Re: C.UTF-8 in squeeze

2011-01-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
tag Roger Leigh a écrit : > clone 522776 -1 > reassign -1 eglibc > retitle -1 eglibc: Please provide a C.UTF-8 locale by default > severity -1 important > thanks > > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 09:14:47PM -0500, David Holland wrote: >> Can this please get done (adding a C.UTF-8 locale)? It is absolu

Bug#603914: Please drop non-UTF8 locales

2011-01-09 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Roger Leigh dixit: >I think the "all byte sequences valid" applies mainly to narrow >character I/O. i.e. printf/puts etc. won't alter, drop or otherwise >mangle any non 7-bit-ASCII codes. i.e. I think the intent was to >ensure 8-bit cleanliness in a 7-bit locale. This naturally extends >to UTF-

Bug#603914: Please drop non-UTF8 locales

2011-01-09 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 10:21:50PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Roger Leigh dixit: > > >From my reading of the standards a UTF-8 C locale would be required > >to behave identically to the existing ASCII C locale: > > > >• will consider all byte sequences valid > > I think it wouldn’t (since UT

Bug#603914: Please drop non-UTF8 locales

2011-01-09 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Roger Leigh dixit: >From my reading of the standards a UTF-8 C locale would be required >to behave identically to the existing ASCII C locale: > >• will consider all byte sequences valid I think it wouldn’t (since UTF-8 mbrtowc/wcrtomb don’t work this way, and it can’t be done with “just” the POS

Processed: tagging 585737

2011-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 585737 + patch Bug #585737 [locales] locales: upgrade not atomic Bug #586489 [locales] locales needs higher dpkg priority Bug #588180 [locales] dist-upgrade from lenny to squeeze with tons of warning messages Added tag(s) patch. Added tag(s)