On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:40:45PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:48:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:03:00PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> &
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:48:30PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:03:00PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Hi alpha porters,
> > >
> > > I am trying to get eg
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:03:00PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi alpha porters,
>
> I am trying to get eglibc 2.13 ready to get uploaded into unstable. I
> have done the missing porting work on alpha, but I am now stuck with
> testsuite regressions, and I would need help to fix them.
>
> Firs
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.10.2-6
Severity: important
On some archs (hppa and sparc at least), there is no O_FSYNC define in
bits/fcntl.h. However, even on these archs, we have this block of defines:
#ifdef __USE_BSD
# define FAPPENDO_APPEND
# define FFSYNC O_FSYNC
# define FAS
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:47:54PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> On pirmadienis 04 Sausis 2010 17:18:40 Helge Deller wrote:
> > libc6-2.10.2-3 made it much, *much* better (I'm not sure yet why!!).
> > But I can still reproduce the bug on my system with your testcases. It's
> > just much harder
-2.6/build-tree/glibc-2.6'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glibc-2.6/build-tree/hppa-libc'
make: *** [/build/buildd/glibc-2.6/stamp-dir/build_libc] Error 2
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n our current gregorian calendar, so those date are
> displayed as "NULL".
makes sense.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
9223372036854775807 = NULL
--
dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Organization
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
elated to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108631, but I do
not think that's the case - in fact, sarge already has the code that
RedHat used to fix that bug (afaict).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:29:49PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060526 15:14]:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:20:38PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > >
severity 320240 grave
thanks
Raising the severity because this is generating a ton of FTBFS issues -
pretty much anything w/ C++. I'm told this is fixed in experimental; if
someone can confirm, please tag as such.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
GOTO,
Your debs worked for me - evolution now starts w/o
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.18. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 10:56 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:53:43PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > Why was the sarge tag removed? Did I misuse it?
>
> Probably. The sarge tag is for bugs that only appear in testing but not
> in unstable. Since I cou
Why was the sarge tag removed? Did I misuse it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: glibc
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 09:48 -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> Hi Dann,
>
> I don't seem to be getting much traction in getting the NPTL ld.so bug
> resolved. I posted a glibc bug-report:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=685
Seve
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
oops - tried to reopen an archived bug.
opening a new one instead. see #218645 for the original report.
- Forwarded message from dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTE
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
oops - tried to reopen an archived bug.
opening a new one instead. see #218645 for the original report.
- Forwarded message from dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTE
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
snippet from my log - you can reproduce by trying to build dosfstools
on ia64. I tested this specifically to look for regressions, because
I recall this being broken & fixed at one point (can't find the bug report
at th
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
snippet from my log - you can reproduce by trying to build dosfstools
on ia64. I tested this specifically to look for regressions, because
I recall this being broken & fixed at one point (can't find the bug report
at th
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
I tried to build discover today & noticed the pal.h bug is back again.
This used to be worked around in the kernel-headers package with this patch:
--- linux/include/asm-ia64/pal.h2002-07-11 12:06:59.0 -
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-9
Severity: important
I tried to build discover today & noticed the pal.h bug is back again.
This used to be worked around in the kernel-headers package with this patch:
--- linux/include/asm-ia64/pal.h2002-07-11 12:06:59.0 -
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 10:44:23AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> The adjtimex bug has been assigned to libc6 already, with a note that
> its now severity serious as it breaks d-i. I'm proposing to do binary
> NMUs for alpha, ia64 busybox-cvs : hence I'm CC'ing all the uploaders
> for busybox
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 10:44:23AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> The adjtimex bug has been assigned to libc6 already, with a note that
> its now severity serious as it breaks d-i. I'm proposing to do binary
> NMUs for alpha, ia64 busybox-cvs : hence I'm CC'ing all the uploaders
> for busybox
add r2 = SC_NAT, r32
- nop 0
add r3 = SC_BSP, r32
;;
st8 [r2] = rNAT, (SC_RNAT-SC_NAT)
- End forwarded message -
--
---
dann frazier
Hewlett-Packard
Linux Systems Division
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(970) 898-0800
add r2 = SC_NAT, r32
- nop 0
add r3 = SC_BSP, r32
;;
st8 [r2] = rNAT, (SC_RNAT-SC_NAT)
- End forwarded message -
--
---
dann frazier
Hewlett-Packard
Linux Systems Division
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(970) 898-0800
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-9
Severity: normal
## ssh via socks is unable to resolve my hostname
dannf@hazel:~$ socksify ssh home.dannf.org
ssh: home.dannf.org: Name or service not known
## but the system can
dannf@hazel:~$ host home.dannf.org
home.dannf.org A 12.252.80.98
## and
26 matches
Mail list logo
