On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:26:10PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:01:36 +0100,
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Kernel headers? /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h is nothing supplied by the
> > kernel.
> Ah, I misunderstood, you're right.
I first thought it can by fixed in asm/fcntl.h, but I
At Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:01:36 +0100,
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:43:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also
> > be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the
> > actual critical bug, and i
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100,
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or
>> > linux-kernel-headers package?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > -- gotom
>>
>> I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:43:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also
> be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the
> actual critical bug, and if lvm needs to use kernel headers, lvm
> should have such header
At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or
> > linux-kernel-headers package?
> >
> > Regards,
> > -- gotom
>
> I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and
> lvm because it can work around
5 matches
Mail list logo
