[bts-link] source package src:glibc

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:glibc # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ # user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org # remote status report for #856503

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:glibc

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:glibc > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

On 7/8/20 9:21 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > [Note, this e-mail may look familiar as it is mostly copied over from > the buster call, not much has changed, AFAICT]. > > As part of the interim architecture qualification for bullseye, we > request that DSA, the security team, Wanna build, and

Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

* Paul Gevers: > * Concern for armel and armhf: only secondary upstream support in GCC >(Raised by the GCC maintainer; carried over from stretch and buster) glibc upstream lately has trouble finding qualified persons to implement security fixes for the 32-bit Arm architecture. > * Concern