Bug#522774: Bug#522773: possible solutions for __unused problem

2011-07-29 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 07:09:37PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Ben Hutchings dixit: The use of __undefined in the BSDs predates use of it by both Linux and GNU. (But when using this argumentation style, we’d probably better take this upstream… except that upstream may not be helping…) We

Bug#522774: Bug#522773: possible solutions for __unused problem

2011-07-29 Thread Robert Millan
2011/7/29 Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org: We already asked you back in September 2009 to report this upstream. He did, precisely in September 2009: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14186 He still got no response though. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#522774: Bug#522773: possible solutions for __unused problem

2011-06-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 18:24 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Robert Millan dixit: I can see they wouldn't be excited about it, but they might also accept You know that there are more than one BSD, but only one glibc, IIRC Drepper isn’t even its maintainer any more. According to

Bug#522774: Bug#522773: possible solutions for __unused problem

2011-06-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Ben Hutchings dixit: Honestly, when resolving this I’d go for “who has the older rights”. Maybe look at how CSUR resolves different claims to the same part of the Unicode PUA, or something like that. Nevertheless, thanks on picking this up. Debian GNU/Linux is the older system; the Debian