> On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:38:05 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
GOTO> OK, I pulled the Jakub's patch and built it. I put it at:
GOTO>
GOTO> http://www.gotom.jp/~gotom/debian/glibc/2.3.2.ds1-21_ia64.linuxthreads
GOTO> David, could you test this glibc on your ia64
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:32:29 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
GOTO> I fear to change this interface until sarge release because there
GOTO> might be another packages that uses sched_setaffinity.
Well, yes, schedutils probably would need updating. I don't know of
an
Package: glibc
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The current Sarge glibc still provides the obsolete 2-argument
interface for sched_setaffinity(). As more software is starting to
use this system call, this is becoming a real issue because developers
will have to create a sp
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:32:20 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
GOTO> David, does this problem only occurs on ia64? Or i686? To be honest,
GOTO> I have concerned this kind of problem - the incompatibility between
GOTO> nptl and linuxthreads.
As indicated in my bug
While there hasn't been any discussion for glibc bugzilla report #685
[1], private communication with one of the glibc maintainers indicates
that this issue is not considered to be a glibc bug because,
officially, glibc supports only one thread library at a time:
LinuxThreads _or_ NPTL, but not bot
>>>>> On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:55:45 -0800, David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> said:
David> I just checked and with the current packaging, I'm still
David> getting failures during the libunwind build.
After fixing these problems in li
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:58:07 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> said:
Matthias> David Mosberger writes:
>> >>>>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:47:41 +0100, Matthias Klose
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sa
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:47:41 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> please get the libgcc1 package from the unstable
Matthias> distribution.
I think I've got that one already (libgcc1 v3.4.3-2).
Matthias> It's currently built by the gcc-3.4 sources and inclu
Hi Matthias,
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:55:57 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> with the patch attached and an updated gcc-3.3 package,
Matthias> libunwind support for ia64 seems to work for me. I
Matthias> couldn't install any of the built packages. I'd lik
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 13:35:07 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> works ok until building glibc with the just built
Matthias> compiler. _Unwind_Resume, _Unwind_GetRegionStart are
Matthias> referenced by glibc objects, _Unwind_GetIP, _Unwind_SetGR,
Matthias>
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 12:49:38 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> ok, I'm currently bootstrapping gcc-3.3 with the patch
Matthias> attached, a glibc bootstrap using this compiler did
Matthias> succeed. I'll upload the fixed gcc-3.3, when bootstrap and
Matth
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:10:13 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> I assume the link line should read
Matthias> -lunwind -lgcc -lgcc_eh
Matthias> instead of
Matthias> -lgcc -lgcc_eh
I already submitted a patch for this (based on a patch by HJ Lu)
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:26:01 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> From my point of view we can get around with it by
Matthias> including the libunwind shared library in libgcc1 for the
Matthias> sarge release. I'm worried about the version skew of the
Matt
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:27:52 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> Is the patch in #278836 a prerequisite for the above
Matthias> changes, or can it be done without it?
If the gas-patch isn't applied, you run the risk of getting wrong
unwind-info into object-f
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:14:48 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
GOTO> We got security bug report; it may be chance to switch -19.
Cool. I suddenly like security bugs... ;-)
GOTO> I put no -fomit-frame-pointer .deb based on -18 at:
GOTO> http://www.gotom.jp/~got
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:02:22 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Goto> But I try to build with -fomit-frame-pointer.
You mean _without_ -fomit-frame-pointer, right?
Goto> If it's serious for some usages, please let me know.
It's definitely serious. Any application that tri
work.
Is it possible to fix this before Debian 3.1 is released? It would be
very nice, since otherwise, backtraces are hopelessly broken.
Thanks,
--david
>>>>> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:21:04 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Goto> At Fri, 20 Aug 20
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:21:04 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
GOTO> I think it's good idea to drop -fomit-frame-pointer from
GOTO> linux.mk for building libc with NPTL. If such optimization
GOTO> option is fine for specific architecture, it should be defined
GOTO> -fom
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:51:03 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
GOTO> Hi David, At Thu, 19 Aug 2004 04:36:59 -0700, David Mosberger
GOTO> wrote:
>> I recently noticed that with Debian/testing or Debian/unstable,
>> many libunwind
Hi,
I recently noticed that with Debian/testing or Debian/unstable, many
libunwind [1] checks are failing with a SEGFAULT. The root-cause of
these crashes appears to be that the TLS-version of libc-2.3.2 is
built with -fomit-frame-pointer on i386 (see nptl_extra_cflags in
debian/sysdeps/i386.mk o
Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10.0.1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid patch
I noticed that I can no longer load a directory via dired. The
root-cause of the problem appears to be that Emacs uses setrlimit() to
set RLIMIT_STACK. This limit won't be page-size-aligned in general.
As a result, whene
Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10.0.1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid patch
I noticed that I can no longer load a directory via dired. The
root-cause of the problem appears to be that Emacs uses setrlimit() to
set RLIMIT_STACK. This limit won't be page-size-aligned in general.
As a result, whene
>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:23:48 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Goto> At Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:37:02 -0700,
Goto> David Mosberger wrote:
>> >>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:33:47 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:33:47 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Goto> Adding HZ=1024 for userland seems ok for me even if CONFIG_IA64_HP_SIM
Goto> is defined, but any problems?
Yeah, but it just looks so warty...
Are there any Debian packages that break if HZ is not defined
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:09:33 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Goto> Yes, it's not libc6 own problem, but kernel source problem.
Goto> In some kernels, this problem should also be occured on alpha.
Goto> One way to fix is to enclose #ifdef __KERNEL__.
Goto> David, could
> On 05 Sep 2003 18:38:45 -0400, Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Camm> Greetings, and thankyou for this suggestion. It does seem like a bit
Camm> of a hack though, no?
It's a hack until it's used > 3 times, then it becomes a
technique... ;-)
Camm> Do you feel this would be more
> On 29 Aug 2003 17:38:31 -0400, Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Camm> Greetings, and thanks again! So how do I find the right area
Camm> before dumping?
Perhaps it would work to scan /proc/self/maps for the mapping that
covers the address of (any) function descriptor in the main
> On 28 Aug 2003 21:00:54 -0400, Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Camm> Greetings! This sounds like the sort of sidestepping of the
Camm> function descriptors that I was seeking initally. Can you
Camm> elaborate? I can dump the actual address, but don't I need to
Camm> find wh
Camm,
> On 21 Aug 2003 00:52:14 -0400, Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Camm> --enable-static configuration option -- default on ia64, as a
Camm> workaround for current algorithm of runtime realized function
Camm> descriptors.
It appears that you'd see the same/similar problem on
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 00:14:00 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> Thanks. I've just updated cvs.dpatch to the latest. glibc
>> 2.3.2-1 should fix this problem.
Excellent. Debian beating everybody else to the punch, once again! ;-)
--david
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 00:14:00 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Thanks. I've just updated cvs.dpatch to the latest. glibc
>> 2.3.2-1 should fix this problem.
Excellent. Debian beating everybody else to the punch, once again! ;-)
--david
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 18:22:38 +0900, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
GOTO> Ah, I see. But... is it critical thing to replace "stable" package?
GOTO> Changing Debian "stable" release is something high barrier...
GOTO> I don't know current IA-64 really needs such change or not, s
>> investigate and give us an answer, please?
>>
>> Bdale, at Linux Conf Australia this week
>>
>>
>> From: David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: [ia64 R&D] bad {MIN}SIGSTKSZ on debian glibc-2.2.5-14.3
>>
>&g
33 matches
Mail list logo
