Bug#618562: syscall in libc6 is broken for __NR_fanotify_mark

2011-03-27 Thread Chen Jie
Hi Aurelien, Got it, thanks for the explanation. Just curious, does the same problem exist on X86-64(64bit kernel + 32 bit userland)? If yes, should the caller of syscall() need to split each 64bit argument into two 32bit arguments? 2011/3/26 Aurelien Jarno > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:36:30PM

Bug#618562: syscall in libc6 is broken for __NR_fanotify_mark

2011-03-27 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:13:31AM +, Chen Jie wrote: > Hi Aurelien, > > Got it, thanks for the explanation. > > Just curious, does the same problem exist on X86-64(64bit kernel + 32 bit > userland)? If yes, should the caller of syscall() need to split each 64bit > argument into two 32bit arg

Re: Help needed with eglibc 2.13

2011-03-27 Thread dann frazier
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:48:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:03:00PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > Hi alpha porters, > > > > > > I am trying to get eglibc 2.13 ready to get uploaded into unstable

r4597 - glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.13/debian/testsuite-checking

2011-03-27 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2011-03-27 17:09:32 + (Sun, 27 Mar 2011) New Revision: 4597 Modified: glibc-package/branches/eglibc-2.13/debian/testsuite-checking/expected-results-alphaev67-linux-gnu-alphaev67 Log: Update alphaev67 test results, ignoring failure due to binutils Modified: glibc-pa

Re: Help needed with eglibc 2.13

2011-03-27 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:44:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi alpha porters, > > I am trying to get eglibc 2.13 ready to get uploaded into unstable. I > have done the missing porting work on alpha, but I am now stuck with > testsuite regressions, and I would need help to fix them. Here are