Package: libc6-i686
Version: 2.22-7
Severity: minor
Hey guys,
I hope you're well.
* What led up to the situation?
While installing security patches, aptitude
asked if it would be OK to remove libc6-i686,
and neither
$ apt-cache show libc6-i686
or
$ aptitude
If you see
A non-dpkg owned copy of the C library was found in /lib.
and if I understand this bug correctly, you might
want to check if the following files are on your
computer
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 182008-07-10 11:41 /lib/ld-linux.so.1 -
ld-linux.so.1.9.11
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root
On Sun:11:56, GOTO Masanori wrote:
all programs check ENOSPC, not ENOINO. This means that
you have to change all programs which uses ENOSPC
Compatibility is a good point.
Thanks.
[...]
So please consider ENOSPC is something has no more space.
I'm OK with that.
Here's the big but.
BUT,
,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Mon, 14 Apr 2003 21:33:05 -0700,
Kingsley G. Morse Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon:16:09, Ben Collins wrote:
Kingsley wrote:
glibc currently returns errno 28, which is
defined as
No space left on device
On Mon:16:09, Ben Collins wrote:
Kingsley wrote:
glibc currently returns errno 28, which is
defined as
No space left on device
and is misleading. It should mention inodes.
Inodes are a specific term that does not apply
to all cases where ENOSPC is used. What happens
if
I fixed a similar bug after upgrading to 2.2.12. Like you, I was using a
bogus IP address internally and a real IP address for the rest of the web.
In my case, the breakthrough was using tcpdump to diagnose the problem. I
think tcpdump may well help you too. For example, you could first run
6 matches
Mail list logo
