Bug#369453: Status

2010-06-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 04:15:54AM +, Clint Adams wrote: On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:06:33PM -0700, Herman Swartz wrote: Hello, I also have an application that uses get, set, swap user context functions. What it boils down to is that someone needs to write this in ARM assembly

Bug#583858: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:38:45AM +0200, André Wöbbeking wrote: I probably have the same problem: running Sid x86_64 I updated to eglibc 2.11.1-3 (from 2.10.2-9) and apps are crashing. E.g. I tried to build Qt 4.6.3 and qmake is crashing while configuring. cat /proc/cpuinfo: model

Bug#583858: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread André Wöbbeking
On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote: I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected x86_64 users running on Core i7. I can only tell you that I also had tried 2.11.1-1 before and had the same problem. And downgrading eglibc helped. Does only Qt related applications

Bug#583858: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:44:43AM +0200, André Wöbbeking wrote: On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote: I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected x86_64 users running on Core i7. I can only tell you that I also had tried 2.11.1-1 before and had the same

Bug#583858: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:01:45PM +0200, André Wöbbeking wrote: On Saturday 12 June 2010, André Wöbbeking wrote: On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote: I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected x86_64 users running on Core i7. I can only tell you that I also

Bug#583858: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread André Wöbbeking
On Saturday 12 June 2010, André Wöbbeking wrote: On Saturday 12 June 2010, you wrote: I really doubt it's the same problem. The reported bug only affected x86_64 users running on Core i7. I can only tell you that I also had tried 2.11.1-1 before and had the same problem. And downgrading

Bug#369453: Bug 369453 User Context Switching

2010-06-12 Thread Herman Swartz
Then, since these functions were removed from Posix 2008, should the support of these same functions be removed for all the other platforms? Herman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#583858: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread André Wöbbeking
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: You mentionned rebuilding Qt 4. Does it happen with binaries you have rebuilt yourself, or at least that link to libraries you have rebuilt yourself? Yes If yes, make sure you don't have binutils-gold installed, as it is currently broken with

Re: Bug#585051: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread Matthias Klose
On 12.06.2010 15:19, André Wöbbeking wrote: I can confirm this also for C++ programs. It's an interaction of eglibc 2.11 and gold. eglibc 2.10 and gold work together and eglibc 2.11 without gold also works. no, it's not 2.11, but 2.11 glibc built --with-multi-arch. Would the glibc

Re: Bug#585051: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 03:45:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 12.06.2010 15:19, André Wöbbeking wrote: I can confirm this also for C++ programs. It's an interaction of eglibc 2.11 and gold. eglibc 2.10 and gold work together and eglibc 2.11 without gold also works. no, it's not 2.11,

Bug#369453: Bug 369453 User Context Switching

2010-06-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 03:54:05AM -0700, Herman Swartz wrote: Then, since these functions were removed from Posix 2008, should the support of these same functions be removed for all the other platforms? No, we can't break the ABI, so they will stay (almost) forever. But it means that it

Re: Bug#585051: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread André Wöbbeking
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Moreover we can also backport the optimized functions that have been added in 2.12, but the current goal is to move 2.11 to squeeze, so it will be for later. All that said, I don't plan to disable --with-multi-arch. Aurelien, you mentioned

Re: Bug#585051: (no subject)

2010-06-12 Thread Matthias Klose
On 12.06.2010 19:00, André Wöbbeking wrote: On Saturday 12 June 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Moreover we can also backport the optimized functions that have been added in 2.12, but the current goal is to move 2.11 to squeeze, so it will be for later. All that said, I don't plan to disable