Re: [musl] Re: Bug#1068350: musl: miscompiles (runtime problems) on riscv64 and s390x with static-pie → seems to be a toolchain bug after all, it does too hit glibc

2024-04-05 Thread Rich Felker
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 05:04:37AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Markus Wichmann dixit: > > >can check with readelf -r what the relocation types are. If they are not > >relative, they will not be processed. > > Gotcha! They are all R_390_RELATIVE except for: > > 00045ff0 00110016

Bug#1063490: marked as done (tzdata: [INTL:it] Italian po-debconf translation update)

2024-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 05 Apr 2024 20:52:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1063490: fixed in tzdata 2024a-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1063490, regarding tzdata: [INTL:it] Italian po-debconf translation update to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processing of tzdata_2024a-2_source.changes

2024-04-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
tzdata_2024a-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tzdata_2024a-2.dsc tzdata_2024a-2.debian.tar.xz tzdata_2024a-2_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

tzdata_2024a-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2024-04-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 22:24:29 +0200 Source: tzdata Built-For-Profiles: noudeb Architecture: source Version: 2024a-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: GNU Libc

[Git][glibc-team/tzdata][sid] 5 commits: Combine upstream make calls

2024-04-05 Thread Benjamin Drung (@bdrung)
Benjamin Drung pushed to branch sid at GNU Libc Maintainers / tzdata Commits: e1ec3286 by Benjamin Drung at 2024-04-05T13:35:08+02:00 Combine upstream make calls Avoid code duplication by calling the upstream make only once. - - - - - c08c8c44 by Benjamin Drung at 2024-04-05T13:36:14+02:00

[Git][glibc-team/tzdata] Pushed new tag debian/2024a-2

2024-04-05 Thread Benjamin Drung (@bdrung)
Benjamin Drung pushed new tag debian/2024a-2 at GNU Libc Maintainers / tzdata -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/tzdata/-/tree/debian/2024a-2 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

Bug#411059: sash: bad practice of multiple accounts with uid==0 lead to broken system

2024-04-05 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2024-04-05 21:59, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Control: title -1 nscd caches "wrong" name for accounts with the same uid > Control: found -1 2.37-15 > > Rehashing this 17-years old bug which biten me today quite hard. > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:55:28 -0500 Yaroslav Halchenko > wrote: > > > >

Processed: retitle 411059 to nscd caches "wrong" name for accounts with the same uid

2024-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 411059 nscd caches "wrong" name for accounts with the same uid Bug #411059 [nscd] nscd: getpwuid() behavior differs from default (de-facto standard) Changed Bug title to 'nscd caches "wrong" name for accounts with the same uid' from

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#411059: sash: bad practice of multiple accounts with uid==0 lead to broken system

2024-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > title -1 nscd caches "wrong" name for accounts with the same uid Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > found -1 2.37-15 Bug #411059 [nscd] nscd: getpwuid() behavior differs from default (de-facto standard) Marked as found in versions glibc/2.37-15.

Bug#411059: sash: bad practice of multiple accounts with uid==0 lead to broken system

2024-04-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: title -1 nscd caches "wrong" name for accounts with the same uid Control: found -1 2.37-15 Rehashing this 17-years old bug which biten me today quite hard. On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:55:28 -0500 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Today, after unsucsessful attempt to login as sashroot, I've got

Re: [musl] Re: Bug#1068350: musl: miscompiles (runtime problems) on riscv64 and s390x with static-pie → seems to be a toolchain bug after all, it does too hit glibc

2024-04-05 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
* Thorsten Glaser [2024-04-05 05:04:37 +]: > Markus Wichmann dixit: > > >can check with readelf -r what the relocation types are. If they are not > >relative, they will not be processed. > > Gotcha! They are all R_390_RELATIVE except for: > > 00045ff0 00110016 R_390_64

Re: [musl] Re: Bug#1068350: musl: miscompiles (runtime problems) on riscv64 and s390x with static-pie → seems to be a toolchain bug after all, it does too hit glibc

2024-04-05 Thread Markus Wichmann
Am Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 05:58:15AM + schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > Markus Wichmann dixit: > >In any case, the emission of non-relative relocations is the issue here, > >and it is coming from the linker. > > They are present in the glibc static-pie binary as well, though. > And tbh they look to me

Re: [musl] Re: Bug#1068350: musl: miscompiles (runtime problems) on riscv64 and s390x with static-pie → seems to be a toolchain bug after all, it does too hit glibc

2024-04-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Markus Wichmann dixit: >I may not really know what I am talking about, so take this with a grain >of salt, but isn't this missing a -Bsymbolic somewhere? Ironically, that >switch causes ld to not emit symbolic relocations. I seem to remember >reading long ago in Rich's initial -static-pie