On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:17:23PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Fri, 07 Feb 2003 12:18:24 +,
Steve Haslam wrote:
With libc6 2.3.1-10, ld.so would try to link in the i686/cmov version of
libssl on a K6-III (i586) machine-- I had to divert the libs away, and it
then loaded the i586
At Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:03:09 +,
Steve Haslam wrote:
[1 text/plain; iso-8859-1 (quoted-printable)]
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:17:23PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Fri, 07 Feb 2003 12:18:24 +,
Steve Haslam wrote:
With libc6 2.3.1-10, ld.so would try to link in the i686/cmov
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:17:23PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Fri, 07 Feb 2003 12:18:24 +,
Steve Haslam wrote:
With libc6 2.3.1-10, ld.so would try to link in the i686/cmov version of
libssl on a K6-III (i586) machine-- I had to divert the libs away, and it
then loaded the i586
At Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:03:09 +,
Steve Haslam wrote:
[1 text/plain; iso-8859-1 (quoted-printable)]
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:17:23PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Fri, 07 Feb 2003 12:18:24 +,
Steve Haslam wrote:
With libc6 2.3.1-10, ld.so would try to link in the i686/cmov
At Fri, 07 Feb 2003 12:18:24 +,
Steve Haslam wrote:
With libc6 2.3.1-10, ld.so would try to link in the i686/cmov version of
libssl on a K6-III (i586) machine-- I had to divert the libs away, and it
then loaded the i586 versions.
Now with 2.3.1-11, ld.so is not loading *any*
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-11
Severity: normal
With libc6 2.3.1-10, ld.so would try to link in the i686/cmov version of
libssl on a K6-III (i586) machine-- I had to divert the libs away, and it
then loaded the i586 versions.
Now with 2.3.1-11, ld.so is not loading *any* arch-specific library,
6 matches
Mail list logo
