Your message dated Tue, 9 Jan 2024 07:17:39 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1060233: libc6: Missing libdl.so
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060233,
regarding libc6: Missing libdl.so
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Hi,
On 2024-01-08 22:06, Axel Scheepers wrote:
> Package: locales
> Version: 2.36-9+deb12u3
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: d-i l10n
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> It would be nice to have C.UTF-8 in the list which dpkg-reconfigure locales
> shows; When installing a desktop I usually select the C locale
Dear Aurelien,
Thanks for the help. Please close this bug report.
Thanks, Paul
--
Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.au www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of SydneyAustralia
Join the Union and fight for a better University:
Package: locales
Version: 2.36-9+deb12u3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i l10n
Dear Maintainer,
It would be nice to have C.UTF-8 in the list which dpkg-reconfigure locales
shows; When installing a desktop I usually select the C locale since the
others don't really apply and I'm unable to use a
Hi,
On 08-01-2024 01:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I am still not sure why it got killed on arm64 and not on other debci
workers, there as still swap available. Actually looking at the munin
plot, it seems that the arm64 debci workers stopped using swap around
September 2023 contrary to the other
On 2024-01-08 12:24, Paul Szabo wrote:
> Dear Aurelien,
>
> > Starting with glibc 2.34, libdl is an empty library. Therefore only a
> > libdl.a is provided to support linking with -ldl.
>
> At bullseye, I explicitly needed to use libdl e.g. with constructs like
>
> export
On 2024-01-08 19:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08-01-2024 01:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I am still not sure why it got killed on arm64 and not on other debci
> > workers, there as still swap available. Actually looking at the munin
> > plot, it seems that the arm64 debci workers stopped
Hi all,
On 08-01-2024 19:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
Can you tell me how you saw that? I neither spotted that, nor is not
having swap a conscious act, so rather a mistake.
I just checked and it seems that on ci-worker-arm64-08 was not having
swap. We did have /swap created as our other workers,
Hi,
On 08-01-2024 01:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I am still not sure why it got killed on arm64 and not on other debci
workers, there as still swap available. Actually looking at the munin
plot, it seems that the arm64 debci workers stopped using swap around
September 2023 contrary to the other
9 matches
Mail list logo
