Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 372544 - moreinfo - unreproducible
Bug #372544 {Done: Vincent Lefevre } [libc6] libc6-dev:
fma() is incorrect (inaccurate), not conform to C99
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #372544 {Done: Vincent Lefevre } [libc6] libc6-dev:
fma() is incorre
On 2011-12-09 22:34:30 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I'll try to write my own test suite (based on difficult cases and
> > with the 4 rounding modes).
>
> Please open a new bug when it's done and if you find some more bugs. In
> the meanwhile, I guess it's better to trust upstream and consider
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 372544 2.13-1
Bug #372544 [libc6] libc6-dev: fma() is incorrect (inaccurate), not conform to
C99
Bug No longer marked as found in versions eglibc/2.13-1.
> fixed 372544 2.13-1
Bug #372544 [libc6] libc6-dev: fma() is incorrect (inaccurate
notfound 372544 2.13-1
fixed 372544 2.13-1
thanks
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:52:26PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2011-10-18 07:15:31 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I have reopened the bug, but tagged it moreinfo + unreproducible given
> > fma() has been implemented in eglibc 2.13, and tha
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:52:26PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2011-10-18 07:15:31 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I have reopened the bug, but tagged it moreinfo + unreproducible given
> > fma() has been implemented in eglibc 2.13, and that the testcases you
> > provided now pass correctly
On 2011-10-18 07:15:31 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I have reopened the bug, but tagged it moreinfo + unreproducible given
> fma() has been implemented in eglibc 2.13, and that the testcases you
> provided now pass correctly on at least i386 and amd64.
>
> Please provide some more details or tes
unarchive 372544
reopen 372544
found 372544 2.13-1
tags 372544 + moreinfo
tags 372544 + unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:53:49AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2011-05-01 19:48:41 +, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Source: eglibc
> > Source-Version: 2.13-1
> >
> > We believe tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 372544
Bug #372544 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [libc6] libc6-dev:
fma() is incorrect (inaccurate), not conform to C99
Unarchived Bug 372544
> reopen 372544
Bug #372544 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [libc6] libc6-dev:
fma() is incorrect (inaccura
8 matches
Mail list logo