 19:00, André Wöbbeking wrote:
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Moreover we can also backport the optimized functions that have been
added in 2.12, but the current goal is to move 2.11 to squeeze, so it
will be for later.
All that said, I don't plan to disable
13 matches
Mail list logo