Processed: Re: Bug#372544: fixed in eglibc 2.13-1

2011-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 372544 - moreinfo - unreproducible Bug #372544 {Done: Vincent Lefevre } [libc6] libc6-dev: fma() is incorrect (inaccurate), not conform to C99 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. Bug #372544 {Done: Vincent Lefevre } [libc6] libc6-dev: fma() is incorre

Bug#372544: fixed in eglibc 2.13-1

2011-12-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2011-12-09 22:34:30 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > I'll try to write my own test suite (based on difficult cases and > > with the 4 rounding modes). > > Please open a new bug when it's done and if you find some more bugs. In > the meanwhile, I guess it's better to trust upstream and consider

Processed: Re: Bug#372544: fixed in eglibc 2.13-1

2011-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 372544 2.13-1 Bug #372544 [libc6] libc6-dev: fma() is incorrect (inaccurate), not conform to C99 Bug No longer marked as found in versions eglibc/2.13-1. > fixed 372544 2.13-1 Bug #372544 [libc6] libc6-dev: fma() is incorrect (inaccurate

Bug#372544: fixed in eglibc 2.13-1

2011-12-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
notfound 372544 2.13-1 fixed 372544 2.13-1 thanks On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:52:26PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2011-10-18 07:15:31 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > I have reopened the bug, but tagged it moreinfo + unreproducible given > > fma() has been implemented in eglibc 2.13, and tha

Bug#372544: fixed in eglibc 2.13-1

2011-10-19 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:52:26PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2011-10-18 07:15:31 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > I have reopened the bug, but tagged it moreinfo + unreproducible given > > fma() has been implemented in eglibc 2.13, and that the testcases you > > provided now pass correctly

Bug#372544: fixed in eglibc 2.13-1

2011-10-18 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2011-10-18 07:15:31 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I have reopened the bug, but tagged it moreinfo + unreproducible given > fma() has been implemented in eglibc 2.13, and that the testcases you > provided now pass correctly on at least i386 and amd64. > > Please provide some more details or tes

Bug#372544: fixed in eglibc 2.13-1

2011-10-17 Thread Aurelien Jarno
unarchive 372544 reopen 372544 found 372544 2.13-1 tags 372544 + moreinfo tags 372544 + unreproducible thanks On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:53:49AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2011-05-01 19:48:41 +, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Source: eglibc > > Source-Version: 2.13-1 > > > > We believe tha

Processed: Re: Bug#372544: fixed in eglibc 2.13-1

2011-10-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 372544 Bug #372544 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [libc6] libc6-dev: fma() is incorrect (inaccurate), not conform to C99 Unarchived Bug 372544 > reopen 372544 Bug #372544 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [libc6] libc6-dev: fma() is incorrect (inaccura