Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2

2009-08-05 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes: What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then? At present, I would expect that to run into file conflicts with libc6. In the future, yes, that could be a problem without appropriate Breaks: or Conflicts: declarations. :-/ One possible

Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)

2009-08-03 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:02:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't hesitate to test it on your machine. What happens if someone install libc-bin without a

Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)

2009-08-03 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:38:32AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Bastian Blank a écrit : What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then? Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now. If it is not the same major version, it will probably break, I'll

Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2

2009-08-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes: On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:38:32AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Bastian Blank a écrit : What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then? Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now. If it is not the same

Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2

2009-08-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de (03/08/2009): Does it break aptitude too? I think that people involved in serious things like multiarch and glibc might appreciate your staying quiet at some point given the quite huge mess you initially created. But maybe that's just me. Mraw, KiBi.

Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2

2009-08-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes: Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de (03/08/2009): Does it break aptitude too? I think that people involved in serious things like multiarch and glibc might appreciate your staying quiet at some point given the quite huge mess you initially created.

Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2

2009-08-03 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:21:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes: On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:38:32AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Bastian Blank a écrit : What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then? Forgot about that

Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2

2009-08-03 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:05:22AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes: Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de (03/08/2009): Does it break aptitude too? I think that people involved in serious things like multiarch and glibc might appreciate your

Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)

2009-08-02 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2009-07-29 22:12 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: In short it looks like a Pre-Depends is overkill, and that a Depends is enough. I'll upload a new version soon to